SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)

of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

 

Filed by the Registrant                              ��Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  

Check the appropriate box:

 

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

 

Definitive Additional Materials

 

Soliciting Material Pursuant to§240.14a-12

 §240.14a-12

ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (check the appropriate box):

 

No fee required.

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(1) and0-11.

 (1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

 (2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

 (3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

     

 (4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

     

 (5)

Total fee paid:

 

     

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 (1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:

 

 

 

(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)Filing Party:

(4)Date Filed:


LOGO

 

ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.

2500 COLUMBIA AVE., LANCASTER, PA 17603

P.O. BOX 3001, LANCASTER, PA 17604

 

www.armstrongceilings.com

 

April 30, 201827, 2021

 

LOGO   

Thomas M. Armstrong    

Founder    1860    

LOGO

20182021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.

Dear Fellow Shareholders:

We look forward to your attendance virtually via the Internet in person, or by proxy at the 20182021 Armstrong World Industries, Inc. Annual Shareholders’ Meeting. We will hold the meeting at 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, July 12, 2018.June 24, 2021. To provide a consistent and convenient experience for all shareholders regardless of location, we are holding this Annual Shareholders’ Meeting in an entirely virtual format.

In fiscal 2017, we continued to execute on our strategy, driving significant consolidated2020, despite a challenging operating environment resulting from the COVID-19 global pandemic:

Our business produced net sales, growthAdjusted EBITDA and delivering strong adjusted EBITDA performance,Adjusted Free Cash Flow of $937 million, $330 million and $212 million, respectively;

In addition to implementing preventive health measures, including remote work, enhanced personal protective equipment and enhanced cleaning and sanitizing procedures, we implemented an Emergency Paid Leave program early in large part driventhe pandemic that granted additional paid time off for any employee impacted by our innovative product portfolio, including our Total Acoustics solutionsCOVID-19 during 2020, and our new Sustain family of products.a COVID Leave Program that continues to provide similar paid leave benefits for employees impacted by COVID-19 during 2021;

We also addressed key strategic prioritiesexpanded our industry-leading portfolio through an agreementthe acquisition of three design-focused companies (Turf Design, Moz Designs, and Arktura), each with custom metal and/or felt design and fabrication capabilities;

We advanced our digitalization initiatives through both optimization projects that enhance our customer service and support capabilities, as well as the launch of Kanopi, our direct-to-customer branch sales channel;

We launched 35 new products, including offerings under our Healthy Spaces initiative in response to sellCOVID-19, such as our European, Middle East, African,“24/7 Defend” portfolio of solutions designed to contain, clean and Pacific Rim businessesprotect the spaces where people live, work, learn, heal and play; and

We enhanced our regular quarterly dividend program by 5% and restarted our share repurchase program in October 2020 (after temporarily suspending it during the first quarter of 2020 due to Knauf International GmbH;COVID-19-based uncertainty).

As we look forward to 2021 and beyond, we believe there are many reasons to be excited for the closure of our St. Helens plant; and the accelerationfuture of our business development strategies, which resultedand our industry, particularly in view of the significant and central role that ceilings and walls play in the acquisitiondesign and performance of Tectum, Inc. in early 2017.

As we look ahead to our future as an Americas-focused business, we are well-positioned and poised for growth as wespaces. With a dedicated focus on servinginnovation in support of healthy spaces, an enterprise-wide focus on sustainability, and strategies and initiatives designed for long-term growth and value creation, our company is well-positioned for the challenges and opportunities of today and tomorrow.

Our Board of Directors and our management team looks forward to continuing our work to advance our strategic priorities, serve our customers, nowcreate value for our shareholders, cultivate and maintain an inclusive environment and culture, and, through our products and solutions, make a difference in the future, in both our Mineral Fiberspaces where people live, work, learn, heal and Architectural Specialties segments, with an experienced leadership team, industry-leading innovation and a strong financial position.play.

At this year’s Annual Shareholders’ Meeting, I will step down as a director and Chairman of the Board. It has been an honor to serve as Chairman since 2010, following my tenure as independent lead director. I have had the great pleasure to closely observe our Company emerge from bankruptcy, separate the flooring business into an independent publicly traded company and transition into an Americas-focused total ceilings and wall solutions provider.

At this year’s2021 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting, we will vote on the election of directors, vote to ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, and vote on anon-binding advisory basis on the compensation of our named executive officers. Please refer to the proxy statement for detailed information on each of the matters to be acted on at the meeting. meeting virtually via the Internet.

Your vote is important, and we strongly urge you to cast your vote. For most items, including the election of directors, your shares will not be voted if you do not provide voting instructions via the Internet, by telephone, or by returning a proxy or voting instruction card. We encourage you to vote promptly, even if you plan to attend the meeting.meeting virtually via the internet.

On behalf of your Board of Directors, thank you for your continued support of Armstrong World Industries and your participation in this year’s Annual Meeting.support.

Very truly yours,

 

LOGOLOGO

James J. O’ConnorLarry S. McWilliams

Chairman of the Board


LOGO

NOTICE OF 20182021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

Time and Date

8:00 a.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, July 12, 2018June 24, 2021

 

Attendance

Online atwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/awi2018awi2021, or in person at 2500 Columbia Avenue, Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603

 

Record Date

April 20, 201819, 2021

 

Agenda 

Items of Business

  

Board Recommendation

 

1.  Elect as directors the nine (9) nominees named in the attached proxy statement

  FOR EACH DIRECTOR NOMINEE
 

2.  Ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 20182021

  FOR
 

3.  Approve, on an advisory basis, our executive compensation program

  FOR

 

How To Vote

 Please act as soon as possible to vote your shares, even if you plan to attend the annual meeting via the Internet or in person.Internet.

 

 

 

Your broker willnot be able to vote your shares with respect to the election of directors unless you have given your broker specific instructions to do so. We strongly encourage you to vote.

 

 

 

You may vote via the Internet, by telephone, or, if you have received a printed version of these proxy materials, by mail.

 

 

 

See “ADDITIONAL MEETING INFORMATION” on page 5768 of this proxy statement for further information.

 

Attending the Meeting

via the Internet:

 

Instructions on how to attend and participate via the Internet, including how to demonstrate proof of stock ownership, are posted atwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/awi2018awi2021.

 

Shareholders may vote and submit questions while attending the meeting on the Internet.

in person:

Proof of Armstrong World Industries, Inc. stock ownership and photo identification will be required to attend the annual meeting.

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF

PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING

TO BE HELD ON JULY 12, 2018:JUNE 24, 2021:

The Notice of Annual Meeting, this Proxy Statement and

the Company’s 20172020 Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

ITEM 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

   1 

Director Nominees

   2 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

9

Corporate Governance Principles and Other Corporate Governance Documents

9

Director Independence

9

Board’s Role in Risk Management Oversight

9

Board’s Role in Succession Planning

10

Board Leadership Structure

10

Communication with the Board

10

Board Meetings and Committees

   11 

Audit CommitteeCorporate Governance Principles and Other Corporate Governance Documents

   11 

Finance CommitteeDirector Independence

11

Board’s Role in Risk Management Oversight

11

Board’s Role in Strategic Planning

   12 

Management Development and Compensation CommitteeBoard’s Role in Succession Planning

   12 

Nominating and Governance CommitteeBoard Leadership Structure

   12 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider ParticipationCommunication with the Board

   13 

Certain Relationships and Related Party TransactionsShareholder Outreach

   13 

Shareholder-Recommended Director CandidatesBoard Meetings and Committees

   14 

MANAGEMENTAudit Committee

   15 

Directors and Executive OfficersFinance Committee

   15 

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORSManagement Development and Compensation Committee

15

Nominating and Governance Committee

   16 

Other Committees

16

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

16

Review of Related Person Transactions

16

Policy on majority Voting in the Election of Directors

16

Mandatory Retirement Age

17

Shareholder-Recommended Director Compensation TableCandidates

   17 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS, MANAGEMENT AND DIRECTORS

18

Certain Beneficial Owners

18

Management and DirectorsSUSTAINABILITY

   19 

Directors – Aggregate OwnershipMANAGEMENT

   2023

Directors and Executive Officers

23 

Stock Ownership GuidelinesCOMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

   2024

Director Compensation Table

25 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS, MANAGEMENT AND DIRECTORS

26

Certain Beneficial Owners

26

Management and Directors

27

Directors – Aggregate Ownership

28

Stock Ownership Guidelines

29

ITEM  2 – RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

   2230 
 


LOGO

PROXY STATEMENT

This proxy statement was prepared under the direction of our Board of Directors (“Board”) to solicit your proxy for use at the 20182021 Armstrong World Industries, Inc. annual meeting of shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”). When we refer to “we,” “our,” “us,” “Armstrong” and the “Company” in this proxy statement, we are referring to Armstrong World Industries, Inc. This proxy statement and the related materials are first being distributed to shareholders on or about May 7,, 2018.

On November 20, 2017, we announced the sale of our businesses and operations in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (including Russia) and the Pacific Rim (the “International Business”), including the corresponding businesses and operations conducted by Worthington Armstrong Venture, a Delaware general partnership (“WAVE”), in which we hold a fifty percent (50%) interest, to Knauf International GmbH (“Knauf”). Following the sale of our International Businesses, which we currently expect to close during the third quarter of 2018, Armstrong will be an Americas-focused ceilings and wall buildings products company, and the leader in the design, innovation and manufacturer of commercial and residential ceiling, wall and suspension solutions. 2021.

At the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2017“2020 Annual Meeting”), which was held on July 13, 2017,June 25, 2020, our shareholders electedre-elected Stan A. Askren, Victor D. Grizzle, Tao Huang, Barbara L. Loughran, Larry S. McWilliams, James C. Melville, James J. O’Connor, John J. Roberts, Gregory P. Spivy,Wayne R. Shurts, Roy W. Templin and Cherryl T. Thomas to the Board.

 

ITEM 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

On the recommendation of the Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSocial Responsibility Committee (“Governance Committee”), our Board has nominated the nine directorspersons listed below for election at the Annual Meeting. Mr. James J. O’Connor, who isMeeting, all of whom are currently Chairmandirectors of the Board, will not stand for reelection at the Annual Meeting. Effective as of Mr. O’Connor’s resignation from the Board at the Annual Meeting, theCompany. The size of the Board will be decreased from ten tois nine members. TheAll nominees, include eight independent directors, as determined by the Board in accordance with the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) listing standards and our Corporate Governance Principles. The ninth nominee isexception of our President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Victor D. Grizzle.Grizzle, have been determined by the Board to be independent under the guidelines of the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and our Corporate Governance Principles. Each nominee’s term would, if elected, run from the date of his or her election until our next annual shareholders’ meeting and until the election at such annual meeting and qualification of his or her successor, or until his or her successor, if any, is electedearlier disqualification, resignation, removal, death or appointed.incapacity. We have no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unwilling or unable to serve if elected.

The Governance Committee performs an assessment of the qualifications and experience needed to properly oversee the interests of the

Company. In doing so, the Governance Committee believes that aligning director qualifications, experience and skill sets with our business, strategy, risks and strategyopportunities in addition to the functional responsibilities of the Board is essentialnecessary to formingmaintaining a boardBoard of directorsDirectors that adds value forremains capable of effectively performing its oversight and decision making responsibilities on behalf of the Company and its shareholders. While our

As part of its annual Board does not have a formal diversity policy with respect to director nominations, itevaluation process, the Governance Committee solicits the view of the entire Board and of senior management regarding Board composition and factors the responses received into its Board succession planning and refreshment process.

Our Board believes that a board of directors composed of individuals with diverse attributes and backgrounds enhances the quality of our Board’s deliberations and decisions. Our Board has an expansive view of diversity, going beyond the traditional concepts of race, gender and national origin, and emphasizing a diversity of viewpoints, educational backgrounds and professional experiences. Our Board believesrecognizes that this diversity, coupled with strong personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, results in a board of directors that is well-qualified to guide the Company with good business judgment.

AWI 2021 Proxy Statement    1


ITEM 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (CONTINUED)

The Governance Committee expects each of the Company’s directors to have proven leadership, sound judgment, integrity and a commitment to the success of the Company. In evaluating director candidates and considering incumbent directors for

AWI 2018 Proxy Statement    1


ITEM 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS(CONTINUED)

nomination to the Board, the Governance Committee considers a variety of factors. These include each nominee’s independence, financial

literacy, personal and professional accomplishments, and experience in light of the needs of the Company. For incumbent directors,

the factors also include past performance on our Board and contributions to their respective committees. Our Board is also particularly interested in maintaining a mix of skills and qualifications that include the following:

 

 

  

Public Company CEO or COO within past 5 years

 

  

Senior Executive Leadership

 

  

Manufacturing & Distribution Operations

 

  

Financial Literacy

 

  

Significant International Experience

  

Finance and Capital Markets Transactions

 

  

Technology

 

  

M&A

 

  

Risk Management

 

  

Corporate Governance/Law

 

Each director nominee’s biography in the pages that follow includes notable skills and qualifications that contributed to his or her selection as a nominee. Director skills and qualifications are also featured in the chart immediately following the biographies.

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

Composition of Board Nominees:

 

89% Independent

22% Women

11% Black

11% Asian

7 years average tenure

62.6 years average age

OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTEFOR THE ELECTION OF THE FOLLOWING NOMINEES:

 

Name  Age   Director Since  Committee(s)†  Independent^   Age*   Director Since  Committee(s)†  Independent^ 

Stan A. Askren

   57   2008  MDCC‡                       60   2008  AC, FC, MDCC‡                   ✓ 

Victor D. Grizzle

   56   2016       59   2016  —    

 

Tao Huang

   55   2010  AC, FC                       58   2010  FC, NGSRC                   ✓ 

Barbara L. Loughran

   57   2019  AC, FC, MDCC                   ✓ 

Larry S. McWilliams

   62   2010  AC, MDCC                       65   2010  FC                   ✓ 

James C. Melville

   66   2012  FC, MDCC, NGC‡                       69   2012  FC,

MDCC, NGSRC‡

                   ✓ 

John J. Roberts

   73   2006  AC‡, NGC                    

Gregory P. Spivy

   49   2014  FC, MDCC                    

Wayne R. Shurts

   61   2019  AC, FC, MDCC                   ✓ 

Roy W. Templin

   57   2016  AC, FC‡, MDCC                       60   2016  AC‡, FC‡,

NGSRC

                   ✓ 

Cherryl T. Thomas

   71   2016  AC, MDCC                       74   2016  FC, MDCC,
NGSRC
                    ✓ 

*

As of March 31, 2021

Committees: AC (Audit); FC (Finance); MDCC (Management Development & Compensation); NGCNGSRC (Nominating, Governance & Governance)Social Responsibility)

^

As defined in NYSE listing standards and our Corporate Governance Principles

Denotes Chair of the Committee

 

 
2          AWI 20182021 Proxy Statement 


ITEM 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS(CONTINUED)

LOGO

AWI 2021 Proxy Statement    3


ITEM 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (CONTINUED)

 

All nominees currently serve as directors. Information concerning the nominees is provided below:

 

LOGO          

STAN A. ASKREN

Director since: 2008

Age: 5760

 

Independent

Mr. Askren has beenis currently CEO and Founder of Quiet Trail Advisors, a private, senior level strategy and lean business advisory practice. He also serves as an advisor and lean business consultant for Lean Focus, LLC. Mr. Askren served as the chairman and CEO of HNI Corporation (“HNI”), the second largest office furniture manufacturer in the world from 2004 until December 31, 2018 and the nation’s leading manufacturer and marketeras CEO of hearth products, sinceHNI from 2004 and president since 2003.until July 2018, when he retired from HNI. Previously, he was the president of HNI from 2003 to April 2018, and executive vice president of HNI from 2001 to 2003. Mr. Askren hashad worked at HNI for 2627 years, including as vice president of marketing, vice president of human resources, and as an executive vice president and president of HNI’sits hearth products operatingbusiness segment. Mr. Askren has also worked in several industries and previously held multiple executive management and general management positions with Emerson Electric and Thomson S.A. and HNI. Mr. Askren also serves on the boardsboard of directors of Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc., a commercial duty automatic transmission and hybrid propulsion systems manufacturer (since 2015), the Business and Institutional Furniture Manufacturers Association (past chair) and the Iowa Business Council (past chair)2016). Mr. Askren formerly served on the board of directors of the Iowa Heritage Foundation.Foundation, the Business and Institutional Furniture Manufacturer’s Association (past chair), the Iowa Business Council (past chair) and Arctic Cat Corporation. Mr. Askren brings to our Board extensive operating, senior executive leadership, manufacturing, sales and distribution and, lean business expertise, as well as valuable insights from his experience as a public company chief executive officer.

LOGO          

VICTOR D. GRIZZLE

Director since: 2016

Age: 5659

 

 

 

Mr. Grizzle was appointed as our President and Chief Executive Officer on March 30, 2016. Previously, Mr. Grizzle served as Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer of Armstrong Building Products, a business unit of Armstrong, since January 2011. Prior to joining Armstrong, Mr. Grizzle served as Group President of Global Engineered Support Structures Coatings & Tubing and President of International Division for Omaha at Valmont Industries, Inc., an infrastructure and agricultural equipment manufacturer, since January 2006. Prior to Valmont, he served as President of the Commercial Power Division of EaglePicher Corporation, a manufacturing and resource extractive company. Before that, Mr. Grizzle spent 16 years at General Electric Corporation, where he served as an American business leader for General Electric’s Silicones Division. Mr. Grizzle also serves on the board of directors of Franklin Electric, a global leader in the production and marketing of systems and components for water and automotive fuels. As President and Chief Executive Officer of AWI, Mr. Grizzle provides our Board with significant insight regarding our operations, strategic planning and operational design. In addition, Mr. Grizzle brings to our Board broad leadership and business expertise, as well as comprehensive experience in global operations and manufacturing matters.

 

 

AWI 2018 Proxy Statement4          3AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


ITEM 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS(CONTINUED)

 

LOGO          

TAO HUANG

Director since: 2010

Age: 5558

 

Independent

Mr. Huang is the CEO of Supernova Companies, a financial technology company based in Chicago. He was previously the chief operating officer of Morningstar, Inc., a leading independent provider of investment research, until his retirement in December 2010. Mr. Huang spent almost 20 years with Morningstar, taking on increasing levels of responsibility from his start as an entry level technical programmer. He was named director of technology in 1992 and chief technology officer in 1996; he started Morningstar’s International Operation in 1998, held the position of president of International Division until 2000; he was promoted as the Company’s chief operating officer in October 2000 and served in this position until his retirement. Mr. Huang led Morningstar initiatives enabling significant growth, both organically and through acquisition, and oversaw continuous improvements in the operations of the firm’s core businesses. Mr. Huang is a founder and managing partner of Range Light, LLC, an investment firm (since 2012). Mr. Huang also serves on the board of directors of Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc., a publicly-traded real estate investment trust (since 2015) and Principal Mutual Funds, an asset management firm (since 2013). Mr. Huang brings to our Board expertise developed from his experience in a data-intense and technology-driven organization managing growth and integration of acquisitions, as well as experience in international operations.

LOGO         

BARBARA L. LOUGHRAN

Director since: 2019

Age: 57

Independent

Ms. Loughran served as a partner with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) from 1998 until her retirement in June 2018. Ms. Loughran has held various positions at PwC, including serving in its National Office from 2016 to 2018 and from 2000 to 2003, as Industrial Products Business Unit Leader of PwC’s New York Metro market from 2013 to 2015, and as Retail & Consumer Business Development Leader of PwC’s New York Metro market from 2010 to 2012. As a client service partner, Ms. Loughran led the global relationship and audit of numerous large, publicly-traded companies across a broad range of industries, and led the National Office effort on leveraging new and innovative technologies. Ms. Loughran also serves on the board of directors of Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., a publicly-traded engineering company, where she serves as chair of the Audit Committee. Ms. Loughran brings to our Board an extensive public accounting background, financial and capital markets expertise, and experience in mergers and acquisitions, risk management, and financial oversight and reporting.

AWI 2021 Proxy Statement    5


ITEM 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (CONTINUED)

LOGO          

LARRY S.
MCWILLIAMS

Director since: 2010

Age: 6265

 

Independent

 

Mr. McWilliams has been the Co-Chief Executive Officer of Compass Marketing, Inc. since 2012 and was previously the president and chief executive officer of Keystone Foods, a producer of proteins, from May 2011 to May 2012. From May 2005 to October 2010, he served as a senior vice president at Campbell Soup Company and subsequently became the president of Campbell International, responsible for all of Campbell Soup’s business in Europe, Latin America and Asia Pacific. Mr. McWilliams joined Campbell Soup in March 2001 as senior vice president – sales and chief customer officer, overseeing the company’s relationships with its global retail partners. In April 2003, he assumed the position of president – North America Soup. Mr. McWilliams was named senior vice president and president – Campbell USA in March 2004. Prior to Campbell Soup, Mr. McWilliams held positions at Coca-Cola from 1995 to 2001 and the Pillsbury Company from 1993 to 1995. Mr. McWilliams has also served on the board of directors of Armstrong Flooring, Inc. (“AFI”) since April 1, 2016.2016, and formerly served as its interim chief executive officer. Mr. McWilliams formerly served on the Boards of Directors of Godiva Chocolatiers International, a privately held company, and Bob Evans Farms, a full-service restaurant company, and the Board of Governors of St. Joseph’s University Food Marketing Council and the Grocery Manufacturers’ Association’s Industry Affairs Council. Mr. McWilliams offers our Board senior executive leadership capabilities and experience, as well as extensive knowledge of sales, marketing, customer service relationships, international markets and distribution channels.

4    AWI 2018 Proxy Statement


ITEM 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS(CONTINUED)

LOGO          

JAMES C. MELVILLE

Director since: 2012

Age: 6669

 

Independent

 

Mr. Melville is a member of the Minneapolis-based law firm of Kaplan, Strangis and Kaplan, P.A., where he has practiced in the corporate governance, mergers and acquisitions, securities and financial areas since 1994. Prior to joining Kaplan, Strangis and Kaplan, P.A., Mr. Melville practiced with Dorsey and Whitney in their Minneapolis and London, England offices. Mr. Melville previously served as a member of our Board from September 2009 until July 2010 and now also serves on the board of directors of AFI (since April 1, 2016). Mr. Melville is active in numerous local and civic organizations and their boards. Mr. Melville is also a National Association of Corporate Directors Board Leadership Fellow. Mr. Melville served as an observer of our Board on behalf of the Armstrong World Industries, Inc. Asbestos Personal Injury Settlement Trust (the “Trust”) from August 2010 until February 2012. Mr. Melville brings to our Board extensive knowledge of thecorporate law, mergers and acquisitions, executive compensation, and corporate governance matters, as well as international experience and financial acumen. He has also gained intimate knowledge of the Company through his prior service on our Board and his prior role as a board observer for the Trust.

LOGO         

JOHN J. ROBERTS

Director since: 2006

Age: 73

Independent

Mr. Roberts served as global managing partner for PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP from 1998 until his retirement in June 2002. Mr. Roberts held numerous positions at Coopers & Lybrand LLP from 1967 until its merger with Pricewaterhouse LLP in 1998. From 1994 to 1998, Mr. Roberts served as one of three members of the Office of the chairman of Coopers & Lybrand’s United States operations. Prior to that time, Mr. Roberts held other positions at Coopers & Lybrand, including deputy vice chairman, vice chairman and managing partner. While serving in various executive capacities at PricewaterhouseCoopers, Mr. Roberts performed and supervised audit, tax and business consultative services, and developed extensive expertise in public company audits and financial reporting matters. Mr. Roberts serves on the boards of directors and audit committees of the following companies: Safeguard Scientifics, Inc., a provider of capital as well as strategic, operational and management resources to growth-stage businesses (since 2003; also serves on the compensation committee and nomination and governance committee), the Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, a business trust with primary investment focus on retail shopping malls (since 2003; also serves on the compensation committee), and Vonage Holdings Corporation, a provider of communications services (since 2004; also serves as lead director). Mr. Roberts previously served on the board of directors of Sicor, Inc. (2002 to 2004) and served as a director of our former holding company, Armstrong Holdings, Inc. (2003 to 2006). Mr. Roberts brings to our Board an extensive public accounting background, financial expertise, experience as an accounting executive and as a board member of businesses in diverse industries, and risk management, strategic planning and corporate governance capabilities.Board.

 

 

AWI 2018 Proxy Statement6          5AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


ITEM 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS(CONTINUED)

 

LOGOLOGO          

GREGORY P. SPIVYWAYNE R. SHURTS

Director since: 20142019

Age: 4961

 

Independent

Mr. Spivy isShurts served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer at Sysco Corporation, a Partner of ValueAct Capital.publicly-traded global leader in food service distribution, from 2012 until February 2019. Prior to joining ValueAct Capital in September 2004,this, Mr. Spivy worked with Gryphon Investors,Shurts served as Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer at SUPERVALU, a private equity fund with $500 million in investments. Previously, Mr. Spivy waspublicly traded U.S. grocery retailer and wholesaler, from 2010 to 2012, and Chief Information Officer at Cadbury PLC, a Managing Director at Fremont Partners, a private equity firm.British multinational confectionary company, from 2008 to 2010. Prior to joining Fremont Partners,this, Mr. Spivy wasShurts has held various roles at Nabisco, including in finance, sales, supply chain, marketing, and technology. Mr. Shurts served on the board of directors of Con-Way Incorporated in 2015 until its acquisition by XPO Logistics Inc., where he served as a Director with The Bridgeford Group, and began his career in the mergers and acquisitions department of Lehman Brothers. Mr. Spivy is the former chairman of Seitel, Inc., (from 2006 to 2017), the former chairman of MSD Performance, Inc.,technology expert and a former directormember of Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (from 2015 to 2017), KAR Auction Services, Inc., MDS, Inc., MSC Software Corp.its Audit Committee and PRA International.Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr. Spivy is also the Chair of the Board of Directors of Matriculate, a charitable organization dedicated to sending high-achieving,low-income high school students to college. Mr. SpivyShurts brings to our Board hisextensive technology experience as a director of other publicformer Chief Information Officer, and private corporations, his advisory experience with ValueAct Capital’s portfolio companies, as well as his extensive financial services industry experience generally.in applying technology to improve and successfully transform business processes.

LOGO          

ROY W. TEMPLIN

Director since: 2016

Age: 5760

 

Independent

Mr. Templin served as Chairman of the Board of Directors ofCon-Way Incorporated, (NYSE:CNW), a multinational freight transportation and logistics company, from January 2014 until its acquisition by XPO Logistics Inc. in 2015. He previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Whirlpool Corporation, (NYSE:WHR), a multinational manufacturer and marketer of home appliances, from 2004 to 2012, and as Vice President and Controller of Whirlpool Corporation from 2003 to 2004. Prior, he served as Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer of Kimball International, Inc. He currently serves on the Board of Trustees of the Goldman Sachs Mutual Funds. Mr. Templin brings to our Board extensive experience as a senior executive, public company board member and executive of manufacturing and distribution industries, as well as experience in risk management, strategic planning, finance, and mergers and acquisitions.

 

 

6AWI 2021 Proxy Statement          AWI 2018 Proxy Statement7


ITEM 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS(CONTINUED)

 

LOGO          

CHERRYL T. THOMAS

Director since: 2016

Age: 7174

 

Independent

Ms. Thomas is the Chief Strategy Officer and Vice President of TheArdmore Roderick, Group, a Chicago-based civil engineering firm and, prior to The Roderick Group’s merger with Ardmore Associates, LLC, previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Ardmore Associates, LLC, where she was responsible for all financial, operational and management activities since 2003. Prior to founding Ardmore Associates, Ms. Thomas served as chairman of the board of the United States Railroad Retirement Board from 1998 until 2003, and as commissioner of the department of buildings of the city of Chicago from 1989 until 1994. Ms. Thomas also serves on the board of directors of Wintrust Bank, a banking corporation, where she is a member of their credit and audit committees. Ms. Thomas serves on the boards of numerous local and civic organizations and foundations, including the Lyric Opera of Chicago (since 2007), the Chicago Zoological Society (since 2000), the Polk Bros Foundation (since 2009), the Brach Foundation (since 2015) and the Big Shoulders Foundation (since 2013). Ms. Thomas brings to our Board significant senior executive leadership experience, as well as relevant experience in manufacturing, distribution and risk management.

 

 

AWI 2018 Proxy Statement    7


ITEM 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS(CONTINUED)

Skills and Qualifications of Board of Directors

LOGO

 
8          AWI 20182021 Proxy Statement 


ITEM 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (CONTINUED)

Skills and Qualifications of Board of Directors

LOGO

LOGO

AWI 2021 Proxy Statement    9


ITEM 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (CONTINUED)

LOGO

10    AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES AND OTHER CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS

Our Corporate Governance Principles include guidelines regarding the responsibilities, duties, service and qualifications of our Board, the determination of a director’s independence and any conflict of interests, Board access to management and independent advisors, director compensation and stock ownership requirements, Board committees and other matters relating to corporate governance. Our Corporate Governance Principles are available on our website under “About Us” and then “Governance” or at https://www.armstrongceilings.com/corporate/governance.html. Also available at the same location on our website are the charters of the Audit Committee, the Finance Committee, the Management Development and Compensation Committee (“Compensation Committee”), and the Governance Committee of the Board, the Armstrong Code of Business Conduct and the Armstrong Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals. Our website is not part of this proxy statement and references to our website address in this proxy statement are intended to be inactive textual references only.

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

It is the policy of the Company that our Board consist of a majority of directors who are not employees and are independent under all applicable legal and regulatory requirements, including the independence requirements of the NYSE. For purposes of evaluating the independence of directors, in accordance with our Corporate Governance Principles, our Board will consider all relevant facts and circumstances in making an independence determination, and not merely from the standpoint of the director, but also from that of persons or organizations with which the director has an affiliation. Consistent with our Corporate Governance Principles, to be considered “independent,” the Governance Committee has established qualifications to assist in the determination, which either meet or exceed the independence requirements of the NYSE.

Our Board has determined that all of our directors,director-nominees, with the exception of Mr. Grizzle, our President and CEO, are independent under NYSE listing standards and our Corporate Governance

Principles. In addition, our Board has further determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the

Finance Committee and the Governance Committee are independent within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards, any applicable minimum standards required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and enhanced standards required for membership on such committees by our Bylaws, namely that directors serving on such committees meet the independence criteria under both NYSE rules and Rule10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act.

BOARD’S ROLE IN RISK MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT

Our Board oversees the Company’s risk profile and management processes for assessing and managing risk, both as a full Board and through its committees, which meet regularly and report to the full Board. Management is charged with managing risk through robust internal policies and controls.

Enterprise Risk Management The Company has maintainedactively maintains an enterprise risk management program since 2005.program. Risk management is an integral part of the Company’s culture. Management’s role is to identify, mitigate, guide and review the efforts of our business units, consider whether the residual risks are acceptable, and approve plans to deal with serious risks. Our Board’s role in risk management is to review the performance and functioning of the Company’s overall risk management efforts and management’s establishment of appropriate systems for managing risk. Specifically, our Board reviews management’s:our:

 

identification of macro-, industry- and company-level developments and considerations in risk identification, assessment and mitigation;

processes to identify matters that create or reveal inappropriate risk to achieving our business plans;

 

processes to assess the likelihood and impact of such risks in order to prioritize them;

 

identification of major risks, and how we define “major;”

them, and our formulation of mitigation strategies;

 

identification of primary risk mitigation owners;

and

 

mitigationmonitoring of major risks and our view of the resulting residual risk; and

monitoring of major risks.

Management provides its feedback on business unit risks during periodic business reviews and annual strategic planning discussions. Senior management periodically meets with designatedevolving risk mitigation owners and assesses control

landscape.
 

 

 

 AWI 20182021 Proxy Statement          911


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE(CONTINUED)

 

Pursuant to its charter, the Audit Committee has primary oversight responsibility with respect to the design of our enterprise risk management program, including for periodically reviewing the process, methodology, and tools used by management to identify, evaluate, organize, assess and mitigate significant risks.

Management regularly provides input and feedback on business segment risks during periodic business reviews and annual strategic planning discussions. Senior management regularly meets with designated risk mitigation owners to review and assess risk mitigation and control measures. In addition, senior management regularly reevaluatereevaluates the appropriateness of risk assessments and priorities. This process includes identifying risks that could prevent achievement of business goals orand strategic plans. Our internal audit groupteam uses the resulting information as a basis for developing its annual audit plan.

Cybersecurity RiskOur Board receives regular updates on cybersecurity risk and mitigation protocols from our Chief Information Officer. These updates include a review of our cybersecurity program and assessment framework, as well as periodic updates on our efforts regarding data loss prevention, regulatory compliance, data privacy measures, threat and vulnerability management, cyber-crisis management, employee training, and other related topics, as applicable.

Responsibilities of our Board and its Committees     In addition to audit and assurance reports provided by our internal audit team, our Board periodically reviews summary reports from senior management that assess the strategic, operational, infrastructure and external risks facing the Company. These reports generally utilize our Enterprise Risk Management framework to identify the likelihood and impact of such risks, and identify appropriate mitigation strategies and efforts. Each Board committee, consistent with its charter, reviews and evaluates risks associated with their respective areas of oversight responsibility, reports on those oversight activities to our Board, and assists our Board in overseeing theits ongoing monitoring and review of certainthose risks, that are particularly within its purview, including as described in “BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES” below.

BOARD’S ROLE IN STRATEGIC PLANNING

Our Board oversees and advises on the Company’s overall strategy, and annually reviews the strategic priorities and initiatives of each business segment. In evaluating significant investments or capital allocation decisions, the Board generally considers the Company’s strategic plan and the potential impact on long-term shareholder value creation.

BOARD’S ROLE IN SUCCESSION PLANNING

Our Board is actively engaged and involved in talent management. Our Board reviews the Company’s “Organization Vitality” initiatives in support of its business strategy at least annually. This includes a detailed discussion of the Company’s global leadership bench and succession plans with a focus on key positions at the senior officer level, including CEO. During 2017,2020, our Board and the Compensation Committee met on several occasions in furtherance of these initiatives. In addition, the committeeseach committee of the Board regularly discussdiscusses the talent pipeline for specific critical roles. High potential leaders are given exposure and visibility to Board members through formal presentations and informal events. More broadly, our Compensation Committee and our Board isare regularly updated on key talent indicators for the overall workforce, including diversity, recruiting and development programs.

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

Our Bylaws and Corporate Governance Principles provide our Board with the flexibility to determine what leadership structure works best for us, including whether the same individual should serve as both our Chairman and our CEO. In FebruarySince 2010, our Board has determined to split the positions of Chairman and CEO. Since that time, Mr. O’Connor, who had been independent Lead Director from February 2008 through February 2010, has served as Chairman and will continue to serve in that capacity until he steps down as Chairman at the Annual Meeting. The split of these positions allows Mr. Grizzle, our President and CEO, to focus on managing the business, while ourMr. McWilliams, as Chairman,

oversees our Board’s functions. Our Board will continue to evaluate its leadership and governance structure within the context of the specific needs of the business, current Board composition, and the best interests of the Company and our shareholders.

12    AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (CONTINUED)

Responsibilities of the Chairman include recruiting new Board members, overseeing the evaluation and compensation of the CEO, ensuring an appropriate succession plan, overseeing independent evaluation of risk, coordinating Board meeting schedules and agenda, chairing and leading the discussions at the meetings, and overseeing the annual performance evaluations of the Board, its committees and its individual members. The Chairman ensures information provided by management to the Board is sufficient for the Board to fulfill its duties and communicates with other directors on key issues and concerns outside of regularly scheduled meetings. The Chairman is also responsible for ensuring the effective functioning of theBoard committees through appropriate delegation to, and membership of, the committees. Finally, the Chairman provides effective leadership for our independent directors to facilitatefacilitates the independent oversight required by our Bylaws and Corporate Governance Principles, including by ensuring that:

 

a majority of our directors are independent;

 

all of the members of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Finance Committee and the Governance Committee are independent directors; and

 

the Board meets at regularly scheduled executive sessions, outside of the presence of management. OurMr. McWilliams, our Chairman, presides at these sessions.

In addition, each of the Board’s four standing committees regularly meet at similar executive sessions, at which the respective committee chairs preside.

COMMUNICATION WITH THE BOARD

Any person who wishes to communicate with the Board, the nonemployee directors as a group, or individual directors, including the Chairman, may direct a written communication to the attention of the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s

corporate offices at 2500 Columbia Avenue, Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603. The Corporate Secretary will forward these communications to the

10    AWI 2018 Proxy Statement


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE(CONTINUED)

intended recipient director(s), as appropriate. You may also send general messages to directors by email to directors@armstrongceilings.com. If you wish to send an email message to the Governance Committee, including a recommendation regarding a prospective director, please send the message to CorpGovernance@armstrongceilings.com. The Corporate Secretary will forward these messages, as appropriate.

SHAREHOLDER OUTREACH

The Company’s relationships with its shareholders and other stakeholders are a critical part of our corporate governance profile, and the Board recognizes the value of taking their views into account. Among other things, this engagement with the Company’s shareholders and other stakeholders helps the Board and management to understand the larger context and impact of the Company’s operations, learn about expectations for our performance, assess emerging issues that may affect our business or other aspects of our operations, and shape policy.

In 2016, we initiated a formal shareholder outreach program to obtain investor perspectives on key topics of interest, including corporate governance, our executive compensation, program, sustainability and other matters. On an annual basis, we intend to continue to solicit feedback from institutional investors, including asset managers, pension funds and social responsibility investors.

Shareholder communications and inquiries are shared with Company management, and with the Chairs of the Board and its Committee, as appropriate. In 2020, in response to certain communications or inquiries, members of Company management and our Board engaged in discussions with shareholders to discuss topics relating to corporate governance and executive compensation.

AWI 2021 Proxy Statement    13


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (CONTINUED)

LOGO

BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES

The Board met sixten times during 2017, one2020, five of which was awere special meeting.meetings.

There are four standing committees of the Board: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Finance Committee and the Governance Committee, each described below.

Each standing committee has a charter and consists solely of ‘independent’ or ‘outside’ directors who meet applicable independence standards required by the NYSE, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”(the “SEC”), and the Internal Revenue Service, and under our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. Each committee reports to the Board regularly and evaluates the

effectiveness of its performance annually. The membership of each committee is determined by the Board on the

recommendation of the Governance Committee. The Company’s Corporate Governance Principles provide that (i) directors who are currently fully employed should not serve on more than two other corporate boards, and (ii) other directors should not serve on more than four other corporate boards.

All director nominees who served on the Board during 20172020 participated in over 75% of the meetings of the Board and meetings of the Committees on which they served. Board members are expected to attend annual meetings in person or virtually, via the Internet. All Board members serving at the time attended the annual meeting in 2017.2020.

14    AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (CONTINUED)

Audit Committee    The Audit Committee met fivesix times during 2017.2020, one of which was a special meeting. The members of the Audit Committee are Roy W. Templin (Chair), Stan A. Askren, Barbara L. Loughran and Wayne R. Shurts. During 2020, Tao Huang and John J. Roberts (Chair), Tao Huang, Larry S. McWilliams, Roy W. Templinalso served as members of the Audit Committee until Mr. Huang’s appointment to the Governance Committee and Cherryl T. Thomas.Mr. Robert’s retirement from the Board, following the 2020 Annual Meeting. Under its charter, the Audit Committee:

 

oversees (i) auditing and accounting matters, including the selection, supervision and compensation of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and other independent auditors, (ii) the scope of the annual audits,non-audit services performed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, and (iii) the Company’s accounting practices and internal accounting controls;

 

has sole authority to engage, retain and dismiss the independent registered public accounting firm;

 

reviews and discusses with management and our independent registered public accounting firm the annual audited financial statements and quarterly financial statements included in our SEC filings;

 

assists the Board in monitoring the integrity of the Company’s financial statements and the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, independence and performance;

 

considers the integrity of and risks associated with overall financial reporting, legal compliance and disclosure processes; and

 

supervises and reviews the effectiveness of the Company’s internal audit and compliance functions, and compliance by the Company with applicable legal and regulatory requirements.

Each member of the Audit Committee meets the

AWI 2018 Proxy Statement    11


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE(CONTINUED)

NYSE and SEC financial literacy requirements. The Board has determined that each of Mr. RobertsMs. Loughran and Mr. Templin qualifies as an “Audit Committee Financial Expert” as defined pursuant to the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee regularly meets independently with the Company’s internal and independent auditors, with the leaders of the Company’s compliance function, and with management.

Finance Committee    The Finance Committee newly formed in 2017, met twofive times during 2017, one2020, three of which was awere special meeting.meetings. The members of the Finance Committee are Roy W. Templin (Chair), Stan A. Askren, Tao Huang, Barbara L. Loughran, Larry S. McWilliams, James C. Melville, Wayne R. Shurts and Gregory P. Spivy.Cherryl T. Thomas. During 2020, Larry S. McWilliams, Wayne R. Shurts and Cherryl T. Thomas were appointed to the Finance Committee following the 2020 Annual Meeting. Under its charter, the Finance Committee:

 

assists the Board in its oversight of the financial management of the Company, including material and strategic financial matters;

 

reviews the Company’s capital structure, including with respect to its debt and equity securities, financing arrangements and credit facilities;

 

reviews and considers the Company’s capital expenditures, dividend policy and other forms of distributions on the Company’s stock, and planningcapital deployment strategies; and

 

reviews financial terms of certain proposed mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, strategic investments and joint ventures.

Management Development and Compensation Committee    The Compensation Committee met sixseven times during 2017, one2020, two of which was awere special meeting.meetings. The members of the Compensation Committee are Stan A. Askren (Chair), Larry S. McWilliams,Barbara L. Loughran, James C. Melville, Gregory P. Spivy,Wayne R. Shurts and Cherryl T. Thomas. During 2020, Roy W. Templin and Cherryl T. Thomas.also served as a member of the Compensation Committee until his appointment as Chair of the Audit Committee following the 2020 Annual Meeting. During 2020, Barbara L. Loughran was appointed to the Compensation Committee following the 2020 Annual Meeting. Under its charter, the Compensation Committee:

 

oversees the design of our executive compensation and benefit programs and employment practices;

 

administers and makes recommendations regarding our incentive and equity compensation plans;

 

reviews and approves corporate goals and individual objectives relevant to the compensation of the CEO and evaluates the CEO’s performance relative to those goals and objectives, and recommends CEO compensation

to the independent directors based on the evaluation;

AWI 2021 Proxy Statement     

to the independent directors based on the evaluation;

    15


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (CONTINUED)

 

oversees the evaluation of the other executive officers and establishes their compensation levels in collaboration with the CEO;

 

reviews incentive compensation to confirm that such compensation does not encourage unnecessary risk-taking; and

 

monitors senior management succession planning.

Nominating, Governance and GovernanceSocial Responsibility Committee    The Governance Committee met fiveseven times during 2017.2020, two of which were special meetings. The members of the Governance Committee are James C. Melville (Chair), James J. O’Connor,Tao Huang, Roy W. Templin and Cherryl T. Thomas. During 2020, John J. Roberts. Mr. O’Connor will not be standing for reelection atRoberts also served as a member of the Governance Committee until his retirement from the Board in connection with the 2020 Annual Meeting. During 2020, Tao Huang was appointed to the Governance Committee following the 2020 Annual Meeting. Under its charter, the Governance Committee:

 

monitors the independence of nonemployee directors;

 

reviews and evaluates director candidates and makes recommendations to the Board concerning nominees for election as Board members;

 

establishesassists our Board in defining and assessing criteria and qualifications for the selection of candidates to serve on the Board;

 

recommends directors for appointment to Board committees;

 

makes recommendations to the Board regarding corporate governance matters;

 

reviews and makes recommendations to the Board regarding the compensation of nonemployee directors;

 

oversees the Company’s sustainability and corporate social responsibility programs, including reviewing and assessing related strategies, structures, policies, practices and performance;

oversees the Company’s director education and orientation programs; and

 

coordinates an annual self-evaluation of the performance of the Board and each committee through assistance from an independent, third-party advisor.

Other Committees    In addition to the four standing committees described above, members of the Board may meet on an ad hoc basis to discuss, review and, as appropriate, approve matters through other committees established by the Board. These ad hoc committees report to the Board and may addressreview subjects such matters as environmental considerations,matters, succession planning and crisis response.

12    AWI 2018 Proxy Statement


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE(CONTINUED)

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

None of the members of the Compensation Committee has ever been an officer or employee of the Company or its subsidiaries, or had any relationship with the Company that requires disclosure under applicable SEC regulations.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS ANDREVIEW OF RELATED PARTYPERSON TRANSACTIONS

There are no transactions with related persons, as defined in Item 404 of the SEC’s Regulation S-K (“Item 404”), to report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

We have written policies pertaining to related person transactions. Any related partyperson transaction that may arise is required to be reviewed and approved by the Governance Committee, who must have no connection with the transaction. Related partyperson transactions would include transactions by the Company or any subsidiary with any director, director nominee, executive officer, shareholders owning more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock, per share par value $0.01 (“Common Stock”), or immediate family member of any of the foregoing, and transactions with businesses affiliated with any director or director nominee that meet the specifications in Item 404 of RegulationS-K under the Exchange Act.404. The Chair of the Governance Committee has authority to approve transactions involving sums less than the disclosure threshold set in Item 404. The material details of any such matters are required to be disclosed to the Governance Committee at its next regular meeting.

Following the expiration of the Nomination Agreement between ValueAct Capital and the Company in 2016, Mr. Spivy was elected to the Board and continues to receive compensation pursuant to our nonemployee director compensation program. Mr. Spivy has directed that his cash retainers be directly paid to ValueAct Capital Management, L.P., and under an agreement with ValueAct Capital, Mr. Spivy is deemed to hold it for the benefit of ValueAct Capital Master Fund L.P., and indirectly for other members of the ValueAct Group.

POLICY ON MAJORITY VOTING IN THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

In February 2017, our Board adopted a Policy on Majority Voting as one of our Corporate Governance Principles. The Policy provides that in

16    AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


ITEM 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (CONTINUED)

an uncontested election of directors, any nominee

who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” his or her election will, within 10 business days following the certification of the shareholder vote, tender his or her written resignation to the Board. Such tendered resignation will be considered by the Governance Committee taking into account any factors or other information it considers appropriate and relevant and, within 60 days following the date of the shareholders’ meeting at which the election occurred, will make a recommendation to the Board concerning the acceptance or rejection of such resignation. The Board will take formal action on the Governance Committee’s recommendation no later than 90 days following the date of the shareholders’ meeting at which the election occurred. The Board will consider the information, factors and alternatives considered by the Governance Committee and such additional factors, information and alternatives as the Board deems relevant.

Following the Board’s decision on the Governance Committee’s recommendation, the Company, within four business days after such decision is made, will publicly disclose, in a current report on Form8-K filed with the SEC, the Board’s decision, and, if applicable, the Board’s reasons for rejecting the tendered resignation. A director whose resignation is accepted by the Board may not bere-appointed to fill the vacancy created by his or her resignation.

No director who is required to tender his or her resignation shall participate in the Governance Committee’s deliberations or recommendation, or in the Board’s deliberations or determination, with respect to accepting or rejecting his or her resignation as a director. If a majority of the members of the Governance Committee are required to tender their resignations, then the independent directors who are not required to tender their resignations will appoint an ad hoc Board committee from amongst themselves, consisting of such number of directors as they may determine to be appropriate, solely for the purpose of considering and making a recommendation to

the Board with respect to the tendered resignations. If such ad hoc committee would have been created but fewer than three directors would be eligible to serve on it, then the entire Board (other than the director whose resignation is being considered) will make the determination to accept or reject the tendered resignation without any recommendation from the Committee and without the creation of an ad hoc committee.

AWI 2018 Proxy Statement    13


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE(CONTINUED)

CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITYMANDATORY RETIREMENT AGE

AsIn October 2018, our Board, upon the recommendation of the Governance Committee, adopted a leading building products manufacturer, we are committedmandatory retirement age policy for directors within our Corporate Governance Principles such that a director may not stand for election, or be nominated to operatingserve, as a strong corporate citizen across all areasmember of our business. This commitment is reflected in our ongoing initiatives to design and develop sustainable ceiling and wall products and solutionsBoard after reaching the age of 75. At the time that a director reaches the age of 75, the director may complete his or her then current term but may not stand for every space.

Environmental Sustainability     We are committed to environmental sustainability and are committed to invest in products which drive towards healthier buildings and spaces. We were the first to develop a ceiling recycling program and since 1999, we have diverted more than 200 million square feet of used ceiling tiles from landfills. In 2017, we launched the industry’s first collection of high performance ceiling systems, SUSTAIN™, that are free of Red List chemicals per the Living Building Challenge 3.0 (including no added formaldehyde), have Declare labels, contribute to LEED®re-election v4 and meet the most stringent sustainability compliance standards.

Our effort to reduce and eliminate our environmental footprint throughout the world includes:

upcycling industry waste streams into our products so that we use more waste than we generate, and several of our facilities arezero-waste;

an annual energy reduction target that contributes to greenhouse gas reduction;

rainwater harvesting, water recycling and infrastructure improvements so we use less water;

the first LEED EB Platinum-certified building outside California, Energy Star rated buildings; and

being a founding member in the U.S Green Building Council.

Material Transparency    We are actively involved in developing tools and certifications our customers need to be able to fully assess our products including environmental product declarations and

product certifications and declarations, such as Cradle to Cradle, Declare and Global GreenTagCert™ and the most stringent sustainability compliance standards.

Safety    Safety is a core value at Armstrong; our goal is to have an injury free workplace. As a result of our safety programs, which are integrated into our business from top management to our workers in manufacturing plants, our OSHA recordable rate has been at world class levels for over a decade.

Social Impact    Armstrong World Industries created the Armstrong World Industries Foundation as its philanthropic arm in 1985. Since its inception, the foundation has awarded in excess of $50 million to 501(c)(3) organizations in communities where employees live and work, and that contribute to reaching under-served young people.

More information about our corporate and social responsibility efforts is available in the “Sustainability” section of our website at http://www.armstrongceilings.com.thereafter.

SHAREHOLDER-RECOMMENDED DIRECTOR CANDIDATES

The Governance Committee will consider director candidates nominated by shareholders. The procedures for recommending candidates are posted at https://www.armstrongceilings.com/corporate/nominating-governance-committee.html.en-us/about-us/board-committees.html. Shareholders who wish to suggest individuals for service on the Board are requested to review Article II, Section 4 of our Bylaws and supply the information required in (a) through (k) of that Section in a written request to the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s corporate offices at 2500 Columbia Avenue, Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603.

When evaluating the candidacy of nominees proposed by shareholders, the Governance Committee may request additional information as it may consider reasonable to determine the proposed nominee’s qualifications to serve as a member of the Board.

 

 

AWI 2021 Proxy Statement    17


ITEM 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (CONTINUED)

LOGO

 
1418          AWI 20182021 Proxy Statement 


SUSTAINABILITY

Our sustainability program complements our company purpose, namely to make a difference by contributing to healthier, safer spaces where people live, work, learn, heal and play. As a leader in the building products industry, we aim to transform the design and building of spaces so that businesses and communities can thrive, both today and into the future.

Our program is organized around three functional “pillars”: People, Planet and Product. Each pillar has adopted specific 2030 goals and key performance targets, and is led by a cross-functional steering committee responsible for assessing, selecting and prioritizing goals, establishing targets and developing roadmaps to achieve them, and monitoring progress against science-based metrics.

Our program pillars are focused on these key priorities and objectives:

Healthy and Circular Products    We are committed to responsible sourcing and providing transparency in our products. In addition, we will design our products to minimize waste and pollution, support recycling, repurposing or reuse; and contribute to the regeneration of natural systems.

Healthy Planet    All of our electricity sources will be renewable, and we will dramatically reduce the carbon and water impacts of our products and operations.

Thriving People and Communities    Our workforce will be safe, diverse, inclusive and fulfilled, and we will actively contribute to our local communities.

UNITED NATIONS SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS

The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs) are a collection of 17 interlinked global goals that aim to achieve a better and more sustainable future for all by 2030. We have conducted an analysis to understand how our activities align with the UN SDGs.

In 2021, we became a signatory to the United Nations Global Compact (UNGC) to demonstrate our commitment to collective action toward its

principles. We will include our first Communication on Progress with the release of our sustainability report later this year.

GOVERNANCE, CORPORATE LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT

The Governance Committee has responsibility for overseeing our corporate responsibility and sustainability programs and practices.

In 2019, we appointed a dedicated sustainability leader, Ms. Helen Sahi, as our Director of Sustainability. Reporting to Mark Hershey, our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, Ms. Sahi leads our program and is responsible for designing and implementing action plans towards our enterprise-wide goals. Ms. Sahi is an experienced sustainability leader, and has led similar initiatives for other publicly-traded manufacturers, integrating sustainability into the everyday fabric of company business and shaping sustainability vision and strategy.

OUR PLANET PILLAR

We recognize our responsibility to protect our shared planet: In order to create healthy buildings and spaces, we need a functioning and stable environment.

We continue to strengthen our sustainable practices, with a focus on sourcing responsibly and building circular manufacturing processes. We aim to minimize our environmental impact by reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and integrating more renewable energy sources. We are also limiting waste through innovative manufacturing processes and circular economy systems that bring new life to used products. Finally, we are thinking deliberately about how to optimize our water use and contribute positively to water management and restoration efforts where we operate.

Carbon    The threats we all face from climate change have never been more urgent. As world leaders struggle to coordinate a response to the crisis, companies have an opportunity to lead the way. We are committed to transparent action on the climate crisis, and in April 2021, we joined the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) to set goals in line with the Paris Agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate

AWI 2021 Proxy Statement    19


SUSTAINABILITY (CONTINUED)

Change. Working with the SBTi, we set an internal goal to meet a well below 2°C target and have committed to reducing Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions by 30% from a 2019 baseline. This would offset all of our electricity usage and a portion of our natural gas usage. We are continuing to work with the SBTi to set a Scope 3 emissions goal that would help limit global warming to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels.

Water    While we do not operate in any areas considered “high water stress,” we are mindful of our opportunity to limit our resource consumption. As we upgrade our facilities, we are able to achieve greater efficiency of water and energy use. In 2014, we installed a new water filtration plant at our Marietta, Pennsylvania facility.

OUR PRODUCT PILLAR

We recognize that our products are an important component of helping our customers achieve their own key sustainability goals, and are committed to continuing to invest in solutions that meet our customers’ changing demand for building products, including seeking products free of chemicals of concern while continuing to meet high-performance standards.

SUSTAIN    Armstrong SUSTAIN® is the largest portfolio of high-performance ceiling solutions available today. All SUSTAIN products are free of chemicals of concern, meet low emission standards for indoor air quality, and offer material ingredient disclosures and environmental product declarations (EPDs). All SUSTAIN products contribute to meeting industry green building standards.

Product Transparency    We are committed to being transparent about the materials we use in our products. We collaborate with industry organizations to help develop leading sustainability standards, and we regularly engage third parties to test, assess, and certify our products to ensure we continue to meet the industry’s most stringent sustainability standards.

Our product transparency page provides all documentation required for a range of health and environmental certifications, standards and claims, including Health Product Declarations, EPDs, and Declare Labels. We also offer customer-focused tools to assist users in finding sustainable building options that meet their needs.

Circular Products    In nature, there is no waste. We have worked to integrate that principle into our product lifecycle for over two decades. We are committed to creating circular products and services that reduce or eliminate waste and pollution, keep products and materials in use longer and help to regenerate natural systems.

Since 1999, we have operated our Armstrong World Industries Ceiling Recycling Program. This program gives our customers and us an opportunity to recycle ceiling tiles at their end of life so that they can be remanufactured into new ceiling tiles. This has significantly reduced the need for virgin raw materials – by over a million tons to date – and diverts waste from landfills. This program also helps our customers meet their own waste reduction goals, and we provide calculators to help our customers measure the environmental impact and savings as a result of our program.

OUR PEOPLE PILLAR

We have long considered our employees to be an important stakeholder group. We strive to cultivate and maintain an environment that supports safe, healthy and fulfilled employees. We continue to work to further develop an inclusive culture and diverse workforce at all levels of the organization.

Safety    Safety has been a focus of ours since our founding, and it is paramount in everything we do. Guided by our Safety Policy, we have built a robust safety management system that regularly monitors our safety metrics so that we can quickly report and investigate any incidents, including near misses. This approach allows us to make timely changes to procedures and processes and identify best practices to be adopted company-wide.

One of our key priorities as we grow through acquisitions and integrate new companies is to embed our long-standing safety management systems and culture within each acquired organization.

COVID-19    In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruption on many fronts. All of our manufacturing facilities remained operational, while following governmental and local health authorities’ guidance. We implemented measures to minimize our employees’ exposure to the virus. These included encouraging remote work when possible, providing personal protective equipment

20    AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


SUSTAINABILITY (CONTINUED)

(including masks), limiting group meetings, restricting business travel, implementing enhanced cleaning and sanitizing procedures, and ensuring social distancing. Early in the pandemic, we implemented an Emergency Paid Leave program that granted additional paid time off for any employee impacted by COVID-19 during 2020. We subsequently implemented a COVID Leave Program effective January 1, 2021 that continues to provide similar paid leave benefits for employees impacted by COVID-19. Additional information regarding our COVID-19 response can be found on page 34 of this Proxy Statement.

Diversity    In order to achieve our mission, and to ensure that our design and building of spaces are fit for today and tomorrow, it is imperative that our employees reflect the society we serve across the dimensions of race, sex, ethnicity, age, gender or gender identity, sexual orientation, religion, disability, and veteran status. We believe that a workforce that brings diversity of thought and experiences produces the best and most innovative outcomes.

We have had robust affirmative action programs in place for decades, including self-reviews of our talent processes and outcomes to identify and action opportunities for improvement. We aim to integrate diversity and inclusion into our talent processes, from talent acquisition to employee engagement and development. We have made several commitments on diversity and inclusion in our sustainability goals and have embedded diversity and inclusion into our overall corporate strategy and community outreach. These commitments are supported by employee training and regular surveys, affinity groups, performance management and succession planning.

We equip our entire workforce with annual, mandatory antiharassment training, and provide a confidential toll-free ethics hotline to encourage and facilitate reporting of compliance issues.

THE ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES FOUNDATION

We created the Armstrong World Industries Foundation as our philanthropic arm in 1985. Today, the Foundation’s strategy is primarily focused on making a positive difference in the lives of people where they live, work, learn, heal and play, through awarding grants to qualified charitable

organizations that meet at least two of the following criteria:

Operate in communities where our employees live and work.

Dedicated to elevating the importance of healthy and sustainable spaces for people’s lives (for example, by renovating buildings to improve their spaces and, thereby, the quality of service they provide to the people they benefit).

Focus on those who are most in need, particularly under-served children (for example, through early childhood education programs).

Today, the Foundation’s mission is to support: (a) current and future employees and retirees through gift matching programs, hardship support, and emergency/disaster relief support; (b) communities in which we operate; and (c) the qualified charitable efforts of architects, designers, contractors and others in the building and construction community who are dedicated to elevating the importance of healthy and sustainable spaces for people’s lives.

Since its inception, the Foundation has awarded in excess of $50 million to qualifying 501(c)(3) organizations.

In December 2020, we made a charitable gift of $10 million dollars to the Foundation in support of its mission.

MORE INFORMATION

More information about our corporate and social responsibility programs is available in the “Sustainability” section of our website at http://www.armstrongceilings.com. Our website is not part of this proxy statement and references to our website address in this proxy statement are intended to be inactive textual references only.

Our Sustainability goals, key performance indicators, projects, plans, targets and expectations are aspirational and forward-looking. Statements of aspiration, future events or conditions are sometimes identified by the words “will,” “should,”

AWI 2021 Proxy Statement    21


SUSTAINABILITY (CONTINUED)

“intend,” “expect,” “estimate,” “believe,” “could,” “project,” “target” or other similar words or expressions. By their nature, they are based upon current plans, estimates and expectations that are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. As such, no guarantees or assurances are made that they will be achieved or successfully executed. Additionally, the Sustainability data, statistics and metrics included herein, unless otherwise specifically indicated, are non-audited estimates,

were not prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), have not been externally assured, continue to evolve and may be based on assumptions believed to be reasonable at the time of preparation, but should not be considered guarantees. Except to the extent required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking Sustainability statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

LOGO

22    AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


MANAGEMENT

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth information regarding individuals who serve as our executive officers as of April 1, 2018.2021.

 

Name  Age   Present Position and Business Experience During the Last Five Years*

Victor D. Grizzle

   5659   

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

President & CEO; Director since April 2016

Executive Vice President & CEO, Armstrong Building Products (2011 to March 2016)

Valmont Industries

Group President, Global Structures, Coatings and Tubing (2005)

Brian L. MacNeal

   5154   

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

Chief Financial Officer since April 2016

Vice President, Global Finance and CFO, Armstrong Building Products (2014 to April 2016)

Heartland Energy Solutions

Interim Chief Financial Officer (2013 to 2014)

Campbell Soup Company

Vice President of Finance (2011 to 2013)

David S. CooksonCharles M. Chiappone

   60

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

Senior Vice President, Americas since 2008

Charles M. Chiappone**

5558   

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

Senior Vice President, Ceilings and Wall Solutions since MarchApril 2018 Senior Vice President, Ceilings Solutions (March 2016

to April 2018) Vice President of Global Marketing & Commercial Excellence,

Armstrong Building Products

(January 2012 to March 2016)

Alloy Polymers, Inc.

President & CEO (2008 to 2012)

Mark A. Hershey

   4851   

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

Senior Vice President, Business Development since January 2020

Senior Vice President, General Counsel since July 2011

Chief Compliance Officer since February 2012

Secretary (July 2011 to June 2014; since April 2016)

Ricoh Americas Corporation

Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer & Secretary (2008)

Stephen F. McNamara

   5154   

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

Vice President, Controller since July 2008

Ellen R. Romano

   5760   

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

Senior Vice President, Human Resources since May 2013

Vice President, Human Resources, Armstrong Building Products (2009)

*

Information in parentheses regarding previously held positions indicates either the duration the Executive Officer held the position or the year in which service in the position began.

**In connection with the retirement of Mr. Cookson as of July 1, 2018, Mr. Chiappone was appointed as Senior Vice President, Ceiling and Wall Solutions, effective April 1, 2018.

All executive officers are elected by the Board to serve in their respective capacities until their successors are elected or until their earlier resignation or removal by the Board.

 

 

 AWI 20182021 Proxy Statement          1523


COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

 

In establishing compensation for our nonemployee directors, including the overall value of compensation and the mix of cash and equity, the Board analyzes competitive market data and any underlying director compensation trends generally, and compares our program to those of similarly sized companies in comparable industries. The Board is compensated through a combination of annual retainerscash and equity grantsannual retainers. Nonemployee directors receive more than half of their annual retainer in equity in order to align their compensation with the forminterests of stock units.shareholders. Directors do not receive meeting fees or perquisites. The Board believes that this level of compensation supports the Company’s ability to attract directors with suitable backgrounds and experiences. A director who is an officer or employee of the Company or its subsidiaries is not compensated for service on the Board or on any committee of the Board.

 

On an annual basis, the Governance Committee reviews the compensation program for nonemployee directors, including the 2008 Directors’ Stock Unit Plan, as amended (the “2008 Directors Stock Unit Plan”) and the 2016 Directors’ Stock Unit Plan, as amended (the “2016 Directors Stock Unit Plan”). The review includes an analysis of competitive market data and any underlying director compensation trends with assistance from an independent compensation consultant, as required. Following thata review in 2017,2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and based upon a recommendation by the Governance Committee, the Board approved an annuala reduction of 10% for the Annual Retainer (Cash) and Committee Chair Fee for the newly-formed Finance Committee of $10,000,Fees, each effective as of October 2017.June 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020.

 

 

The following table describes the elements of the compensation program for nonemployee directors in 2017:2020:

Director Compensation Program

 

Element Amount  Terms

Annual Retainer (Cash)

 

$90,00090,000*

$180,000140,000* (Chair)

  paid in quarterly installments, in arrears

Annual Retainer (Equity)

 

$105,000

$185,000145,000 (Chair)

  

annual (orpro-rated) grant of Director RSUs

•  2016 Directors Stock Unit Plan

   2016 and later grants  vest at one year anniversary or earlier change in control if serving on such date**date

•  pre-2011 grants deliverable six months following end of service (except removal for cause)

•  2011 and later grants deliverable on date of end of service (except removal for cause)

•  one share per one unit upon delivery

•  no voting power until delivered

•  dividend equivalent rights

Committee Chair Fees**

 

$20,00020,000* (AC; MDCC)

$10,00015,000* (FC; NGC)NGSRC)***

  paid in quarterly installments, in arrears

Special Assignment Fees

 

$2,500 per diem

($1,250 for less

than four hours)

  

may be paid in connection with:

•  one-on-one meetings with the CEO

•  plant visits

•  othernon-scheduled significant activities approved by the Chair

*

Reduced by 10% effective June 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020

**

Committees: AC (Audit); FC (Finance); MDCC (Management Development & Development); NGCNGSRC (Nominating, Governance & Governance)Social Responsibility)

 

***In prior years,

At Mr. Templin’s request upon his appointment as Chair of the Annual Retainer (Equity) grants were made pursuant to the 2011 Directors Stock Unit Plan, which didAC, he was paid a committee chair fee for his services as AC Chair but not provide for deferral of equity vesting, which would then vest at the one year anniversary or earlier change in control if serving on such date. Grants made under this planpre-2011 grants were deliverable six months following end of service (except removal for cause), while grants made 2011 and later were deliverable on date of end of service (except removal for cause).as FC Chair

 

 
1624          AWI 20182021 Proxy Statement 


COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS(CONTINUED)

 

Annual grants for the equity portion of the retainer are effective as of the first business day following the date of the Annual Meeting, and the amount of

each grant is determined by the NYSE closing price of our shares of Common Stock on that date.

 

Director Compensation Table – 20172020

 

Name

(a)

  Fees
Earned or
Paid
in Cash ($)
(b)
  Stock
Awards ($)(1)
(c)
  Option
Awards
($)(2)
(d)
  

Non-Equity
Incentive

Plan
Compensation
($)

(e)

  Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(3)(f)
  

All

Other
Compensation
($)(g)

  Total ($)
(h)
  

Fees

Earned or

Paid

in Cash ($)

(1)(b)

   

Stock

Awards ($)(2)

(c)

   

Option

Awards

($)(3)

(d)

   

Non-Equity

Incentive

Plan

Compensation

($)

(e)

   

Change in

Pension Value

and

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

($)(4)(f)

   

All

Other

Compensation

($)

(g)(5)

   

Total ($)

(h)

 

S. Askren

    110,000    105,000    —      —      —      —      215,000   104,500    105,000    —      —      —      24,768    234,268 

T. Huang

    90,000    105,000    —      —      —      —      195,000   85,500    105,000    —      —      —      24,262    214,762 

B. Loughran

   85,500    105,000    —      —      —      1,862    192,362 

L. McWilliams

    90,000    105,000    —      —      —      —      195,000   133,000    145,000    —      —      —      25,451    303,451 

J. Melville

    100,000    105,000    —      —      —      —      205,000   99,750    105,000    —      —      —      15,307    220,057 

J. O’Connor

    180,000    185,000    —      —      —      —      365,000

J. Roberts

    110,000    105,000    —      —      —      —      215,000

G. Spivy(4)

    90,000    105,000    —      —      —      —      195,000

J. Roberts(6)

   45,000    —      —      —      —      18,748    63,748 

W. Shurts

   85,500    105,000    —      —      —      1,426    191,926 

R. Templin

    92,500    105,000    —      —      —      —      197,500   102,000    105,000    —      —      —      1,426    208,426 

C. Thomas

    90,000    105,000    —      —      —      —      195,000   85,500    105,000    —      —      —      7,653    198,153 
(1)

Excludes amounts earned in fourth quarter of 2019 and paid in first quarter of 2020.

(2)

Represents amounts that are in units of our shares of Common Stock. The amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value for Director RSUs granted during the fiscal year, as calculated under the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. Under ASC Topic 718, the grant date fair value is calculated using the closing market price of our shares of Common Stock on the date of the grant. For the number of Director RSUs credited to each director’s account as of March 31, 2018,2021, see SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS, MANAGEMENT AND DIRECTORS, pages 1827 and 19.28.

(2)(3)

Directors do not receive stock options as part of their compensation for service on our Board.

(3)(4)

Under the 2016 Directors Stock Unit Plan, directors may elect to defer the equity compensation that they receive as part of their compensation for services on our Board.

(4)(5)Under an agreement with ValueAct Capital, Mr. Spivy is deemed

Represents cash dividend equivalent on vested and unvested stock units and phantom shares.

(6)

Elected not to receive the cash portion of his retainerstand for Board service and hold the Director RSUs for the benefit of ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P. and indirectly for (i) VA Partners I, LLCreelection as General Partner of ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P., (ii) ValueAct Capital Management, L.P. as the manager of ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P., (iii) ValueAct Capital Management, LLC as General Partner of ValueAct Capital Management, L.P., (iv) ValueAct Holdings, L.P. as the sole owner of the limited partnership interests of ValueAct Capital Management, L.P. and the membership interests of ValueAct Capital Management, LLC and2020 Annual Meeting. Information provided is as the majority owner of the membership interests of VA Partners I, LLC and (v) ValueAct Holdings GP, LLC as General Partner of ValueAct Holdings, L.P.2020 Annual Meeting.

 

 

 AWI 20182021 Proxy Statement          1725


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS, MANAGEMENT AND DIRECTORS

Certain Beneficial Owners

The following table sets forth information regarding persons or groups known to us to be beneficial owners of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock as of March 31, 20182021 or the date of any applicable reports filed by such persons or groups prior to that date. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with applicable rules of the SEC.

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner  

Amount and Nature

of Beneficial

Ownership

 

Percent of Class

Outstanding(1)

ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P.

One Letterman Drive, Building D,4th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94129

6,852,612(2)13.1%

Iridian Asset Management LLC

276 Post Rd. W.

Westport, CT 06880

5,739,634(3)11.0%

The Vanguard Group

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

3,601,807(4)6.9%

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.

100 E. Pratt Street

Baltimore, MD 21202

  6,834,039(2)3,198,611(5) 14.3%

Capital International Investors

333 South Hope Street, 55th Fl

Lost Angeles, CA 90071

  6.15,862,693(3)%12.3%

The Vanguard Group

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

4,231,848(4)8.8%

Lazard Asset Management LLC

30 Rockefeller Plaza

New York, NY 10112

3,712,200(5)7.8%

The London Company

1800 Bayberry Court, Suite 301

Richmond, VA 23226

2,741,512(6)5.7%

 

(1)

Based on 52,198,47647,828,464 shares of the Company’s Common Stock outstanding as of March 31, 2018,2021, as reported to the NYSE (61,374,320(62,639,609 shares reported, less 9,175,84414,811,145 shares held in treasury).

(2)On a Schedule 13D Amendment No. 2 filed with the SEC on March 14, 2018, ValueAct Master Fund, L.P. reported shared voting and dispositive power with respect to these shares of Common Stock. Shares reported as beneficially owned by ValueAct Master Fund are also reported as beneficially owned by (i) ValueAct Management L.P. as the manager of each such investment partnership, (ii) ValueAct Management LLC, as General Partner of ValueAct Management L.P., (iii) ValueAct Holdings, as the sole owner of the limited partnership interests of ValueAct Management L.P. and the membership interests of ValueAct Management LLC and as the majority owner of the membership interests of VA Partners I and (iv) ValueAct Holdings GP, as General Partner of ValueAct Holdings. Shares reported as beneficially owned by ValueAct Master Fund are also reported as beneficially owned by VA Partners I, as General Partner of ValueAct Master Fund. VA Partners I, ValueAct Management L.P., ValueAct Management LLC, ValueAct Holdings and ValueAct Holdings GP also, directly or indirectly, may own interests in one or more than one of the partnerships from time to time. By reason of such relationship ValueAct Master Fund is reported as having shared power to vote or to direct the vote, and shared power to dispose or direct the disposition of, these shares of Common Stock of the Company, with VA Partners I (only with respect to ValueAct Master Fund), ValueAct Management L.P., ValueAct Management LLC, ValueAct Holdings and ValueAct Holdings GP.
(3)

On a Schedule 13G Amendment No. 2 filed with the SEC on February 6, 2018, Iridian Asset Management LLC, David L. Cohen and Harold L. Levy reported that, as of December 31, 2017, they had shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 5,734,634 shares of Common Stock of the Company, and David L. Cohen reported that, as of December 31, 2017, he had sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 5,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company.

(4)On a Schedule 13G Amendment No. 24 filed on with the SEC on February 12, 2018, the VanguardGroup—23-1945930 reported, as of December 31, 2017, sole voting power with respect to 26,724 shares of Common Stock of the Company, shared voting power with respect to 5,067 shares of Common Stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 3,573,442 shares of Common Stock of the Company and shares dispositive power with respect to 28,365 shares of Common Stock as follows: Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner of 23,298 shares or .04% of the shares of Common Stock outstanding of the Company as a result of its serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts, Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner of 8,493 shares or 0.1% of the shares of Common Stock outstanding of the Company as a result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings.
(5)On a Schedule 13G filed on with the SEC on February 14, 2018,16, 2021, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. reported, as of December 31, 2017,2020, that it had sole voting power with respect to 437,0241,306,927 shares of Common Stock of the Company and sole dispositive power with respect to 3,198,6116,834,039 shares of Common Stock of the Company, and T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund, Inc. reported, as of December 31, 2017,2020, that it had sole voting power with respect to 2,749,7875,514,065 shares of Common Stock outstanding of the Company.

(3)

On a Schedule 13G Amendment No. 2 filed on with the SEC on February 16, 2021, Capital International Investors reported, as of December 31, 2020, that it had sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to 5,862,693 shares of Common Stock of the Company.

(4)

On a Schedule 13G Amendment No. 6 filed on with the SEC on February 10, 2021, the Vanguard Group—23-1945930 reported, as of December 31, 2020, that it had shared voting power with respect to 33,468 shares of Common Stock of the Company, sole dispositive power with respect to 4,159,329 shares of Common Stock of the Company and shared dispositive power with respect to 72,519 shares of Common Stock of the Company.

(5)

On a Schedule 13G Amendment filed with the SEC on February 10, 2021, Lazard Asset Management LLC reported that, as of December 31, 2020, it had sole voting power with respect to 2,551,657 shares of Common Stock of the Company and sole dispositive power with respect to 3,712,200 shares of Common Stock of the Company.

(6)

On a Schedule 13G Amendment No. 1 filed on with the SEC on February 16, 2021, The London Company reported, as of December 31, 2020, that it had sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to 2,448,525 shares of Common Stock of the Company, respectively, and shared dispositive power with respect to 292,987 shares of Common Stock of the Company.

 

 
1826          AWI 20182021 Proxy Statement 


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS, MANAGEMENT AND DIRECTORS(CONTINUED)

 

Management and Directors

The following table sets forth, as of March 31, 2018,2021, the amount of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by all directors, the Company’s named executive officers (“NEOs”) as identified in the “COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS” section on page 2628 and all directors and executive officers as a group in accordance with applicable SEC rules.

 

Name  Number of
Common
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
   Number of
Shares Subject
to Options(1)
Exercisable or
Which Become
Exercisable
Within 60 Days
 Total
Number of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned(2)
   Restricted
Stock
Units(3)/
Unvested
Options
   Total Common
Shares Beneficially
Owned Plus
Restricted Stock
Units and
Unvested Options
   

Number of

Common

Shares

Beneficially

Owned

  

Number of

Shares Subject

to Options(1)

Exercisable or

Which Become

Exercisable

Within 60 Days

 

Total

Number of

Shares

Beneficially

Owned(2)

  

Restricted

Stock

Units(3) /

Unvested

Options

  

Total Common

Shares Beneficially

Owned Plus

Restricted Stock

Units and

Unvested Options

Stan A. Askren

   2,612    *  2,612    31,116    33,728     7,532    **  7,532    30,283    37,815

Charles M. Chiappone

   4,514    11,992   16,506    31,206    47,712     26,725    —    26,725    18,301    45,026

David S. Cookson

   20,869    27,336   48,205    30,027    78,232 

Victor D. Grizzle

   35,990    130,309   166,299    228,233    394,532     267,752    79,951  347,703    121,339    469,042

Mark A. Hershey

   16,364    69,496   85,860    45,241    131,101     44,103    —    44,103    19,949    64,052

Tao Huang

   —      *  —      26,097    26,097     —      **  —      30,184    30,184

Barbara L. Loughran

    —      **  —      2,529    2,529

Brian L. MacNeal

   2,222    3,740   5,962    42,770    48,732     48,150    3,740  51,890    18,150    70,040

Larry S. McWilliams

   —      *  —      26,097    26,097     —      **  —      31,741    31,741

James C. Melville

   4,229    *  4,229    15,041    19,270     4,229    **  4,229    19,128    23,357

James J. O’Connor

   7,000    *  7,000    55,484    62,484 

John J. Roberts

   2,612    *  2,612    24,263    26,875 

Gregory P. Spivy(6)

   2,612    *  2,612    5,737    8,349 

John J. Roberts(4)

    23,497    **  23,497    —      23,497

Ellen R. Romano

    15,680    —    15,680    11,254    26,934

Wayne R. Shurts

    1,064    **  1,064    1,465    2,529

Roy W. Templin

   4,816    *  4,816    2,298    7,114     9,736    **  9,736    1,465    11,201

Cherryl T. Thomas

   —      *  —      5,592    5,592     —      **  —      9,679    9,679

Directors and Executive Officers as a group (16 persons)(5)

   118,439    281,041   399,480    610,291    1,009,771 

Directors and Executive Officers as a group (15 persons)(5)

    464,040    86,444  550,484    323,039   ��873,523

 

(1)

Directors do not receive stock option grants under the 2008 Directors Stock Unit Plan, the 2016 Directors Stock Unit Plan or as part of the compensation program for directors.

(2)

No individual director or executive officer beneficially owns 1% of the shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 31, 2018.2021. The directors and executive officers as a group beneficially own approximately 1.7%1.8% of the shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 31, 2018.2021.

(3)

Represents, in the case of NEOs, unvested time-based restricted stock units (“NEO RSUs”) granted to them under the 2006, 2011 and 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as applicable, and, in the case of nonemployee directors, vested and unvested stock units (Director RSUs) granted to them as part of their annual retainer for Board service that are not acquirable by the director within 60 days of March 31, 20182021 under the terms of the 2008 Directors Stock Unit Plan and the 2016 Directors Stock Unit Plan. See Directors Aggregate Ownership table below for further information. Neither the unvested NEO RSUs nor the Director RSUs have voting power.

(4)Under

Elected not to stand for re-election at the Nomination Agreement with ValueAct Capital, Mr. Spivy2020 Annual Meeting. Information provided is deemed to hold the Director RSUs for the benefit of ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P. and indirectly for (i) VA Partners I, LLC as General Partner of ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P., (ii) ValueAct Capital Management, L.P. as the manager of ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P., (iii) ValueAct Capital Management, LLC as General Partner of ValueAct Capital Management, L.P., (iv) ValueAct Holdings, L.P. as the sole owner of the limited partnership interests of ValueAct Capital Management, L.P. and the membership interests of ValueAct Capital Management, LLC and as the majority owner of the membership interests of VA Partners I, LLC and (v) ValueAct Holdings GP, LLC as General Partner of ValueAct Holdings, L.P.2020 Annual Meeting.

(5)

Includes amounts for Ellen R. Romano, SVP, Human Resources and Stephen F. McNamara, VP, Controller.

 

 

 AWI 20182021 Proxy Statement          1927


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS, MANAGEMENT AND DIRECTORS(CONTINUED)

 

Directors – Aggregate Ownership

The table below sets forth, as of March 31, 2018,2021, additional detail as to each nonemployee director’s ownership and rights to ownership in the Company’s equity.

 

Name  Common
Shares
   Vested
Restricted
Stock  Units(1)
   Unvested
Restricted
Stock
Units(2)
   Phantom
Stock
Units(3)
   Total
Equity
   

Total

Value(4)

 
market  

Common

Shares

   

Vested

Restricted

Stock Units(1)

   

Unvested

Restricted

Stock

Units(2)

   

Phantom

Stock

Units(3)

   

Total

Equity(4)

   

Total

Value(5)

 

Stan A. Askren

   2,612    28,818    2,298    —      33,728   $1,898,886    7,532    28,818    1,465    —      37,815   $3,406,753 

Tao Huang

   —      23,799    2,298    —      26,097   $1,469,261    —      28,719    1,465    —      30,184   $2,719,277 

Barbara L. Loughran

   —      1,064    1,465    —      2,529   $227,838 

Larry S. McWilliams

   —      23,799    2,298    —      26,097   $1,469,261    —      29,718    2,023    —      31,741   $2,859,547 

James C. Melville

   4,229    12,743    2,298    —      19,270   $1,084,901    4,229    17,663    1,465    —      23,357   $2,104,232 

James J. O’Connor

   7,000    51,435    4,049    —      62,484   $3,517,849 

John J. Roberts

   2,612    21,965    2,298    11,773    26,875   $2,175,882(5) 

Gregory P. Spivy(6)

   2,612    3,439    2,298    —      8,349   $470,049 

John J. Roberts(6)

   23,497    —      —      11,773    23,497   $3,177,474(7) 

Wayne R. Shurts

   1,064    —      1,465    —      2,529   $227,838 

Roy W. Templin

   4,816    —      2,298    —      7,114   $400,518    9,736    —      1,465    —      11,201   $1,009,098 

Cherryl T. Thomas

   —      3,294    2,298    —      5,592   $314,830    —      8,214    1,465    —      9,679   $871,981 

Total

   23,881    169,292    22,433    11,773    215,606   $12,801,438    46,058    114,196    12,278    11,773    172,532   $16,604,037 

(1)

Under the terms of the 2008 Directors Stock Unit Plan, the Director RSUs granted to each director as part of his or her retainer for Board service are not acquirable by the director until (i) for those Director RSUs granted prior to June 2011, the earlier of thesix-month anniversary of the director’s separation from the Board for any reason other than a removal for cause or the date of a Change in Control Event (as defined in the 2008 Directors Stock Unit Plan); or (ii) for those Director RSUs granted during and after June 2011, on the date of the director’s separation from the Board for any reason other than a removal for cause or the date of a Change in Control Event (as defined in the 2008 Directors Stock Unit Plan). Under the terms of the 2016 Directors Stock Unit Plan, the Director RSUs granted to each director as part of his or her retainer for Board Service shall vest (contingent upon the Director’s continued service as of such date) on the earlier of (i) theone-year anniversary of the grant; (ii) the death or total and permanent disability of the Director; or (iii) the date of any Change in Control Event (as defined in the Plan).

(2)

Under the terms of the 2008 Directors Stock Unit Plan, Director RSUs vest on the first anniversary of the grant date. Under the terms of the 2016 Directors Stock Unit Plan, the vested units will be acquirable by the Director, at the election of the Director: (i) at the vesting of the units at theone-year anniversary of the grant or (ii) at the time of the Director’s termination of service. All of the director RSUs listed in this column will vest on July 13, 2018.June 25, 2021. Amount excludes $908.30 in accrued dividends (non-interest bearing) for all directors except for the Chairman. Amount excludes $1,254.26 in accrued dividends (non-interest bearing) for the Chairman.

(3)

Phantom Stock Units awarded under the Company’s 2006 Phantom Stock Unit Plan (“Phantom Stock Unit Plan”) become payable (“Phantom Units Payment Date”) in cash on the earlier of thesix-month anniversary of the director’s separation from the Board for any reason other than a removal for cause or the date of a Change in Control Event (as defined in the Phantom Stock Unit Plan). The cash payment amount will be equal to the number of units multiplied by the closing price of the shares of Common Stock on the stock exchange on which such shares are traded on the Phantom Units Payment Date.

(4)

Excludes Phantom Stock Units

(5)

Represents an amount equal to the sum of the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned, plus the number of vested and unvested Director RSUs, plus the number of Phantom Stock Units held, as applicable, multiplied by $56.30,$90.09, which was the closing price of the shares of Common Stock of the Company on the NYSE on March 29, 2018.

(5)Amount excludes $276,151.32 in accrued dividends(non-interest bearing).31, 2021.

(6)Under

Elected not to stand for re-election at the Nomination Agreement with ValueAct Capital, Mr. Spivy2020 Annual Meeting. Information provided is deemed to hold the Director RSUs for the benefit of ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P. and indirectly for (i) VA Partners I, LLC as General Partner of ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P., (ii) ValueAct Capital Management, L.P. as the manager of ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P., (iii) ValueAct Capital Management, LLC as General Partner of ValueAct Capital Management, L.P., (iv) ValueAct Holdings, L.P. as the sole owner of the limited partnership interests of ValueAct Capital Management, L.P. and the membership interests of ValueAct Capital Management, LLC and as the majority owner of the membership interests of VA Partners I, LLC and (v) ValueAct Holdings GP, LLC as General Partner of ValueAct Holdings, L.P.2020 Annual Meeting.

(7)

Amount excludes $296,283.21 in accrued dividends (non-interest bearing).

 

28    AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS, MANAGEMENT AND DIRECTORS (CONTINUED)

Stock Ownership Guidelines

In accordance with our Corporate Governance Principles, eachnon-employee nonemployee director must acquire and then hold until six months following the

end of his or her service, phantom units and/or shares of Common Stock equal in value to three times the director’s annual retainer at the time he or she joined the Board. Directors endeavor to reach that

level of ownership within five years of joining

20    AWI 2018 Proxy Statement


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS, MANAGEMENT AND DIRECTORS(CONTINUED)

the Board. With the exception of Mr. Spivy, Mr. Templin, and Ms. Thomas, allAll of the current directors who have served on the Board for at least five years have achieved this ownership requirement. For further details in stock ownership by nonemployee directors, see pages 27 and 28 of this proxy statement. As an officer of the Company, Mr. Grizzle is not subject to the stock ownership

guidelines for nonemployee directors. Mr. Spivy, Ms. Thomas and Mr. Templin first became eligible to participate in the nonemployee director compensation program in December 2014, April 2016 and September 2016, respectively.

 

 

 

 AWI 20182021 Proxy Statement          2129


ITEM 2 – RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

The Audit Committee selected KPMG LLP to audit our consolidated financial statements and our internal control over financial reporting for 2018.2021. In accordance with past practice, this selection will be presented to the shareholders for ratification at the Annual Meeting; however, consistent with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Audit Committee has ultimate authority in respect of the selection of our independent

registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee may reconsider its selection if the appointment is not ratified by the shareholders.

A representative of KPMG LLP will be in attendance at the Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions and will be afforded the opportunity to make a statement at the meeting, if he or she desires to do so.

 

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTEFOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP.

 

 
2230          AWI 20182021 Proxy Statement 


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee engaged KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2018.2021. In making this selection, the Audit Committee considered KPMG LLP’s qualifications, discussed with KPMG LLP its independence, and reviewed the audit andnon-audit services provided by KPMG LLP to the Company.

Management of the Company has primary responsibility for preparing the Company’s financial statements and establishing effective internal control over financial reporting. KPMG LLP is responsible for auditing those financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria established in 2013 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Accordingly, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements for fiscal 20172020 with the Company’s management. The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management the critical accounting policies applied by the Company in the preparation of those financial statements. The Audit Committee also discussed with KPMG LLP the matters required to be discussed by applicable standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, and had the opportunity to ask KPMG LLP questions relating to such matters. The discussions included the quality, and not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles utilized, the reasonableness of significant accounting judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.

The Audit Committee regularly considers the independence, qualifications and performance of KPMG LLP. Such consideration includes reviewing the written disclosures and the letter received from KPMG LLP required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accountants’ communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussing with KPMG LLP their independence.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020. The Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of KPMG LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders and have recommended that shareholders ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year 2018.2021.

Submitted by the Audit Committee

John J. Roberts (Chair)

Tao Huang

Larry S. McWilliams

Roy W. Templin

Cherryl T. Thomas

Submitted by the Audit Committee

Roy W. Templin (Chair)

Stan A. Askren

Barbara L. Loughran

Wayne R. Shurts

LOGO

 

 

 AWI 20182021 Proxy Statement          2331


FEES PAID TO INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The following table presents fees for professional audit services rendered by KPMG LLP for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements for 20172020 and 2016,2019, as well as fees billed for other services rendered by KPMG LLP. All fees in 20172020 and 20162019 werepre-approved by the Audit Committee.

 

(amounts in thousands)      2017           2016           2020           2019     

Audit Fees(1)

  $3,444   $2,625    $3,539    $3,190 

Audit Related Fees(2)

   1,823    91    70    103 

Audit and Audit Related Fees Subtotal

   5,267    2,716    3,609    3,293 

Tax Fees(3)

   983    1,833    217    662 

All Other Fees

   —      —   

All Other Fees(4)

   11    —   

Total Fees

  $6,250   $4,549    $3,837    $3,955 

 

(1)Audit Fees

For both years audit fees are for services rendered in connection with the integrated audit of Armstrong’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the year then ended, for which a portion of the billings occurred in the following year. Audityears. For both years, audit fees were also incurred for reviews of consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form10-Q and regulatory filings, and for 2019, services normally provided in connection with statutory filings. In addition, audit fees for 2020 include audit fees in connection with Armstrong’s Form 10-K/A filing and regulatory filings. Audit Fees in 2017 also include fees associated with the impactreissuance and dual dating of U.S. tax reform, resegmentation of the business,KPMG’s 2019 auditor’s report and the adoptionpreparation of FASB ASC 606.a written consent for a Registration Statement on Form S-8 related to the Armstrong World Industries, Inc. Inducement Award Plan.

 

(2)Audit-Related Fees

For both years audit-related fees consisted principallyprimarily of fees for audits of financial statements of certain employee benefit plans, accounting research assistance on technical topics andplans. Fees for other matters with respect tonon-U.S. statutory financial statements. Audit-Related Fees in 2017 also include fees associated with sell-side due diligence activities in connection with the sale of the Company’s International Business.statements are included for 2019 only.

 

(3)

Tax Feesfees were primarily for preparation of tax returns innon-U.S. jurisdictions,compliance, tax planning, advice on divestitures, technical assistance with tax audits and appealsconsulting on both domestic and other tax consultation and compliance services.international matters.

(4)

Fees that do not fall within the categories set forth above. Fees in 2020 are for participation in executive education programs.

The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision by KPMG LLP of thenon-audit services described above was allowed under Rule2-01(c)(4) of RegulationS-X and was compatible with maintaining auditor independence, and has concluded that KPMG LLP was and is independent of the Company in all respects.

Audit CommitteePre-Approval Policy

The Audit Committee adheres to a policy that requires the Audit Committee’s prior approval of any audit, audit-related andnon-audit services provided by the firm that serves as our independent registered public accounting firm. Pursuant to this policy, management cannot engage the firm for any services without the Audit Committee’spre-approval. The Audit Committee delegates to the Audit Committee Chair the authority topre-approvenon-auditpre-approve non-audit services for purposes of handling immediate needs, with a report to the full Audit Committee of such approvals at its next meeting. The policy complies with Section 10A(i) of the Exchange Act.

Auditor Tenure

Through more than 90 years of experience with Armstrong, KPMG LLP has gained institutional knowledge of and deep expertise regarding Armstrong’s global operations and businesses, accounting policies and practices, and internal control over financial reporting. We believe KPMG LLP’s aggregate fees are competitive with peer companies.their peers because of KPMG LLP’s familiarity with our business.

 

 
2432          AWI 20182021 Proxy Statement 


ITEM 3 – ADVISORY APPROVAL OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The Company is seeking your advisory vote on our executive compensation program. The Company asks that you support the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and the accompanying tables contained in this Proxy Statement.proxy statement. Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding on the Board or the Company. However, the Board will review the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding executive compensation.

The Company has in the past sought approval from shareholders regarding the incentive plans that we use to motivate, retain, and reward our executives. Those incentive plans, including the 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan, make up a majority of the pay that the Company provides to our executives. Over the years, the Company has made a number of changes to its disclosures concerning executive compensation, as well as to its executive compensation programs, in response to shareholder input, including a number of enhancements mentioned in this proxy statement.

Our executive compensation program has played a material role in our ability to drive strong financial results and attract and retain a highly experienced, successful team to manage our company.

We believe that our executive compensation program which was modified by our Compensation Committee in connection with the separation, is structured appropriately to support our company and our business objectives, particularly our post-separation structure and strategies.objectives.

Our Compensation Committee has developed and maintained a compensation program that is intended to: align executive interests with shareholders’ interest; link pay and performance by placing a significant portion of compensation “at risk” based on performance againstpre-established goals; and provideprovided a competitive level of compensation globally to enable access to high-quality executives in a competitive way.

As reflected in the total shareholder return components of our new program, if the value we deliver to our shareholders increases, so does the compensation we deliver to our executives.

We maintain strong corporate governance over our executive pay programs. We closely monitor the compensation programs and pay levels of executives from companies of similar size and complexity, so that we may ensure that our compensation programs are within the norm of a range of market practices.practices

Our Compensation Committee, our Chief Executive Officer, and our head of Human Resources engage in a rigorous talent review process annually to address succession and executive development for our CEO and other key executives.

 

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTEFOR THE COMPANY’S COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DISCLOSED IN THE COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS SECTION AND THE ACCOMPANYING COMPENSATION TABLES CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.STATEMENT

 

 

 AWI 20182021 Proxy Statement          2533


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

In this compensation discussion and analysis (“CD&A”) section, we review the objectives and elements of our executive compensation philosophy, as well as the alignment of our program with the Company’s performance and compensation decisions in 20172020 relating to our named executive officers (“NEOs”) who are:

Victor D. Grizzle President and CEO

Brian L. MacNeal Senior Vice President and CFO

Charles M. Chiappone Senior Vice President, Ceiling & Wall Solutions

Mark A. Hershey Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Business Development

Ellen R. Romano Senior Vice President, Human Resources

OUR COVID-19 RESPONSE

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we followed and continue to follow guidelines from health authorities throughout all of our facilities. We implemented and continue to maintain preventative measures that include working remotely, providing personal protective equipment (including masks), limiting group meetings, enhancing cleaning and sanitizing procedures, and social distancing. We developed and continue to execute contact tracing procedures when a COVID case occurs in our workplace. Employees who can meet the requirements of their role and our customer commitments by working remotely are doing so. A significant portion of our workforce began teleworking in mid-March 2020 and currently continue to telework. Early in the pandemic, we implemented an Emergency Paid Leave policy that granted additional paid time off for any employee who needed to miss work due to COVID-19-related reasons during 2020. We updated the leave policy to include pay for time required for vaccination in 2021. Through these measures and the dedicated efforts of our employees, particularly our production employees in our manufacturing facilities, we prevented service disruption and maintained high customer service levels, while keeping our employees safe and employed.

Our Board and Compensation Committee took several actions relative to compensation plans in response to the pandemic.

Our Compensation Committee effected a voluntary base salary reduction of 10% for the CEO and 5% for other NEOs, effective June 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020. Salaries were restored on January 1, 2021.

Our Board approved a revised annual operating plan in July 2020 in recognition of challenging market conditions due to COVID-19. Our Compensation Committee then revised the Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) design for the broad-based employee population, moving to a single metric of EBITDA at a target of $320 million. The modified AIP measuring EBITDA only was designed to provide eligible employees with an incentive opportunity for achieving results based on performance goals under the adjusted operating budget. Details on the redesigned AIP for broad-based employees found on page 44 of this proxy statement. Payout under the redesigned AIP for 2020 for the broad-based employee population under the revised plan was 64%. No change was made to the Annual Incentive Plan design for the CEO and other NEOs.

At year end, our Compensation Committee and Board considered financial performance, as well the Company’s operational performance, along with efforts to effectively lead through the pandemic, protect employees and ensure the Company’s strategic initiatives were accomplished for the year in order to position the Company for continued success in the future. Based on these and other factors, our Committee and Board exercised discretion and approved a payout of 56% for CEO and NEOs. Details on payments found on page 45 of this proxy statement.

Our Board effected a 10% reduction to non-employee director compensation, specifically to the annual cash retainer and committee chair fees for non-employee directors, effective June 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020. These reductions to non-employee director compensation were restored on January 1, 2021.

34    AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Business Overview

 

We are a global leaderleading producer of ceiling and wall systems for use in the design, innovationconstruction and manufacturerenovation of commercial and residential ceiling, wall and suspension system solutions.buildings. We design, manufacture and sell ceilingsceiling and wall systems, (primarilyprimarily systems composed of mineral fiber, fiberglass wool, metal, wood, wood fiber, glass-reinforced-gypsum and metal).felt in the Americas.

Our fiscal year 20172020 key performance highlights included:

 

 

Adjusted EBITDAEBITDA*:    Adjusted Earnings beforeBefore Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”)* of $317$330 million, a 18% decrease over 2019, driven by a significant decrease in net sales resulting from pandemic-related delays in construction and renovation activity within both segments during the second through fourth quarters of 2020. In response to challenging market conditions, we executed on a continuing operations basis, a 7.5% improvement over 2016. The core value drivers$40M of cost reduction initiatives, temporarily suspended our business enabled the improvement, namely increases in sales volumeshare repurchase program, reduced capital expenditures and average unit value (“AUV”) plus lower selling, generallowered discretionary spending including compensation, travel and administration (“SG&A”)marketing expenses.

 

 

Consolidated Net Sales:    Consolidated constant currency netNet sales increased 6.7%decreased by 10% over 2016. The increase was2019, driven by higher AUV,a significant decrease in construction and renovation activity within both segments during the second through fourth quarters of 2020 due to the pandemic. Specifically, we noted delays in construction and renovation activity resulting from government mandated shutdowns, with the most significant impacts in major metropolitan areas heavily impacted by COVID-19, many of which both mix and likerepresent key sales territories for like pricing were positive, and higher volume.

our business.

 

 

Adjusted Free Cash Flow (“FCF”)*:    $147$212 million of FCF, defined as cash flow from operations minus cash flow used infor investing activities, exceededa 13% decrease over 2019, driven by the high enddecrease in earnings.

Adjusted Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)*:    Adjusted EPS of our guidance range$3.63, a 24% decline over 2019, driven by the decrease in earnings.

Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”):    13.2% for the 2018-2020 performance period.

Business Development/ M&A:    In July, we acquired TURF Design, Inc. Turf is a leading designer and fabricator of $145 million,acoustic felt ceiling and

wall products based in Chicago, Illinois. In August, we acquired Moz Design, Inc., a 26% improvement over 2016.designer and fabricator of custom architectural metal ceilings, walls, dividers, and column covers based in Oakland, California. In December, we acquired Arktura LLC. Arktura is a leading designer and fabricator of specialty architectural solutions, including metal and felt ceilings, walls and partitions, based in Los Angeles, California.

 

 

Adjusted Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)Repurchases:    Adjusted EPSWe temporarily suspended our share repurchase program during the first quarter of $3.02, an improvement2020 in response to uncertainties surrounding COVID-19. We restarted the program in October 2020. During 2020, we repurchased 0.5 million shares of 23% over 2016.

our common stock for a total cost of $44.4 million.

 

 

InvestmentsDividends:    Concluded $100 million of capital investmentsWe continued our quarterly dividend program and paid dividends totaling $0.81 per share in manufacturing capabilities to enable production of Total Acoustics and Sustain product lines and our flexible design capabilities.

2020.

 

 

Business DevelopmentDigitalization::    Acquired In 2020, we continued to use digitalization to get closer to our customers, focusing on building solutions and integrated Tectum, Inc.experiences that are collaborative and self-serve. We expanded on our set of customer self-serve digital tools to enable accelerated quoting of our specialty products, seamless conversion of quotes to orders, and simplified order tracking. We introduced a new service, ProjectWorksTM, revolutionizing the way contractors estimate ceiling system costs. We also designed and launched an Ohio-based manufacturerentirely new e-commerce platform, KanopiTM, to access and service renovation needs across a broad category of acoustical wall systemsend users. The new kanopi site drives demand, and roof decks.

provides support on product selection, ordering and installation services, www.kanopibyarmstrongceilings.com.

 

 

Share RepurchaseProduct launches:     We repurchased 1.8 million shareslaunched 35 new products in 2020, exceeding our previous five-year average launch rate of 24 per year. As part of our Common StockHealthy Spaces initiative in 2017 underresponse to COVID-19, we launched our ongoing share-repurchase program“24/7 Defend” portfolio to address the need for a total cost of $80.4 million, or an average price of $43.58 per share.

healthier, safer spaces and improved indoor air quality.

 

Cost Reduction:    We took actions to optimize our North America manufacturing footprint and overall cost structure, including the November 2017 announced closure of our St. Helens, OR manufacturing plant in order to further enhance service to our West Coast customers through a new distribution center. We also announced plans to restructure our general and administration profile to serve an Americas-focused business.

 

 

International Business Divesture:    On November 20, 2017, we announced the sale of our businesses and operations in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (including Russia) and the Pacific Rim (the “International Business”), including the corresponding businesses and operations conducted by Worthington Armstrong Venture, in which we hold a fifty percent (50%) interest, to Knauf International GmbH (“Knauf”).AWI 2021 Proxy Statement

    35


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)

Please also see our Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report onForm 10-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2018.23, 2021.

 

*

The Company uses these Continuing operations basis, excludesnon-cashnon-GAAP pension expense.adjusted measures in managing the business and believes the adjustments provide meaningful comparisons of operating performance between periods. Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EPS exclude certain acquisition related expenses (i.e. changes in the fair value of earnouts, deferred compensation accruals, impact of adjustments related to the fair value of inventory and deferred revenue) for recent acquisitions. The deferred compensation accruals are for cash and stock awards that will be recorded over the vesting period, as such payments are subject to the sellers’ and employees’ continued employment with the Company. Examples of other excluded items include plant closures, restructuring charges and related costs, impairments, separation costs, environmental site expenses and related insurance recoveries, endowment level charitable contributions, and certain other gains and losses. The Company also excludes income/expense from its U.S. Retirement Income Plan (“RIP”) in the non-GAAP results as it represents the actuarial net periodic benefit credit/cost recorded. For all periods presented, the Company was not required and did not make cash contributions to the RIP based on guidelines established by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, nor does the Company expect to make cash contributions to the plan in 2021. Adjusted FCF is defined as cash from operating and investing activities, adjusted to remove the impact of cash used or proceeds received for acquisitions and divestitures, legacy environmental matters and litigation, and the cash impact of certain other non-recurring extraordinary items outside of the normal course of our business operations. Please refer to Annex A for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDAthese non-GAAP financial measures to our results as reported under accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. GAAP.(“GAAP”).

20182021 Priorities

Fiscal year 20182021 key priorities include:

 

 

Profitable Revenue Growth:    Driving revenue growth in our mineral fiber and architectural specialties segments by leveraging our existing capabilities, through the acquisition of new capabilities, and by focusing on a broader ceilings and wall market opportunity.

opportunities

 

Adjusted EBITDA:    Achieving EBITDA growth through sales gains, Architectural Specialties (“AS”) volume contribution, manufacturing productivity, and restructuring savings announced in 2017.

increased contributions from WAVE.

 

 

Capabilities:    Enhancing our manufacturing, commercial and commercialdigital capabilities and expanding our commercial sales resourcescapacity to align with broader market opportunities.

opportunities, through ongoing digitalization and other efficiency initiatives.

 

 

InternationalOperational Efficiency:    CompletingContinuing to pursue productivity, efficiency and working capital improvements in our manufacturing operations.

Capital Allocation:    Allocating capital to high return opportunities, continuing to invest in innovation and productivity initiatives, as well as value-creating acquisitions and business opportunities, and returning excess capital to our shareholders.

Investments in Digitalization:    Enabling customer productivity with digital optimization tools and solutions, including expanded connectivity and self-service options. Rapidly expanding our kanopi e-commerce platform with new tools and features to drive demand, support the salecustomer buying journey and extend installation offerings.

Healthy Spaces:    Designing and launching safe and healthy solutions to make a difference in the places where people live, work, learn, heal and play.

Business Development / M&A:    Continuing to expand into adjacencies in our Architectural Specialties segment, and focusing on acquisition and partnership opportunities to enhance our offerings and capabilities in key product categories, including Healthy Spaces, and related design applications.

Sustainability: Continuing the design implementation and communication of a comprehensive sustainability program to address the interests of our International Businesskey stakeholders, namely our shareholders, employees, customers and communities, and enable our growth strategies. Our Sustainability Ambition is to Knauf.

lead a transformation in the design and building of spaces fit for today and for tomorrow.

2020 Compensation Plan Design

Our Compensation Committee regularly reviews our compensation plans and, in anticipation of 2020, determined to generally continue and maintain the

 

 

 
2636          AWI 20182021 Proxy Statement 


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS(CONTINUED)

 

Operational Efficiency:    Continuing to pursue productivity, efficiency and working capital improvements in our manufacturing operations.

Capital Allocation:    Allocating capital to high return opportunities while optimizing FCF.

Cost Optimization:    Aligning SG&A structure and cost to an Americas-focused company.

2017 Compensation Highlights

During 2017, we redesigned our annual incentive plan as discussed below, and otherwise continued the executive compensation programsdesign established in 2016. As in prior years, ouryears. Our plans are designed to directly link compensation to meaningful improvementachievements in Company performance.

Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”):Plan: Our Compensation Committee redesigned this plan for 20172020 AIP continued to place specific emphasis onutilize revenue and EBITDA as the performance metrics for global and regional Company results. These measures align to key elements of our operating plan and financial goals, including enhanced revenue growth, manufacturing productivity and competitive SG&A expense, and are strong indicators of our overall operating performance. In July 2020, our Compensation Committee approved a redesign of our AIP for broad-based employees measuring EBITDA as the sole metric. Our NEOs were excluded from eligibility under the redesigned AIP.    

Long-Term Incentive Program (“LTIP”): Our 2020 LTIP executive grants for 2017 werecontinued to be comprised of performance-based restricted stock units (“PSU”), with performance metrics based on absolute total shareholder return (“Absolute TSR”) and cumulative FCF. We did not grant time based restricted stock units to our executive officers in 2017.FCF, as well as Mineral Fiber Volume (“MFV”), a new metric for 2020.    Our Compensation Committee selected Absolute TSR as a metric in our LTIP because it believes Absolute TSR most directly captures shareholder value creation, while providing senior management with the flexibility and levers needed to drive meaningful performance change.improvement. Our Compensation Committee selected FCF as a performance metric in the LTIP because it believes FCF growth is ana strong indicator of value creatingvalue-creating activities over the performance period. Our Compensation Committee added MFV as a performance metric in the LTIP because of the strategic importance of volume growth in our mineral fiber business. The 2020 grants, intended to compensate for long term value creation, have a three-year performance period, to allow a reasonable timeframe for value creation, challenging targets with substantialmeaningful payout upside for breakout performance, and a payout scale that includes meaningfulsignificant performance hurdles. These plan features, and others as described in more detail in the body of this Compensation Discussion and AnalysisCD&A, are all designed to strongly align the interests of management andwith those of shareholders, and to provide strong incentives for performance and growth consistent with our strategic plan.

Named Executive Officers

The Company’s named We did not grant time-based restricted stock units to our executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 were:

Victor D. Grizzle President and CEO

Brian L. MacNeal Senior Vice President and CFO

Charles Chiappone Senior Vice President, Ceiling Solutions(1)

David S. Cookson Senior Vice President, Americas

Mark A. Hershey Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer

in 2020.

(1)In connection with the retirement of Mr. Cookson as of July 1, 2018, Mr. Chiappone was appointed as Senior Vice President, Ceiling and Wall Solutions, effective April 1, 2018

Shareholder Engagement

In 2017,2020, we again engagedcontinued to engage with our shareholders to learn aboutseek their perspectives on corporate governance, our executive compensation program, sustainability and other matters. We engaged inconducted formal outreach dialogues over the course of the year with shareholders representing approximately 27%39% of our outstanding shares outstanding at the time of outreach. The

outreachThese discussions were conducted by Mr.Mark Hershey, our Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Business Development, and Ellen R. Romano, our Senior Vice President, Human Resources. A detailed summaryResources, and complemented our regular quarterly informal outreach initiatives led by our Investor Relations team. Detailed summaries of thethese discussions waswere shared with the Compensation Committee and our Nominating, Governance Committee. Overall, theand Social Responsibility Committee, which considers and incorporates shareholder feedback in our governance processes. Our outreach discussions were productive andin 2020 focused primarily on PSU metricsour sustainability initiatives, our actions in response to COVID-19, and Board succession planning. Our 2017our LTIP performance metrics. We believe that our 2020 nonbinding shareholder advisory vote on our executive

AWI 2018 Proxy Statement    27


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS(CONTINUED)

compensation program resultapproval vote of 93% approval96% reflects strong shareholder support for the design and outcomes of our executive compensation program design.program. Shareholder communications and inquiries are shared with Company management and with the Chairs of the Board and its Committees, as appropriate. In 2020, in response to certain communications or inquiries, members of Company management and our Board engaged in discussions with shareholders to discuss topics relating to corporate governance and executive compensation.

Our Executive Compensation Philosophy, Objectives, Elements and Characteristics

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our long-term success and growth depend on highly capable leaders with appropriate experience and skills to deliver our strategy in a volatile and challenging market environment. Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, motivate and retain those high-quality leaders. In

developing and maintaining our executive compensationthis program, theour Compensation Committee focuses on the following key objectives:

 

Aligning executive interests with shareholder interests.

AWI 2021 Proxy Statement    37


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)

 

Creating a strong link between pay and performance by placing a significant portion of compensation ‘‘at risk’’ based on performance againstpre-established goals.

Structuring sufficiently competitive compensation packages to enable access to high-quality executives in a highly competitive talent environment.

 

28    AWI 2018 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS(CONTINUED)

 

Compensation Elements

In 2017,2020, we executed our compensation philosophy by providing compensation opportunities through a combination of: (a) fixed compensation, including (i) base salaries, (ii) benefits and (iii) limitedselect perquisites; and (b) performance-based compensation, including (i) cash incentive awards under our annual incentive plan,Annual Incentive Plan, and (ii) grants of PSUPSUs under our 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan our(our omnibus equity award plan.plan).

 

Type 

Compensation

Elements

 Form and Objective Further Information Key 20172020 NEO Actions

FixedLOGO

 Base Salary 

•  Delivered in cash

 

•  Provides reasonable, market competitive fixed pay delivered to each NEO, and reflects his or her role, responsibility, individual performance and contribution to the Company

 

•  Generally set at market median

 

  2020 Base Salary changes for our NEOs are presented on page 3443

 

•  NEOs received merit increases averaging 4.7%, effective April 1, 20172020. In response to the impact of COVID-19 pandemic, the Compensation Committee approved a 10% reduction in base salary for Mr. Grizzle and 5% reduction in base salary for all other NEOs, effective June 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020.

 Benefits 

•  Standard range of health, welfare, and retirement benefits generally similar to those provided to other salaried employees, except that executives:

 

•  are eligible to receive enhanced Company-paid long-term disability benefits; and

 

•  are eligible fornon-qualified retirement benefits

    
 LimitedSelect Perquisites 

•   Very limited perquisites or personal benefits

•  Personal financial counseling at a cost generally less than $4,500 per NEO

 

•  Executive physicals at a cost generally less than $5,000 per NEO

 

•  Executive long-term disability at a cost generally less than $5,000 per NEO

 

    

Performance-BasedLOGO

 Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”)(AIP) 

•  Delivered in cash

 

•  Provides an annual incentive opportunity for achieving financial results based on performance goals tied to our annual operating plan

 

•  Drives selected target metric performance

 

•  AwardsPayouts are tied to Company region and individual performance, including leadership behaviors

 

•  Target opportunity generally set at market median

 

 

•  AIP was based on revenue and EBITDA global Company results and regional results (as described on page 34)44)

 

•  NEOs receivedThreshold was not met under the AIP payments for 2017our NEOs. Our Compensation Committee exercised discretion and approved performance ranging from 74% to 84%at 56% of targettarget.

 Long-Term Incentive Program (“LTIP”)(LTIP) 

•  Delivered in 100% PSUs for 2020

 

•  Drives and promotes long- termlong-term value-creation for our shareholders, and fosters retention, by rewarding execution and achievement of goals linked to our longer term strategic initiatives and stock performance

 

•  Target opportunity generally set at market median

 

•  In 2017,2020, our Compensation Committee awarded3-year PSUs tied to Absolute TSR FCF, and FCFMFV

 

•  LTILTIP performance goals were based on FCF, MFV and Absolute TSR (as described on page 35)46)

 

•  NEOs received annualwere granted PSU awards in 2020 with target values ranging from 75%100% to 317%411% of base.base salary.

 

AWI 2018 Proxy Statement38          29AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS(CONTINUED)

 

Compensation Characteristics

At the direction of our Compensation Committee, we subscribe to a“pay-for-performance” philosophy. Our compensation program maintains the following attributes:

 

 

Compensation at Risk – A significant amount of each NEO’s target total direct compensation (“TDC”), composed of base salary and short-termshort- and long-term incentive compensation, depends on the Company and the NEO achieving specific, performance-based results. Our NEOs’ short- and long-term incentive compensation is, dependent upon achieving specific results. This compensation is, therefore, “at risk” withas the value of one or more elements of compensationis tied to the achievement of financial and/or other measures that the Company considers to be important drivers of shareholder value.

 

 

Multiple and Appropriate Performance Metrics – We use multiple performance measures to avoid having compensation opportunities overly weighted toward the performance resultsresult of a single metric. In 2017,2020, we used FCF, and Absolute TSR in our LTIPand MFV as performance metrics for our LTIP grants for the 2020-2022 performance period in order to maintain a focus on longer-term metricsresults that help drive shareholder value. We used revenue and EBITDA as ourperformance metrics in our AIP. These measures align to key elements of our operating plan and financial goals, including: enhancedincluding revenue growth, manufacturing productivity and competitive sales and general and administrative expense andlevels. Each of these measures is a strong indicator of our overall operating performance.

 

 

Emphasis on Long-Term Incentive and Annual Incentive CompensationLong-termShort- and long-term incentive compensation and annual incentive compensation for our NEOs make upcomprises a largesignificant percentage of their TDC. Incentive compensation helps drive performance and aligns the interests of employees (including the NEOs) with those of shareholders. By tying a significant portion of TDC to long-term incentives over a three-year period, we promote longer-term perspectives regarding Company performance.

Recoupment – We may recoup certain stock-based and cash awards distributed under our 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan and Annual Incentive Plan, including to our NEOs, in the

event of an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws; or certain misconduct causing significant financial or reputational harm to the Company.

 

 

Recoupment Policy – We have the ability to recoup certain stock-based awards in the event of termination of employment for willful, deliberate or gross misconduct or in the event a participant engages in injurious conduct after termination of

employment. To the extent the SEC adopts future rules for clawback policies that require changes to our plans or policies, we will revise them, as appropriate.

Prohibition on Derivative Transactions – Our insider trading policy prohibits derivative transactions in our shares of Common Stock, including:including trading in puts, calls, covered calls, or other derivative products involving our securities; prohibits engaging in any hedging transaction with respect to our securities; and prohibits holding company securities in a margin account or pledging our securities as collateral for a loan.

 

 

Stock Ownership Guidelines – Our NEOs are subject to stock ownership guidelines, which help to promote longer-term perspectives and align interests with those of our long-term shareholders. The required ownership multiple is six times annual base pay for our CEO, and three times annual base pay for all other NEOs.

As of December 2020, all of our NEOs had met their ownership requirements.

 

 

Linear and Capped Incentive Compensation PayoutsTheOur Compensation Committee establishes financial performance goals that are used to plot a linear payout formula for annual and long-term incentive compensation to avoid an over-emphasis on short- termshort-term decision making. The maximum payout for the annualAnnual incentive compensation isplan payouts are capped at 200% of target.target and Long-term incentive compensation isPSUs are capped at 275%270% of target for Messrs. Grizzle, MacNeal, Chiappone and Cookson and 225% of target for Mr. Hershey.

target.

 

 

Change in Control Double Trigger(“CIC”) Double-Trigger – Our CIC agreements include double triggerdouble-trigger vesting provisions for equity grants upon a change in control.

 

 

Lack ofNo TaxGross-Ups – We do not have plans or agreements that provide taxgross-ups to our NEOs under Section 280G or 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code.

 

 

Holding Requirements – Post-vesting holding requirements apply for amounts payable above target in our 2016under the 2018, 2019 and 20172020 performance-based equity grants forawarded to Messrs. Grizzle, MacNeal Chiappone and Cookson.

Chiappone. If earned, the shares earned above target must be held for one year following the vesting date.
 

 

30AWI 2021 Proxy Statement          AWI 2018 Proxy Statement39


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS(CONTINUED)

 

The following table illustrates how our executive compensation elements align with our compensation objectives.

 

Executive Compensation Element  

Attract

Talented

Employees

   

Align

Management

and

Shareholder

Interests

   

Pay for

Performance

   

Motivate and

Retain

Management

 

Base Salary

Base Salary

Annual Incentive Plan (AIP)

     

Long-Term Incentive Program (LTIP)

     

HOW WE MAKE COMPENSATION DECISIONS

Our Compensation Committee is responsible for executive compensation program design and the decision-making process relative to NEOs specifically, and broadly, as these programs apply to other senior leaders and participating employees.

The Compensation Committee solicits input from

the independent members of the Board, theour CEO, other members of management and its independent compensation consultant to assist with its responsibilities. The following summarizes the roles of each of the key participants in the executive compensation decision-making process.

 

Roles of Key Participants

 

Compensation Committee

  

•  Sets the philosophy and principles that guide the executive compensation program;

 

•  Oversees the design of our executive compensation program in the context of our culture, competitive practices, the legal and regulatory landscape, and governance trends;

 

•  Reviews and approves short- and long-term incentive compensation design, including performance goals and the reward consequences for delivering above or below target performance;

 

•  Reviews and approves corporate goals and individual objectives relevant to the compensation of the CEO, evaluates the CEO’s performance relative to those goals and objectives, and recommends CEO compensation to be ratified by the independent directors based on the evaluation; and

 

•  Oversees the evaluation of the other executive officers and approves their compensation in collaboration with the CEO.

 

Independent Members of the Board  

•  Participate in the performance assessment process for the CEO; and

 

•  Review and approve decisions regarding CEO compensation, including base salary, AIP and LTIP awards for the CEO.

 

Committee Consultant – Willis Towers Watson  

•  Provides analysis, advice and recommendations with regard to executive compensation;

 

•  Attends Compensation Committee meetings, as requested, and communicates between meetings with the Compensation Committee Chair and other Committee members; and

 

•  Advises the Compensation Committee on market trends, regulatory issues and developments and how they may impact our executive compensation programs; andprograms.

 

CEO

  

•  Provides input to the Compensation Committee on senior executive performance and compensation recommendations.recommendations (except with respect to his own performance and compensation).

 

AWI 2018 Proxy Statement40          31AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS(CONTINUED)

 

Independent Compensation Consultant

In July 2017, the2020, our Compensation Committee renewed itsthe engagement of Willis Towers Watson as its independent consultant on executive compensation matters.

Willis Towers Watson also serves as our Pension Plan Actuary in Canada (an arrangement that has been in place for several years, prior to Willis Towers Watson becoming the Compensation Committee’s consultant). Typical actuary annual fees are $50,000.$40,000. We also purchase select compensation and HR survey data from the firm. Willis Towers Watson does not perform any other services for the Company. At the request of the Compensation Committee, in addition to providing general executive compensation advice, Willis Towers Watson performed the following services during 2017:relating to 2020 compensation decisions:

 

Advisedadvised on the design considerations with respect to the 2017 short-term2020 short- and long-term incentive programs to ensure appropriate linkage between short- and long-term performancesperformance and pay;

 

Advisedadvised the Compensation Committee on the composition of a revised peer group;

 

Advisedadvised the Compensation Committee on setting the CEO’s compensation; and

 

Providedprovided an update on current compensation trends, market practices and relevant executive compensation legislation.

The Compensation Committee determined the work of Willis Towers Watson did not raise any conflicts of interest in 2017.2020. In making this assessment, the Compensation Committee considered the independence factors enumerated in Rule10C-1(b) under the Exchange Act and corresponding rules of NYSE, including the fact that Willis Towers Watson providesprovided limited other services to us, the level of fees received from us as a percentage of Willis Towers Watson’s total revenue, policies and procedures employed by Willis Towers Watson to prevent conflicts of interest, and whether the individual Willis Towers Watson advisors to the Compensation Committee own any shares of Common Stock or have any business or personal relationships with members of the Compensation Committee or our executive officers.

After considering all of the factors required byprovided in the SEC and the NYSE rules and all other factors

relevant to Willis

Towers Watson’s independence, the Compensation Committee has determined Willis Towers Watson is independent.

Use of Competitive Data

In setting NEO compensation, the Compensation Committee considers independent survey data, peer compensation data, tally sheets, wealth accumulation analyses and related benchmark information.

Annual Compensation Benchmarking

Annually, the Compensation Committee reviews all components of NEO compensation compared to the Competitive Market data (defined below). data.

In general, we target NEO pay to be at or near the 50th percentile of theour defined Competitive Market, but we may deviate from this target based on an individual’s performance or internal equity with peers situated at similar levels, or to attract the required level of global business knowledge and leadership needed to achieve our strategic objectives.

The principal sources of market data include the following (“Competitive Market”):

 

Survey data (all NEOs), including surveys by AonHewittAon and Willis Towers Watson

Watson; and

 

Peer Group data (CEO and CFO) (“Peer Group”)

Consideration of 20172020 Advisory Shareholder Vote on Executive Compensation

At theour 2017 Annual Meeting,annual meeting, our shareholders expressed a preference that advisory votes on executive compensation occur every year. In accordance with this vote,Accordingly, the Board intends to implementimplemented an annual advisory vote on executive compensation every year until the next required vote on the frequency of shareholder votes on the compensation of executives. That vote is scheduled to occur at the 2023 annual meeting. Our most recent advisory shareholder vote on executive compensation took place at the 2017 Annual Meeting2020 annual meeting.

Our Board and Compensation Committee appreciate and value the views of our shareholders with respect to our executive compensation program. In considering theThe favorable (96%) results of the 2017 favorable (93%)2020 advisory vote on executive compensation, provided further support to the Compensation Committee that

 

 

32AWI 2021 Proxy Statement          AWI 2018 Proxy Statement41


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS(CONTINUED)

 

compensation, the Compensation Committee believes that our executive compensation programs have been effective in implementing our stated compensation philosophy and objectives in a manner consistent with shareholder preference.

The Compensation Committee recognizes executive pay practices and notions of sound governance principles continue to evolve. While no specific changes were implemented as a result of

the 2020 advisory vote, the Compensation Committee intends to continue to pay close attention to ongoingmonitor trends and invites our shareholders to communicate any concerns or opinions on executive pay directly to the Compensation Committee or the Board. Please refer to “COMMUNICATION WITH THE BOARD” on page 1013 for further information about communication with the Compensation Committee of the Board.

 

Peer Group

The Compensation Committee uses compensation data compiled from a group of peer companies based on a number ofpre-established criteria, including business model comparability, company size measured by both revenue (approximatelyone-half to two times the Company’s annual revenue) and market capitalization, globalgeographic presence and investorinvestment capital.

During 2016,In 2020, our Compensation Committee conducted anin-depth review ofagain reviewed our compensation Peer Group. The Committee removed OMNOVA Solutions Inc., because they were acquired in early 2020 by Synthomer USA, LLC, and replaced them with Patrick Industries, Inc.

Our current compensation Peer Group and the related selection criteria taking into consideration the impactconsists of the separation. The resulting 2016 Peer Group consisted of 20 manufacturing companies. In 2017, our Compensation Committee reviewed the Peer Group and removed Headwaters Incorporated and Nortek, Inc., both of which were acquired by third parties subsequent to the 2016 Peer Group being developed.

For 2017, our Peer Group consisted offollowing 18 manufacturing companies, including:companies:

 

   Allegion PLC Herman Miller Inc. PH Glatfelter Inc.
   AO Smith Corp.Apogee Enterprises, Inc. Interface, Inc. Ply Gem Holdings, Inc.Quanex Building Products Corp
   Apogee Enterprises,Eagle Materials Inc. Knoll, Inc. Quanex Building Products CorpSimpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.
   Ferro Corporation Kraton Performance Polymers Inc. Simpson Manufacturing Co.,Trex Company, Inc.
   Gibraltar Industries,GCP Applied Technologies, Inc.Louisiana-Pacific Corp
   Griffon Corporation Masonite International Corporation 
   HB Fuller Co.Gibraltar Industries, Inc. OMNOVA SolutionsPatrick Industries, Inc.
   Griffon CorporationPGT Innovations, Inc. 

 

Tally Sheets and Wealth Accumulation Analyses

The Compensation Committee uses tally sheets and wealth accumulation analyses when evaluating compensation-related decisions for each NEO.

 

Tally sheets provide historichistorical information on each executive’s equity andnon-equity compensation, and other compensation such as potential payments upon termination of employment.

 

Wealth accumulation analysis assesses the total Company-specific wealth that could be earned by each NEO given certain stock price assumptions.

Compensation Mix

To facilitate the link between NEO pay and Company performance, a significant amount of TDC is performance-based and “at risk.”

In 2017, 81%2020, 84% of our CEO’s target TDC, and 59%65% of the average target TDC of our other NEOs, was performance-basedvariable and “at risk.” The following chart shows the 20172020 compensation mix, consisting of base salary, performance-based AIP, and PSUs as the LTILTIP grants.

 

LOGO

LOGO

 

 

AWI 2018 Proxy Statement42          33AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS(CONTINUED)

 

20172020 COMPENSATION DESIGN AND OUTCOMES

Base Salary

In 2017,2020, the Compensation Committee’sCommittee reviewed the base salaries of our NEOs afterNEOs. After consideration of the competitiveness of each NEO’s base salary compared to the Competitive Market.Market, the Compensation Committee increased base salaries for each of our NEOs. Pay increases were approved during the Compensation Committee meeting held in February 2020 effective April 1, 2017.2020.

In response to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, our Compensation Committee approved a voluntary reduction of 10% in the base salary for Mr. Grizzle and a voluntary reduction of 5% in the base salaries for all other NEOs, effective for the period from June 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020. These base salary reductions were reinstated effective January 1, 2021.

The table below represents the base salary raterates as of December 31.January 1, 2021 when the salary reductions were reinstated. This information differs from the Summary Compensation Table (“SCT”), which reflects the total base salary received for the year.

 

Name  

2016

Salary $

   

2017

Salary $

   Change in
Base
Salary
 

Mr. Grizzle

   700,000    725,000    3.6% 

Mr. MacNeal(1)

   375,000    411,750    9.8% 

Mr. Chiappone

   355,000    370,980    4.5% 

Mr. Cookson

   360,500    371,320    3.0% 

Mr. Hershey(2)

   405,000    405,000    0.0% 
Name 

2019

Salary $

  

2020

Salary $

  

Change in

Base

Salary

 

Victor D. Grizzle(1)

  800,000   900,000   12.5% 

Brian L. MacNeal

  446,250   457,410   2.5% 

Charles M. Chiappone

  441,000   452,030   2.5% 

Mark A. Hershey

  435,950   449,030   3.0% 

Ellen R. Romano

  328,430   338,280   3.0% 
(1)1)

The April 2020 adjustment to Mr. MacNeal’s April 1st adjustmentGrizzle’s base salary was designed to align him closerhis base salary with competitive pay levels. The meritmarket median and to recognize his development and growth.

market increase aligns Mr. MacNeal to 90% of market median.
(2)Mr. Hershey received a $13,200 merit lump sum in lieu of a base salary increase. The market data for Mr. Hershey’s role reflected that his base salary level was above market median, resulting in a merit lump sum payment instead of a base salary adjustment.

Annual Incentive Plan Awards

AIP awards provide an annual incentive opportunity for achieving financial results based on short-term performance goals tied to the Company’s annual operating plan.

Each NEO’s target AIP opportunity (expressed as a percent of base salary) is based on the NEO’s role, responsibility and alignment with similar internal positions internally and the external Competitive Market. Actual payout varies based upon actual business performance relative to performance target, as well as individual performance.

For 2017,2020, AIP awards were determined based on the following formula, measures and weightings and wereall subject to the approval orof our Compensation Committee.

 

 

20172020 AIP Design

 

 

 

Base

Salary Earnings $

 

 x   

Target AIP        

Opportunity %        

 =   

Target        

AIP $        

 x   

Company        and        

Regional        

Performance %        

 x   

Individual        

Performance %        

 =   

Annual AIP        

Payout $        

AWI 2021 Proxy Statement    43


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)

20172020 Target AIP Opportunity

20172020 target AIP opportunities (expressed as a percentage of actual base salary earnings) for NEOs were asare set forth in the table below. There were no changes to theseThe target AIP opportunity percentages from 2016.are the same as for 2019.

 

Name  

Target AIP %

Opportunity

   Target AIP
$
 

Mr. Grizzle

   100%    718,750 

Mr. MacNeal

   60%    241,538 

Mr. Chiappone

   50%    183,493 

Mr. Cookson

   50%    184,308 

Mr. Hershey

   60%    250,920 
Name  

Target AIP %

Opportunity

   

Target AIP

$

 

Victor D. Grizzle

   100%    822,500 

Brian L. MacNeal

   60%    264,767 

Charles M. Chiappone

   60%    261,653 

Mark A. Hershey

   60%    259,598 

Ellen R. Romano

   55%    179,273 

20172020 AIP Performance Metrics

TheOur Compensation Committee selected revenue and EBITDA at the global and regional level as our 2017 AIP performance metrics. The Compensation Committee determined that revenue and EBITDA

wouldmetrics in order to create strong alignment with shareholders inand reflect key measures of value creation. Revenue iswas weighted 25%30% and EBITDA was weighted 75%70%.

These measuresperformance metrics align to key elements of our operating plan and financial goals, including enhanced revenue growth, manufacturing productivity and competitive sales, general and administrative expense levels, and they are a strong indicatorindicators of our overall operating performance.

For purposes of the 20172020 AIP, the Compensation Committee defined: (i) revenue to be gross salesminus returns, discounts and allowances andminus intercompany sales, and (ii) EBITDA to be operating incomeplus depreciation and amortizationplusnon-cash pension impact, subject to certain exceptions. The definitions of these metrics did not change from the prior year. In early 2020 the Compensation Committee established an AIP revenue target of $1,118 million and an AIP EBITDA target of $440 million, both of which were directly tied to the annual operating plan previously approved by our Board. These targets applied to all NEOs and were approved prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

In connection with those targets, the Compensation Committee also established the following performance ranges and associated payout ranges for the 2020 AIP. The Company’s performance was converted to a corresponding payout factor on a straight-line basis between threshold and target and between target and maximum. AIP payouts are capped at 200%. These performance ranges and threshold applied to all of our NEOs and were approved prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

 

 Target $ (in millions)  Performance as % of Target  Payout 
  

 

 Threshold  Target  Maximum  Threshold  Target  Maximum  Threshold  Target  Maximum 

Revenue (weighted 30%)

  1,061.0   1,118.0   1,154.0   95  100  103  50  100  200

EBITDA (weighted 70%)

  408.0   440.0   460.0   93  100  105  50  100  200

In July 2020, our Board of Directors approved a revised annual operating plan. The Compensation Committee then revised AIP design for our eligible broad-based employee population moving to a single metric of EBITDA at a target of $320M; performance range and associated payout range for the revised 2020 AIP is below.    The metric was solely EBITDA, together with an incentive relating to successful merger and acquisition activity. Based on final company results of $325M EBITDA, the resulting payout factor for the broad-based employee population was 56%. Together with the incentive for successful merger and acquisition activity, the resulting final payout factor was 64% for the broad-based employee population. Our NEOs and senior leadership team were excluded from eligibility under the redesigned AIP. The Compensation Committee exercised discretion at year-end for our NEOs based on overall company performance and other factors.

 

 

 Target $ (in millions)  Performance as % of Target  Payout 
  

 

 Threshold  Target  Maximum  Threshold  Target  Maximum  Threshold  Target  Maximum 

EBITDA (weighted 100%)

  304.0   320.0   336.0   95  100  105  30  50  70

 

 
3444          AWI 20182021 Proxy Statement 


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS(CONTINUED)

 

The 20172020 Performance and Payout Factors

Due primarily to the significant decrease in net sales resulting from delays in construction and renovation activity impacting both of our segments during the second through fourth quarters of 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, actual 2020 revenue target of $1,345 million and EBITDA targetperformances were below payout thresholds initially established for AIP. In determining to exercise its discretion and the level of $363 million were both directly tiedAIP payouts to be made to NEOs, the annual operating plan. The Compensation Committee conducted a detailed analysis that took into account a number of factors, includingconsidered financial performance under the revised plan, as well the Company’s operational performance, along with efforts to effectively lead through the pandemic, protect employees and ensure the Company’s strategic plan, analyst expectations, historic performance of the business,

and consideration of achievability, as well as an analysis of the external market and trends, such as expected Peer Group performance and broader market performance. The Americas revenue target of $933 million and EBITDA target of $345 millioninitiatives were directly tied to the 2017 annual operating plan for Americas.

Our Compensation Committee established the following performance ranges and associated payout rangesaccomplished for the 2017 AIP. The Company’s global and regional performance were convertedyear in order to a corresponding payout factor on a straight line basis between Threshold and Target and between Target and Maximum. AIP payout factors are capped at 200%. The Compensation Committee approved AIP design consisting of two leadership tiers. The AIP designposition the Company for continued success in the senior executive tier (Tier I), namely Messrs. Grizzle, MacNeal, Chiappone and Cookson paid 100% for achieving operating targets. Considering the degree of difficulty built into the 2017 operating plan targets,future.

More specifically the Compensation Committee establishedconsidered among other factors, the speed and scope of our response to the pandemic, the work and results on retention and care of our employees, the nature and extent of cost saving initiatives, the breadth, complexity and impact of our business development and M&A activities, and the design, advancement and execution of key strategic themes and initiatives, including the following notable accomplishments:

Minimized customer service disruption and maintained high service levels while deploying broad measures designed to keep employees safe and employed;

Institution of aCOVID-19 emergency leave policy for the benefit of all employees, and made physical changes to plants and corporate campus facilities to enable safe work environment;

Engagement of a new team to focus on the Healthy Spaces market opportunity;

The accelerated launch of the “24/7 Defend” portfolio to address the need for healthier, safer spaces and improve indoor air quality;

The completion of three acquisitions (Turf, Moz and Arktura) in 2020 collectively adding $100M of revenue;

The introduction of a new service, ProjectWorksTM, revolutionizing the way contractors estimate ceilings system costs;

The launch of a new digital e-commerce platform, kanopi;
The advancement of an enterprise-wide Sustainability program; and

The execution of $40M of cost reduction initiatives without furloughs or employee benefit cuts.

In consideration of these and other accomplishments, our Compensation Committee exercised its discretion to approve an AIP payout factor of 110% for achieving target performance for Tier II, which includes Mr. Hershey.

  Target $ (in millions)  Performance as % of Target  Payout 
   Threshold  Target  Maximum  Threshold  Target  Maximum  Threshold  Target  Maximum 

Global Revenue (Senior Executive Tier)

  1,254.0   1,318.0   1,412.0   93  100  105  50  100%*   200

Global EBITDA (Senior Executive Tier)

  317.0   363.0   403.0   87  100  111  50  100%*   200

Americas Revenue

  855.0   933.0   964.0   92  100  103  50  100  200

Americas EBITDA

  298.0   345.0   383.0   86  100  111  50  100  200
*Equates to a 110% payout for Mr. Hershey

The AIP opportunity for the NEOs with primary responsibilities at the global Company level, namely Messrs. Grizzle, MacNeal, Chiappone and Hershey, were weighted 100% to Global results. The AIP opportunity for Mr. Cookson, who has regional responsibility56% for our Americas region, was weighted 30% to global results and 70%NEOs for 2020, which payout factor aligned to the region.payout determined for our broad-based employee population for EBITDA performance under the redesigned AIP.

WeightingGlobalRegion

Mr. Grizzle

100%

Mr. MacNeal

100%

Mr. Chiappone

100%

Mr. Cookson

30%70% (Americas)

Mr. Hershey

100%

20172020 Individual Performance

The Board and the Compensation Committee also considered individual performance when finalizing AIP awards for the CEO and other NEOs and approvedNEOs. The Compensation Committee modified the AIP payout for Mr. MacNeal by applying an 85% individual performance adjustment for Mr. Hershey of 20%. In 2017, Mr. Hershey led key initiatives to (a) sell the Company’s International Business and (b) obtain insurance recoveries in respect of legacy environmental liabilities. For AIP awards intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, any individual performance adjusted payout cannot exceed the maximum level determinedmodifier based on achievementan assessment of revenue and EBITDAindividual performance, prior to adjustment. The adjustment for Mr. Hershey did not exceed the maximum level based on performance. No other NEO had their AIP adjusted due to performance.

AWI 2018 Proxy Statement    35


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS(CONTINUED)

2017 Performance and Payout Factors

Our 2017 global revenue performance was 98% of plan resulting in an 85% payout and our global EBITDA performance represented 94% of plan with a corresponding 76% payout. These results yielded combinedadjusted payout factor of 79% for the senior executive tier, Tier I. For Tier II, 2017 global revenue performance resulted in a 101% payout and global EBITDA performance resulted in a 79% payout, for a combined payout factor of 84%48%. Our 2017 Americas revenue performance was 96% of plan resulting in a 75% payout and EBITDA performance represented 92% of plan resulting in a 71% payout. The Compensation Committee approved a final payout factor of 74% for Americas revenue and EBITDA performance.Performance modifiers were not applied to any other NEO.

The Compensation Committee has discretion to adjust AIP payouts to take into account overall Company performance and other factors, subject to the limitation described above for awards that are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. No discretionary adjustments were made for 2017 results.

Further details are shown in the table below:

Measure 

2017

Target

$M

  

2017

Actual

$M*

  

Performance

%

  

Payout

%

 

Global – Revenue (Senior Executive Tier)

  1,345.0   1,318.0   98%   85% 

Global –EBITDA (Senior Executive Tier)

  363.0   341.0   94  76% 

Global – Revenue (Tier II)

  1,345.0   1,318.0   98%   101% 

Global – EBITDA (Tier II)

  363.0   341.0   94  79% 

Americas – Revenue

  933.0   894.0   96%   75% 

Americas – EBITDA

  345.0   318.0   92%   71% 

20172020 Final AIP Awards

The Compensation Committee determined the final 20172020 AIP payouts by multiplying each NEO’s target AIP amountopportunity by the final weighted payout factors as outlined below.

 

Name  

Target

AIP $

   Payout
Factor
  

2017 Final

AIP

Award $

 

Mr. Grizzle

   718,750    79  567,820 

Mr. MacNeal

   241,538    79  190,820 

Mr. Chiappone

   183,493    79  144,960 

Mr. Hershey(1)

   250,920    84  210,780 

Name  

Target

AIP $

   

Payout

Factor

  

2020 Final

AIP

Award $

 

Victor D. Grizzle

   822,500    56  460,600 

Brian L. MacNeal(1)

   264,767    56  126,030 

Charles M. Chiappone

   261,653    56  146,530 

Mark A. Hershey

   259,598    56  145,380 

Ellen R. Romano

   179,273    56  100,400 
(1)

The final AIP award for Mr. Hershey receivedMacNeal reflects a 120%reduction in payout of $22,240 as a result of an applied individual performance modifier which resulted in an increase in payout of $42,160.85%.

For Mr. Cookson, the Compensation Committee approved a final payout factor of 74%, reflecting a weighting of 30% global results (revenue and EBITDA) and 70% for regional results (revenue and EBITDA).

Name 

Target

AIP $

  Weighted
Global
Payout
Factor
(wtd. 30%)
  Weighted
Regional
Payout
Factor
(wtd. 70%)
  2017
Final
AIP
Payout
Factor %
  

2017

Final

AIP

Award $

 

Mr. Cookson

  184,308   79%   72%   74%   136,390 

Long-Term Incentive Program Awards 2020-2022 Performance Period

The goal of our LTIP is to provide equity-based long-term incentive awards that link management interests to shareholder returns and focus management on our long-term performance.

AWI 2021 Proxy Statement    45


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)

In determining the LTIP award opportunity for the CEO and other NEOs, our Board and Compensation Committee consider a number of factors, including

the Competitive Market, internal equity and cost (dilution and accounting cost), as well as tally sheet and wealth accumulation analyses.

LOGO

LTIP awards for a given year are typically made two business days following the release of our financial results for our prior fiscal year. This allows sufficient time forgovernance practice is designed to allow the marketequity markets to absorb the announcement of earnings and current year performance guidance.

36    AWI 2018 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS(CONTINUED)

The 20172020 LTIP grants for the 2020 – 2022 performance period consisted of differentiated awards based on two leadership tiers. The Compensation Committee granted PSUs to the most senior executive tier, namely Messrs. Grizzle, MacNeal, Chiappone and Cookson to vest based on achievement of Absolute TSR (75%(60% of the award), FCF (30% of the award) and FCF (25%MFV (10% of the award). The Compensation Committee granted PSUs to Mr. Hershey to vest based on achievement of Absolute TSR (25% of the award) and FCF (75% of the award), consistent with Tier II awards. Our Compensation Committee selected Absolute TSR as a metric in our LTIP because we believe it best represents and captures shareholder value creation (particularly as compared to other financial metrics), while providing senior management with the enhanced flexibility and levers needed to drive meaningful performance changes. Our Compensation Committee selected FCF as a metric in our LTIP because it believes FCF will create a strong alignment with performance activities and growth over the performance period.

Messrs. Grizzle, MacNeal Chiappone and CooksonChiappone have post-vesting holding requirements for amounts payable above target in our 2017for the 2020 performance-based equity grants. If earned, the shares earned above target shares must be held for one year following the vesting date.

2017 LTI2020 LTIP Performance Metrics and Weighting

The number of shares eligible to vest under the 2017 LTI2020 LTIP awards is based on the achievement of applicable performance targets relative to Absolute TSR, FCF and FCFMFV targets during the performance period (January 1, 20172020 to December 31, 2019)2022). The grants, intended to compensate for long termbased on long-term value creation, have a three-year performance period to allow a reasonable timeframe for value creation, challenging targets with substantial payout upside for breakout performance and a payout scale that defines meaningful performance hurdles. The PSUs for Messrs. Grizzle, MacNeal, Chiappone and Cookson (Tier I)the NEOs can vest at 0% to 275%53% of target and the PSUs for Mr. Hershey (Tier II) can vest at 0%threshold performance to 225%270% of target.target at maximum performance. There is no payout below threshold performance.

46    AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)

Absolute TSR tracks the appreciation in share price of the Company’s Common Stock, including dividends, and is annualized for the performance period. The ending share price for the Absolute TSR calculation will be based on the volume weighted

volume-weighted, average closing price of the Company stock for the highest consecutive 30 trading days in the 60 trading day period60-trading-day-period beginning with and immediately following January 2, 2020.3, 2023. The starting price was based on the volume weightedvolume-weighted average of the highest consecutive 30 trading days in the subsequent 60 trading day period60-trading-day-period closing price of the Company stock for the highest 30 trading days immediately following January 3, 20172, 2020 – resulting in $45.12$103.96 per share.

 

         Incentive Payout 
Performance
to TSR Target
  

Annualized

TSR

Target

   

Ending

Share

Price

 

Tier I

(75%
weighting)

 

Tier II

(25%
weighting)

  

Annualized

TSR

Target

 

Ending

Share

Price

 Incentive
Payout
 

50%

   6%   $53.74   0%   50% 

60%

  6.0%  $123.82   50% 

75%

   9%   $58.43   25%   75%   7.5%  $129.05   75% 

83%

   10%   $60.05   50%   83%   8.3%  $132.05   83% 

100%

   12%   $63.39   100%   100%   10.0%  $138.37   100% 

167%

   20%    $77.97   200%   200%   16.7%  $165.23   200% 

250%

   30%   $99.13   300%   300% 

200%

  25.0%  $179.64   300% 

Cumulative FCF is defined as cash flow from operations less cash used in investing activities.activities, adjusted for the impact of cash used or proceeds received for acquisitions and divestitures and environmental insurance recoveries and expenses, and the cash impact of certain other non-recurring extraordinary items outside of the normal course of our business.

 

    Incentive Payout 
Performance
to FCF Target
 FCF $(M) 

Tier I

(25% weighting)

 

Tier II

(75% weighting)

  FCF $(M) 

Incentive

Payout

 

80%

 $392   25%   50%   $   739   50% 

100%

 $490   100%   100%   $   924   100% 

113%

 $553   150%   150%   $1,044   150% 

118%

 $578   175%   175%   $1,090   175% 

125%

 $612   200%   200%   $1,155   200% 

MFV is defined as total square feet of Mineral Fiber products sold during the plan period. The Miner Fiber definition is consistent with that used for the external reporting segment.

MFV

(Million Sq Ft in 2020)

 CAGR  

Incentive

Payout

 

878

  -0.5%   80% 

904

  0.5%   100% 

946

  2.0%   200% 

960

  2.5%   300% 

20172020 Target LTILTIP

The Compensation Committee annually determines LTIthe LTIP target opportunity (expressed as a percent of base salary) based on each NEO’s role, responsibility, alignment with similar positions internally and the external Competitive Market, as well as a review of tally sheets and wealth accumulation analyses.

After a review of the Competitive Market data provided by Willis Towers Watson during the Compensation Committee meeting held in February 2020, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Grizzle’s target LTIP opportunity in 20172020 to $2,300,000.$3,700,000. This adjustment to Mr. Grizzle’s LTIP valueopportunity positioned him at 83% of the market median TDC. Mr. Chiappone’s LTIP opportunity increased to 130% from 110% of base salary to align to market median TDC. Mr. Hershey’s LTIP opportunity increased to 140% from 125% of base salary in recognition of his expanded role, as the leader of our Business Development function. No other LTIP targets were adjusted in 2017.2020.

 

 

 

 AWI 20182021 Proxy Statement          3747


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS(CONTINUED)

 

The respective target percentages for annual LTIP grants to our NEOs in 20172020 and the resulting Grant Date Fair Valuegrant date fair value are set forth in the table below.

 

Name  

2017 LTIP Target

as % of Base

Salary

   2017 LTI Annual
Target Value  ($)(1)
 

Mr. Grizzle

   317%    2,300,000 

Mr. MacNeal

   100%    375,000 

Mr. Chiappone

   75%    266,300 

Mr. Cookson

   75%    270,400 

Mr. Hershey

   125%    506,300 
Name 

2020 LTIP Target

as % of Base

Salary

  

2020 LTIP Annual

Target Value ($)(1)

 

Victor D. Grizzle

  411%   3,700,000 

Brian L. MacNeal

  120%   535,500 

Charles M. Chiappone

  130%   573,300 

Mark A. Hershey

  140%   610,300 

Ellen R. Romano

  100%   328,400 
(1)

Amounts represent the grant date fairtargeted value forof the long-term incentive equity awardawards granted in February 2017,2020, as calculated under the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. Under ASC Topic 718, the grant date fair value is calculated using the closing market price of our shares of Common Stock ($46.00)105.59) on the date of the grant (February 28, 2017)25, 2020).

2017Payout of 2018-2020 Performance Restricted Stock Units

The performance for PSUs awarded in 2018 for the 2018 – 2020 performance period was determined on April 5, 2021. The awards were based on Absolute TSR and FCF over the performance period. The Compensation Committee granted PSUs to Messrs. Grizzle, MacNeal and Chiappone to vest based on achievement of Absolute TSR (75% of the award) and FCF (25% of the award). The Compensation Committee granted PSUs to Mr. Hershey and Ms. Romano to vest based on achievement of Absolute TSR (25% of the award) and FCF (75% of the award).

Based upon performance during the measurement period, the Absolute TSR achievement for the 2018-2020 period was 13.2%, with a calculated price of $90.21. This exceeded our 10.5% annualized TSR target resulting in a 139% payout. The starting share price for the TSR PSUs was $62.18. The cumulative FCF was $692M for the performance period, below our target of $700.6M. The Committee approved a payout factor of 95% for Messrs. Grizzle, MacNeal and Chiappone and 97% for Mr. Hershey and Ms. Romano. The difference in FCF payout factors resulted in the performance scale established in 2018. Messrs. Grizzle, MacNeal and Chiappone had a FCF scale with threshold at 25% and maximum at 200% and the threshold for Mr. Hershey and Ms. Romano’s scale was 50% with maximum at 200%. Based on the metrics and the certified Absolute TSR and FCF results, the PSUs for Messrs. Grizzle, MacNeal and Chiappone vested at 128% of target and the PSUs

for Mr. Hershey and Ms. Romano vested at 108% of target. For Messrs. Grizzle, MacNeal and Chiappone, PSUs distributed in excess of target must be held for one year following the vesting date.

Name 

2018 PSU

Shares

Granted

(#)

  

2018 PSU

Payout

Factor

  

2018 PSU

Final Payout

(#)

 

Victor D. Grizzle

  52,454   128  67,142 

Brian L. MacNeal

  7,664   128  9,811 

Charles M. Chiappone

  6,276   128  8,034 

Mark A. Hershey

  8,567   108  9,211 

Ellen R. Romano

  5,290   108  5,687 

2020 Total Direct Compensation

The table below summarizes TDC paid or awarded to our current NEOs during 2017.2020. This table is not intended to be a substitute for the SCT or Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table (‘‘GPBAT’’). Base salary reflects the total salary paid for 2017.2020 reflective of the April 2020 salary increase and the subsequent reductions related to COVID-19. AIP awards and LTIP awards for 20172020 are reflected in the SCT and GPBAT. LTIP awards are shown at target and represent an incentive for future performance, not current cash compensation, and are “at risk” of forfeiture.

 

Name  

2017

Salary $

   

2017

Final

AIP $

   

2017

LTIP $(1)

   TDC $ 

Mr. Grizzle

   718,750    567,820    2,300,000    3,586,570 

Mr. MacNeal

   402,563    190,820    375,000    968,383 

Mr. Chiappone

   366,985    144,960    266,300    778,245 

Mr. Cookson

   368,615    136,390    270,400    775,405 

Mr. Hershey

   418,200    252,940    506,300    1,177,440 
Name 

2020

Salary
Earnings
$

  

2020

Final

AIP $

  

2020

LTIP $ (1)

  TDC $ 

Victor D. Grizzle

  822,500   460,600   3,700,000   4,983,100 

Brian L. MacNeal

  441,279   126,030   535,500   1,102,809 

Charles M. Chiappone

  436,088   146,530   573,300   1,155,918 

Mark A. Hershey

  432,663   145,380   610,300   1,188,343 

Ellen R. Romano

  325,951   100,400   328,400   754,751 
(1)

Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fairtargeted value for LTIPof the long-term incentive equity awards granted in 2017,February 2020, as calculated under the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. Under ASC Topic 718, the grant date fair value is calculated usingwing the closing market price of our Common Stockshares of common stock ($105.59) on the date of the grant.grant (February 25, 2020).

20182021 Compensation Program Design

On February 20, 2018, Mr. Cookson announced his decision to retire as Senior Vice President, Americas effective July 1, 2018 after 39 years of service. In connection with Mr. Cookson’s

retirement, Mr. Chiappone was named Senior Vice President, Ceiling and Wall Solutions effective April 1, 2018, and will be responsible for leading the Mineral Fiber and Architectural Specialties segments of the Company. Effective April 1, 2018, Mr. Chiappone’s compensation will be:

Base Salary of $420,000;

Annual Incentive Plan Target at 60% of base salary; and

Long-Term Incentive Plan Target at 100% of base salary.

For 2018,2021, the Compensation Committee reviewed the design of our executive compensation program and decided to continue our 2017maintain the 2020 metrics for our AIP plan, and maintain the 2017 designLTIP, namely Absolute TSR, FCF and metrics for our LTIP.MFV.

48    AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING OUR COMPENSATION PROGRAMS

Qualified andNon-qualifiedNon-Qualified Defined Benefit Pension Plans

Mr. Cookson isMs. Romano was the only NEO who participatesparticipated in the Company’s qualified defined benefit pension plan, the Retirement Income Plan (“RIP”), which was closed to newly hired salaried employees after January 1, 2005. Pension benefits were frozen for all salaried employees on December 31, 2017.

Anon-qualified defined benefit pension plan, the Retirement Benefit Equity Plan (“RBEP”), pays benefits that cannot be paid under the RIP due to statutory limits. Mr. Cookson is the only NEO who met the qualificationsThis plan was also closed to remain in the RBEP.newly hired salaried employees after January 1, 2005 and pension benefits were frozen on December 31, 2017.

Qualified Defined Contribution Savings Plan andNon-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan

The Company maintains a 401(k) plan. For salaried employees, who do not participate in the RIP, we provide a 401(k) match of 100% on the first 4% of employee contributions and a 50% match on the next 4% of employee contributions.contributions for a maximum company match of 6%. All NEOs except for Mr. Cookson, participateparticipated in this program.

Mr. Cookson is eligible to receive a lower 401(k) match of 50% on 6% of employee contributions because he participatesprogram in the RIP and RBEP.2020.

The Company offers an unfunded, nonqualified deferred compensation plan, the Armstrong Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, to restore Company contributions that would be lost due to Internal Revenue Code limits on

38    AWI 2018 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS(CONTINUED)

compensation that can be taken into account under the Company’stax-qualified 401(k) plan and to allow participants to voluntarily elect to defer base salary and AIP until a future date.

Participants in the Armstrong Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (“NQDCCP”) receive a Company match identical to the 401(k) companyCompany match on compensation in excess of the Internal Revenue Code limits, up to a maximum contribution of 6% of eligible earnings. All NEOs with exception of Mr. Cookson, are eligible to participateparticipated in this program.program in 2020.

SeparationSeverance Arrangements

Each NEO has a separationseverance agreement with the Company. These agreements are designed to:

 

Assureassure continuity of executive management during the evaluation and execution of any transaction that may result in loss of or material changes to employment;

Reduce

reduce risk to the Company and provide shareholder alignment by keeping executives neutral to job loss when pursuing actions that may result in termination of employment;

 

Ensureensure executive management is able to objectively evaluate any transaction and act in the best interests of shareholders during the design and execution of anysuch a transaction; and

 

Definedefine transition support and terms in the event ofnot-for-cause termination.

Payments upon Termination of Employment

Our separationseverance arrangements provide that thefor executive will be entitledentitlement to receive certain cash severance benefits if the executive’s employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or by the executive for Good Reason (as such terms are defined in the separationseverance agreement). Under the separationseverance agreements that apply in absence of a change in control the severance is equal to (i) 1.5 times (two times in the case of Mr. Grizzle) the executive’s then-current annual base salary plus target annual incentive under the AIP program, payable in a lump sum, and (ii) apro-rated annual incentive bonus based on actual performance for the year of termination, payable at the time that bonuses are paid to employees of the Company generally.

Under each executive’s separationseverance agreement, the executive is entitled to receive severance payments upon involuntary termination without Cause or termination for Good Reason within two years

following a change in control (“CIC”), or within six months preceding a CIC if the termination is in connection with a potential CIC. In a change in controlCIC the severance is equal to (i) two times (2.5 times in the case of Mr. Grizzle) the executive’s then-current annual base salary plus target annual incentive under the AIP program, payable in a lump sum, and (ii) apro-rated annual incentive bonus based on actual performance for the year of termination, payable at the time that bonuses are paid to employees of the Company generally.

AWI 2021 Proxy Statement    49


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)

LOGO

None of the separationseverance agreements provide for taxgross-ups under Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code. For more information regarding our NEO separation arrangements, please refer to the “Potential Payments upon Termination ofor Change in Control” section on page 51.62.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Compensation Committee maintains stock ownership guidelines for our NEOs to ensure that our NEOs have significant long-term value creation tied to stock price appreciation. Ownership requirements and progress toward their achievement are reviewed annually as part of the compensation planning process. A significant percentage of each NEO’s compensation is directly linked to our stock price appreciation. The guidelines to require retention of 100% of net shares acquired upon any vesting or exercise of equity awards until the ownership guidelines are met.

The stock ownership guidelines for our NEOs are calculated as a fixed number of shares using a required ownership multiple, the executive’s annualized base salary as of a certain date, and the stock price as of a fixed date. The required ownership multiple is six times annual base pay for our CEO and is three times annual base pay for our other NEOs.

For purposes of the stock ownership guidelines, we include direct ownership of shares and stock units held inunder employee plans. Stock options are included to the extent they arein-the-money”.in-the-money.” PSUs are not included in determining whether an executive has achieved the ownership levels.

The stock ownership guidelines require achievement of the ownership multiple within five years from date of hire or promotion into the role for the NEOs.

AWI 2018 Proxy Statement    39


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS(CONTINUED)

The Compensation Committee last reviewed the NEOs’ progress toward meeting the stock ownership requirements in December 2017.2020. As of the date of the review, Messrs. Grizzle, Cookson and Hersheyall of our NEOs had met their ownership requirements.

Restrictive Covenants

Each NEO separationhas a restrictive covenants agreement includesas part of their severance agreement. The agreements require the following restrictive covenants:following:

 

forFor 12 months following a termination the NEO shall not, directly for the NEO or any third party, become engaged in any business or activity which is directly in competition with any services or products sold by, or any business or activity engaged in by, the Company or any of its affiliates;

50    AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)

 

for

For 24 months following a termination, the NEO shall not solicit any person who was a customer of the Company or any of its affiliates during the period of the NEO’s employment hereunder, or solicit potential customers who are or were identified through leads developed during the course of employment with the Company, or otherwise divert or attempt to divert any existing business of the Company or any of its affiliates; and

 

For 24 months following a termination, the NEO shall not, directly for the NEO or any third party, solicit, induce, recruit or cause another person in the employment of the Company or any of its affiliates to terminate such employee���semployee’s employment for the purposes of joining, associating, or becoming employed with any business or activity which is in competition with any services or products sold, or any business or activity engaged in, by the Company or any of its affiliates.

Recoupment Policy

OurUnder our 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee has the ability to exercise discretion and take action to recoup certainsettled or unsettled stock-based and cash awards from a plan participant in the event his or her employment is terminated for willful, deliberate or gross misconduct, as, for example, if we were required to prepare following events:

an accounting restatement of the Company’s financial statements that is required due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirementrequirements under the securities laws asand GAAP;

the participant is involved in (i) the commission of a resultfelony or a crime involving moral turpitude; (ii) fraud, dishonesty, misrepresentation, theft or misappropriation of suchfunds; (iii) a violation of our Code of Conduct or employment policies; or (iv) gross negligence or willful, deliberate or gross misconduct, that results in significant financial or reputational harm to the Company;

during the participant’s misconduct which led to his or her termination of employment or if athe one-year period thereafter, the participant engages in business that is competitive with the Company or substantially injurious conduct after terminationto the Company’s business interests;

during the participant’s employment or the two-year period thereafter, the participant solicits the Company’s customers or employees; or
the participant breaches any written noncompetition, confidentiality or non-solicitation covenant with the Company.

All of

employment. To our NEOs are subject to the extent thatabove recoupment terms of the SEC adopts additional rules for clawback that require changes to our plans or policies, we will revise them, as appropriate.plan.

Prohibition on Hedging and Derivative Trading

All members of our Board and senior management, including our NEOs and certain other employees, are required to clear any transaction involving Company securities with our General Counsel’s office prior to entering into such transaction.

By policy, we prohibit derivative transactions in our Company securities, including:

 

Trading in puts, calls, covered calls, or other derivative products involving Company securities.

 

Engaging in any hedging transaction with respect to Company securities.

 

Holding Company securities in a margin account or pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan.

We permit senior management to utilizeuse stock trading plans that comply with Rule10b5-1 of the Exchange Act. All such plans are subject to ourpre-approval, and the ability to enter into such plans remains subject to policy prohibitions on trading while in possession of materialnon-public information.

Assessment and Management of Risk

We monitor the risks associated with our compensation program on an ongoing basis. In addition, we are committed to performing formal assessments on a periodic basis. At the conclusion of the most recent analysis (conducted in 2017)2020) of our compensation programs and associated risks, it was the assessment of the Compensation Committee that our compensation programs are structured and operated with an appropriate balance of risk and reward and, by their design, do not encourage executives to take unnecessary, excessive, or inappropriate risks and do not create risks reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. Accordingly, there were no material adjustments made to our compensation policies and practices. We will continue to monitor our compensation policies and practices to

determine whether our risk management objectives

AWI 2021 Proxy Statement    51


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)

are being met with respect to incentivizing the Company’s employees.

Tax Deductibility of Compensation

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code imposes a $1 million limit on the amount a public company may deduct for compensation paid to certain of the Company’s highest paid officers.

40    AWI 2018 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS(CONTINUED)

For 2017, this limitation did not apply2020, the executive officers to compensation that meetswhom the Internal Revenue Code requirements for “qualifying performance-based” compensation (i.e., compensation paid only ifSection 162(m) deduction limit applies included the individual’s performance meetspre-established objective goals based on performance criteria approved by shareowners).

The Tax CutsCompany’s Chief Executive Officer and Jobs Act of 2017 eliminated the exception for “qualifying performance based compensation” and certain other exceptions to theChief

deduction limit under Section 162(m). The changes are effective for tax years beginning afterFinancial Officer, the next three most highly compensated executive officers, and any persons who were such “covered employees” in 2017 except for certain grandfathered arrangements.or a later year.

The Compensation Committee considers both tax and accounting treatment in establishing our compensation program. The Compensation Committee retains discretion to authorize compensation arrangements that are not fully tax deductible as it deems appropriate.

 

 

AWI 2018 Proxy Statement52          41AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Management Development and Compensation Committee (MDCC) of our Board has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of RegulationS-K with our management. Based on this review and discussion, the Management Development and Compensation CommitteeMDCC recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

Submitted by the Management Development and Compensation Committee

Stan A. Askren, Chair

Larry S. McWilliamsBarbara L. Loughran

James C. Melville

Gregory P. Spivy

Roy W. TemplinWayne R. Shurts

Cherryl T. Thomas

This report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC, nor incorporated by reference into any future SEC filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference therein.

 

LOGO

42AWI 2021 Proxy Statement          AWI 2018 Proxy Statement53


20172020 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The table below sets forth the total compensation for our NEOs during fiscal 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015.2018.

 

Name and
Principal Position
 Year  

Salary

($)

  

Bonus(3)

($)

  

Stock

Awards(1)

($)

  

Option

Awards(1)

($)

  

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan
Compensation(2)

($)

  

Change in

Pension Value

& Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

($)

  

All Other

Compensation(4)

($)

  

Total

($)

 

Mr. Grizzle

  2017   718,750   —     2,300,000   —     567,820   —     92,921   3,679,491 
President and Chief  2016   650,050   —     5,250,000   —     754,930   —     68,977   6,723,957 

Executive Officer

  2015   496,558   —     874,000   —     424,560   —     88,951   1,884,069 

Mr. MacNeal

  2017   402,563   —     375,000   —     190,820   —     32,642   1,001,025 

Senior Vice

  2016   347,875   —     1,125,000   —     238,400   —     21,339   1,732,614 
President and Chief Financial Officer         

Mr. Chiappone

  2017   366,985   —     266,300   —     144,960   —     23,122   801,367 
Senior Vice President,         
Ceiling Solutions         

Mr. Cookson

  2017   368,615   —     270,400   —     136,390   615,964   9,982   1,401,351 
Senior Vice President  2016   371,315   —     811,200   —     211,650   375,379   9,331   1,778,875 
Americas         

Mr. Hershey

  2017   418,200   —     506,300   —     252,940   —     48,413   1,225,853 
Senior Vice President,  2016   415,675   671,550   1,071,300   —     304,280   —     57,373   2,520,178 
General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer  2015   443,925   —     605,600   —     388,880   —     69,627   1,508,032 
Name and
Principal Position
 Year 

Salary

($)

 

Bonus

($)

 

Stock

Awards(1)

($)

 

Option

Awards(1)

($)

 

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan
Compensation(2)

($)

 

Change in

Pension Value

& Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings(4)

($)

 

All Other

Compensation(5)

($)

 

Total

($)

Victor D. Grizzle   2020   822,500   —     3,539,454   —     460,600   —     250,488   5,073,042

President and

Chief Executive

Officer

   

2019

2018


   

787,500

743,750


   

—  

—  


   

3,300,000

3,100,000


   

—  

—  


   

826,880

803,250


   

—  

—  


   

195,375

83,319


   

5,109,755

4,730,319


Brian L. MacNeal

   2020   441,279   —     512,304   —     126,030   —     40,033   1,119,646
Senior Vice   2019   440,938   —     510,000   —     277,800   —     56,917   1,285,655

President and

Chief Financial

Officer

   2018   421,688   —     452,900   —     273,260   —     31,523   1,179,371

Charles M.

Chiappone

   

2020

2019


   

436,088

435,750


   

—  

—  


   

548,463

462,000


   

—  

—  


   

146,530

274,530


   

—  

—  


   

40,942

39,406


   

1,172,023

1,211,686


Senior Vice President, Wall

and Ceiling Solutions

   2018   407,745   —     370,900   —     292,340   —     18,500   1,089,485
Mark A. Hershey   2020   432,663   —     583,815   —     145,380   —     74,029   1,235,887

Senior Vice President,

General Counsel, Chief

Compliance Officer and Business Development

   

2019

2018


   

431,758

415,635


   

—  

280,000


(3)

 
   

524,000

506,300


   

—  

—  


   

272,010

269,340


   

—  

—  


   

54,226

44,207


   

1,281,994

1,515,479


Ellen R. Romano   2020   325,951   —     314,226   —     100,400   513,426   48,611   1,302,614

Senior Vice President,

Human Resources

   

2019

2018


   

326,428

318,473


   

—  

—  


   

320,400

312,600


   

—  

—  


   

188,520

189,180


   

958,061

—  


   

35,987

34,159


   

1,829,396

854,412


 

(1)

The amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of stock units granted in the fiscal year, computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. Under ASC Topic 718, the grant date fair value is calculated using the closing price of the Company’s shares of Common Stock ($46.00)105.59) on the date of grant (February 28, 2017).25, 2020) for the Free Cash Flow and Mineral Fiber Volume components. For the aTSR component, we used the Monte Carlo valuation which was $97.75. The 20172020 LTIP awards consist of PSUs only.PSUs. The target and maximum payouts for the PSUs are as follows: target of $2,300,000$3,539,454 and maximum of $6,325,000$9,556,526 for Mr. Grizzle, target of $375,000$512,304 and maximum of $1,031,250$1,383,221 for Mr. MacNeal, target of $266,300$548,463 and maximum of $732,325$1,480,850 for Mr. Chiappone, target of $270,400$583,815 and maximum of $743,600$1,576,301 for Mr. Cookson (maximums are 275% of target),Hershey, and target of $506,300$314,226 and maximum of $1,139,175$848,410 for Mr. HersheyMs. Romano (maximums are 225%270% of target).

 

(2)

The 20172020 amounts disclosed are the awards under the 20172020 AIP.

 

(3)Amounts payable under retention agreements that were entered

Mr. Hershey received a one-time special cash bonus of $280,000 on October 25, 2018. The bonus was paid in 2015recognition of his leadership and were contingent on the successful separation of AFI.performance in connection with certain significant projects. The retention payments were made upon the successful execution of the separation in April 2016.

special bonus was separate from our AIP.

 

(4)

For 2018, the change in pension value decreased from 2017 due to the higher discount rate for Ms. Romano. The decline in value was ($205,437).

(5)

The amounts shown in the “All Other Compensation” column include: (i) Company matching contributioncontributions to the Savings and Investment 401(k) Plan and to the NQDCP; (ii) premiums for long-term disability insurance; (iii) termination payments (severance); (iv) relocation expenses; (v) cash dividends and (v)(vi) personal benefits (“perquisites”) consisting of medical examinations and financial planning expense reimbursements to the extent the total perquisite value is $10,000 or greater per individual. For each person the total value of all such perquisites did not reach $10,000.

 

AWI 2018 Proxy Statement54          43AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


20172020 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE(CONTINUED)

 

(5)(6)

The following table provides the detail for the amounts reported in the All Other Compensation for 20172020 for each NEO:

 

Name  

Perquisites

and Other

Benefits

($)

   

Company

Match

Savings Plan

Contributions

($)

   

Executive

Long-

Term

Disability

($)

   

All Other

Compensation

($)

 

Mr. Grizzle

     92,921    0    92,921 

Mr. MacNeal

     32,642    0    32,642 

Mr. Chiappone

     23,122      23,122 

Mr. Cookson

     8,152    1,830    9,982 

Mr. Hershey

        46,583    1,830    48,413 
Name  

Perquisites

and Other

Benefits

($)

  Cash
Dividends
($)
  

Company

Match

Savings Plan

Contributions

($)

  

Executive

Long-

Term

Disability

($)

  

All Other

Compensation

($)

Victor D. Grizzle

    —      144,650    105,838    —      250,488

Brian L. MacNeal

    —      23,587    16,446    —      40,033

Charles M. Chiappone

    —      16,750    24,193    —      40,943

Mark A. Hershey

    —      27,848    44,753    1,428    74,029

Ellen R. Romano

    —      17,081    30,103    1,428    48,612

CEO Pay Ratio

 

Our philosophy is to pay our employees competitively with employees in similar positions in the applicable labor market. We follow this approach globally,in every country where we have employees, whether it be an executive level position or hourly job. As such, we typically benchmark by position to the applicable labor market every year and adjust compensation to match the applicable market. By doing so, we believe we maintain a high-quality, stable workforce. The compensation we paid to the median employee identified below was benchmarked in accordance with this process to verify competitive compensation.

There has been no change in the company’s employee population or employee compensation arrangements that would result in a significant change in the pay ratio disclosure. Further, there has been no change in the circumstances of the employee identified as the median employee in 2019. Accordingly, the pay ratio calculation has been made using the 2020 compensation for the median employee identified in 2019.

As a result of rules the SEC adopted under the Dodd-Frank Act, we are providing the following disclosure about the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the annual total compensation of our median employee. For the year ended December 31, 2017:2020:

 

the annual total compensation of our median employee was reasonably estimated to be $73,970;

$75,972,

the annual total compensation of our CEO was $3,679,491;$5,233,588; and

 

based on this information, the ratio of the annual total compensation of the CEO to that of the median employee is estimated to be 50:69:1.

We identified our median employee using a multistep process that is permitted under the SEC rules. We first examined the annual taxable earnings paid to each of our employees during 2017,2019, which we gathered from payroll data. Then, we excluded 162seven non-U.S. employees in countries outside the U.S. where the headcount is less than approximately 35, as allowed under the deminimis exception to the SEC rules.Latin America. The total numbers of U.S. employees andnon-U.S. employees were 2,1461,578 and 1,754,197, respectively, before taking into account such exclusions and for purposes of calculating such exclusions.

Countries and number of employees (162 in total) excluded:

   Mexico — 3Brazil — 4Australia —38                Hong Kong — 10
   Taiwan — 1Indonesia —2                Malaysia — 1Philippines — 2
   Singapore — 1Thailand — 1Vietnam — 2Czech Republic —35                
   United Arab Emirates — 10Italy — 6Spain — 5Portugal — 1
   Ireland — 2Turkey — 2Netherlands — 35Kazakhstan — 1

We annualized the total taxable compensation paid to those employees who commenced work with us during 20172019 and therefore did not work for us the entire calendar year. Using this annual taxable compensation data, we identified the employee

whose total taxable compensation was closest to the median. We then calculated the total annual compensation of the median employee, in the same way as we calculate total annual compensation for our CEO in the Summary Compensation Table.

 

 

44AWI 2021 Proxy Statement          AWI 2018 Proxy Statement55


GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

The table below shows information on AIP awards and PSUs granted to each NEO in 2017.2020. There is no assurance that the grant date fair value of PSU/RSU awards will be realized by the executive.

 

       

 

Estimated Future

Payouts Under

Non-Equity Incentive Plan

Awards

  

 

Estimated Future

Payouts Under

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards

  

All Other

Stock

Awards:

Number of

Shares of

Stock or

Units

(#)

  

All Other

Option

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Under-Lying

Options

(#)

  

Exercise or

Base Price

of Option

Awards

($/Sh)

  

Grant Date

Fair Value

of Stock

and Option

Awards

($)

 
Name    Grant
Date
 

Threshold

($)

  

Target

($)

  

Maximum

($)

  Threshold
(#)
  

Target

(#)

  Maximum
(#)
     

Mr. Grizzle

  (1)  N/A  359,375   718,750   1,437,500                             
  (2)  2/28/2017     12,500   50,000   137,500      2,300,000  

Mr. MacNeal

  (1)  N/A  120,769   241,538   483,075        
  (2)  2/28/2017     2,038   8,153   22,421      375,000  

Mr. Chiappone

  (1)  N/A  91,746   183,493   366,985        
  (2)  2/28/2017     1,448   5,790   15,923      270,400  

Mr. Cookson

  (1)  N/A  92,154   184,308   368,615        
  (2)  2/28/2017     1,470   5,879   16,167      266,300  

Mr. Hershey

  (1)  N/A  125,460   250,920   501,840        
   (2)  2/28/2017              5,504   11,007   24,766               506,300  
       

Estimated Future

Payouts Under

Non-Equity Incentive Plan

Awards

  

Estimated Future

Payouts Under

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards

  

All Other

Stock

Awards:

Number
of

Shares of

Stock or

Units

(#)

  

All Other

Option

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Under-

Lying
Options

(#)

  

Exercise
or Base
Price

of Option

Awards

($/Sh)

  

Grant Date

Fair Value

of Stock

and Option

Awards

($)

 
Name    Grant Date 

Threshold

($)

  

Target

($)

  

Maximum

($)

  

Threshold

(#)

  

Target

(#)

  

Maximum

(#)

 

Victor D. Grizzle

  (1 )  N/A  400,000   800,000   1,600,000                             
  (2 )  2/25/2020     17,521   35,042   94,613      3,539,454  

Brian L. MacNeal

  (1 )  N/A  133,875   267,750   535,500        
  (2 )  2/25/2020     2,536   5,072   13,694      512,304  

Charles M. Chiappone

  (1 )  N/A  132,300   264,600   529,200        
  (2 )  2/25/2020     2,715   5,430   14,661      548,463  

Mark A. Hershey

  (1 )  N/A  130,785   261,570   523,140        
  (2 )  2/25/2020     2,890   5,780   15,606      583,815  

Ellen R. Romano

  (1 )  N/A  90,318   180,637   361,273        
   (2 )  2/25/2020              1,556   3,111   8,400               314,226  
(1)

The amounts shown represent the 20172020 AIP threshold, target and maximum opportunity for each NEO. Actual payouts are included in theNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the SCT.

(2)

In 2017,2020, the Company’s LTILTIP program for NEOs included PSUs that have a three-year performance period based on Absolute TSR, and FCF;FCF, Mineral Fiber Volume; participants earn up to 275%270% of target for Messrs. Grizzle, MacNeal, Chiappone and Cookson and up to 225% of target for Mr. Hershey if the Company achieves the established performance goals. Any cash dividends declared on shares underlying PSUs will be accrued in anon-interest bearing account and paid when the restrictions on the underlying shares lapse.

 

LOGO

AWI 2018 Proxy Statement56          45AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCALYEAR-END

The table below shows the number of shares covered by exercisable and unexercisable stock options, and unvested RSUs and PSUs held by each NEO on December 31, 2017.2020. Market or payout values in the table below are based on the closing price of our shares of Common Stock on that date, $60.55.$74.39. Equity awards held by NEOs at the time of the 2016 separation of Armstrong Flooring Inc. were adjusted to reflect thesuch separation, consistent with equity awards held by other Company employees, and the table below includes outstanding adjusted awards as of December 31,2017.31, 2020.

 

     Option Awards  Stock Awards 
  

Grant

Date

  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
  

Option

Exercise

Price

($)

  

Option

Expiration

Date

  

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That
Have Not

Vested

(#)

  

Market Value

of Shares or

Units of Stock

That Have Not

Vested

($)

  

Equity Incentive

Plans Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares, Units

or Other Rights

That Have Not

Vested (#)

  

Equity Incentive

Plans Awards

Market or

Payout Value

of Unearned

Shares or

Other Rights

That Have Not

Vested ($)

 
Name  Exercisable  Unexercisable(1)       

Mr. Grizzle

  1/17/2011   19,158       32.03   01/17/21                 
  3/2/2011   31,200    31.15   03/02/21     
  2/28/2012   31,348    37.83   02/28/22     
  2/20/2013   25,689    45.32   02/20/23     
  2/25/2014   22,914    47.17   02/25/24     
  2/25/2015       5,983(1)   362,271   
  4/11/2016         31,445(3)   475,995 
  2/28/2017         12,500(4)   189,219 

Mr. MacNeal

  6/24/2014   3,740    49.96   06/24/24     
  2/24/2015       980(1)   59,339   
  4/11/2016         6,738(3)   102,000 
  2/28/2017         2,038(4)   30,854 

Mr. Chiappone

  2/28/2012   2,307    37.83   02/28/22     
  2/20/2013   3,781    45.32   02/20/23     
  2/25/2014   5,904    47.17   02/25/24     
  2/25/2015       1,519(1)   91,975   
  4/11/2016         4,785(3)   72,433 
  2/28/2017         1,448(4)   21,912 

Mr. Cookson

  2/28/2012   12,412    37.83   02/28/22     
  2/20/2013   7,218    45.32   02/20/23     
  2/25/2014   7,706    47.17   02/25/24     
  2/25/2015       1,798(1)   108,869   
  4/11/2016         4,859(3)   73,549 
  2/28/2017         1,470(4)   22,248 

Mr. Hershey

  7/1/2011   15,454    35.29   07/01/21     
  2/28/2012   20,319    37.83   02/28/22     
  2/20/2013   17,539    45.32   02/20/23     
  2/25/2014   16,184    47.17   02/25/24     
  2/25/2015       4,145(1)   250,980   
  4/11/2016       13,537(2)   819,665   
  4/11/2016         6,065(3)   183,618 
   2/28/2017                           5,504(4)   166,618 
     Option Awards  Stock Awards 
  

Grant

Date

  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
  

Option

Exercise

Price

($)

  

Option

Expiration

Date

  

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock That

Have Not

Vested

(#)

  

Market
Value

of Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have Not

Vested

($)

  

Equity Incentive

Plans Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares, Units

or Other Rights

That Have Not

Vested (#)

  

Equity Incentive

Plans Awards

Market or

Payout Value

of Unearned

Shares or

Other Rights

That Have Not

Vested ($)

 
Name Exercisable  Unexercisable 

Victor D. Grizzle

  2/28/2012   31,348       37.83   02/28/22                 
  2/20/2013   25,689    45.32   02/20/23     
  2/25/2014   22,914    47.17   02/25/24     
  2/27/2018         52,454(1)   3,902,053 
  2/26/2019         44,403(2)   3,303,139 
  2/25/2020         35,042(3)   2,606,774 

Brian L. MacNeal

  6/24/2014   3,740    49.96   06/24/24     
  2/27/2018         7,664(1)   570,125 
  2/26/2019         6,863(2)   510,539 
  2/25/2020         5,072(3)   377,306 

Charles M. Chiappone

  2/27/2018         6,276(1)   466,872 
  2/26/2019         6,217(2)   462,483 
  2/25/2020         5,430(3)   403,938 

Mark A. Hershey

  2/27/2018         8,567(1)   637,299 
  2/26/2019         7,051(2)   524,524 
  2/25/2020         5,780(3)   429,974 

Ellen R. Romano

  2/27/2018         5,290(1)   393,523 
  2/26/2019         4,312(2)   320,770 
   2/25/2020                           3,111(3)   231,427 
 (1)Grant will vest in three equal installments one, two and three years from the date of grant.

(2)Grant will vest in three equal installments two, three and four years from the date of grant.

(3)The number of shares of Common Stock represents the amount that vests if threshold is achieved for the 20162018 PSU grant (based on Absolute TSR and FCF goals). The awards would vestvested on December 31, 2018.2020. Earned and vested Performance Units as determined by the Management Development & Compensation Committee shall be payable on or before May 31, 2021. Participants can earn up to 275% of target for Messrs. Grizzle, MacNeal Chiappone and CooksonChiappone and 225% of target for Mr. Hershey.Hershey and Ms. Romano.

 

 

 (4)(2)

The number of shares of Common Stock represents the amount that vests if threshold is achieved for the 20172019 PSU grant (based on Absolute TSR and FCF goals). The awards would vest on December 31, 2019.2021. Participants can earn up to 275% of target for Messrs. Grizzle, MacNeal Chiappone and CooksonChiappone and 225% of target for Mr. Hershey and Ms. Romano.

 

 

(3)

The number of shares of Common Stock represents the amount that vests if threshold is achieved for the 2020 PSU grant (based on Absolute TSR, FCF and Mineral Fiber Volume goals). The awards would vest on December 31, 2022. Participants can earn up to 270% of target.

46AWI 2021 Proxy Statement          AWI 2018 Proxy Statement57


OPTION EXERCISED AND STOCK VESTED

The following table shows the exercise of stock options by each NEO during 2017,2020, as well as stock awards held by each NEO that became free of restrictions during 2017.2020.

 

   Option Awards   Restricted Stock
Awards
 
Name  

Number

of Shares

Acquired

on Exercise

(#)

   

Value

Realized

on Exercise

($)

   

Number
of Shares

Acquired

on Vesting

(#)

   

Value

Realized

on Vesting

($)(1)

 

Mr. Grizzle

   —      —      9,511    387,392 

Mr. MacNeal

   —      —      1,551    63,169 

Mr. Chiappone

   —      —      2429    98,950 

Mr. Cookson

   —      —      2,983    121,636 

Mr. Hershey

   —      —      6,638    270,424 
   Option Awards   Restricted Stock
Awards
 
Name  

Number

of Shares

Acquired

on Exercise

(#)

   

Value

Realized

on Exercise

($)

   

Number
of Shares

Acquired

on Vesting

(#)

   

Value

Realized

on Vesting

($)(1)

 

Victor D. Grizzle

   50,358    2,339,618    131,500    9,642,895 

Brian L. MacNeal

   —      —      21,443    1,572,415 

Charles M. Chiappone

   11,992    680,329    15,227    1,116,596 

Mark A. Hershey

   33,723    1,139,586    25,317    1,905,958 

Ellen R. Romano

   —      —      15,528    1,171,493 

 

(1)

Represents the number of RSUs/ PSUs that vested in 2017.2020. The value realized upon vesting is computed by multiplying the number of units by the value of the underlying shares on the vesting date.

The performance period for PSUs granted in 2018 ended on December 31, 2020. The final payout determination was made in April 2021 by the Compensation Committee after a review of the Company’s performance and certification of achievement of the performance goals. The final 2018 PSU shares paid out and the value realized in April 2021 are set forth below.

Name  

2018 PSU

Absolute TSR

Shares Granted

(#)

   

2018 PSU

Absolute TSR

Payout Factor

  

2018 PSU

Absolute TSR

Final Payout

(#)

   

PSU Absolute

TSR Value on

Vesting(a)

($)

 

Victor D. Grizzle

   39,341    139  54,684    5,063,738 

Brian L. MacNeal

   5,748    139  7,990    739,874 

Charles M. Chiappone

   4,707    139  6,543    605,882 

Mark A. Hershey

   2,142    139  2,978    275,763 

Ellen R. Romano

   1,323    139  1,839    170,291 
Name  

2018 PSU FCF

Shares Granted

(#)

   

2018 PSU FCF

Payout Factor

  

2018 PSU FCF

Final Payout

(#)

   

PSU FCF Value on
Vesting(a)

($)

 

Victor D. Grizzle

   13,113    95  12,458    1,153,611 

Brian L. MacNeal

   1,916    95  1,821    168,625 

Charles M. Chiappone

   1,569    95  1,491    138,067 

Mark A. Hershey

   6,425    97  6,233    577,176 

Ellen R. Romano

   3,967    97  3,848    356,325 

(a)

Value at $92.60, the closing price of our shares of Common Stock on April 5, 2021, the date of Compensation Committee final payout determination.

 

AWI 2018 Proxy Statement58          47AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


PENSION BENEFITS

The table below shows the present value of accumulated benefits payable to each of the NEOs, including the number of years of service credited to each such NEO, under the RIP and the RBEP as of December 31, 2017.2020. The amounts were determined using the same interest rate and mortality rate assumptions used in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020. Information regarding the RIP and RBEP can be found in Note 1618 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020.

 

Name  Plan Name  

Number of Years
Credited Service

(#)

   

Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit

($)

   

Payments During
Last Fiscal Year

($)

 

Mr. Grizzle

  Not eligible      

Mr. MacNeal

  Not eligible      

Mr. Chiappone

  Not eligible      
  Retirement Income Plan for Employees of Armstrong World Industries, Inc.   38.5    2,176,702    0 

Mr. Cookson

        
  Retirement Benefit Equity Plan of Armstrong World Industries, Inc.   38.5    1,662,945    0 

Mr. Hershey

  Not eligible               
Name  Plan Name  

Number of Years
Credited Service

(#)

   

Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit

($)

   

Payments During
Last Fiscal Year

($)

 

Victor D. Grizzle

  Not eligible  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Brian L. MacNeal

  Not eligible  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Charles M. Chiappone

  Not eligible  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Mark A. Hershey

  Not eligible  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  Retirement Income Plan for Employees of Armstrong World Industries, Inc.   37.5    2,131,538    0 

Ellen R. Romano

  

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  Retirement Benefit Equity Plan of Armstrong World Industries, Inc.   37.5    1,969,764    0 

 

The RBEP was established to pay any benefit which cannot be paid under the RIP due to Internal Revenue Code compensation or benefits limitations. All pension benefits are paid by the Company. The pension plans were closed to new salaried participants effective January 1, 2005.2005 and pension benefits were frozen for all salaried employees on December 31, 2017. Benefits payable under the RIP and RBEP are based on a formula that yields an annual amount payable over the participant’s lifetime beginning at the age where the participant qualifies for an unreduced life annuity benefit.

In addition, Mr. Cookson may qualifyMs. Romano qualified for an additional annuity payment under the ESOP Pension Account (the “EPA”) to the extent such benefit can be paid under the qualified pension plan. The EPA was established in 2000 to restore a portion of the value lost by a broad group of employees who had purchased shares of Company stock and received Company contributions of additional shares which were intended to help fund the cost of their retiree health care coverage. The starting EPA balance was determined by multiplying the number of ESOP shares held by the participant by $47.75 which was the guaranteed value of the original ESOP convertible preferred shares. The EPA is credited

with interest annually using theNovember 30-year Treasury bond rate. Interest is credited up to the date the participant commences regular pension benefits under the RIP.

Participants in the RIP may retire as early as age 55 provided the participant is vested under the plan. Participants become vested after completing five years of continuous employment having worked at least 1,000 hours in each year. Normal retirement date is the first of the month nearest the participant’s 65th birthday. Except as noted below, there is a reduction for early retirement for salaried participants who retire between the ages of 55 and 65. An employee who retires from active employment can receive an unreduced pension benefit commencing on the date of retirement if the employee’s age (minimum age 55) and Total Servicetotal service totals 90 points (the “Rule of 90”). The unreduced Rule of 90 benefit is limited to the employee’s pension amount accrued to February 28, 2006. Employees receive credit for post-March 1, 2006 age and service for Rule of 90 eligibility.

The normal form of benefit payment is a monthly annuity. Except for payments having a lump sum present value of $100,000 or less under the qualified plan, no involuntary lump sum payments

AWI 2021 Proxy Statement    59


PENSION BENEFITS (CONTINUED)

are permitted. Various forms of annuity payments (including life, joint and survivor, period certain and level income options) are available under the pension plans. The annuity payments for these options are determined by actuarially adjusting the life annuity pension amount for the selected form of

48    AWI 2018 Proxy Statement


PENSION BENEFITS(CONTINUED)

payment. The formula for the regular life annuity pension benefit for salaried employees under the RIP is based on the following factors:

 

the participant’s Average Final Compensation (the “AFC”) which is the average of the three highest years of eligible compensation (base salary plus annual incentive) during the last ten years of employment;

 

the participant’s number of years of Total Service (credited years of employment with the Company) used to calculate the pension amount; and

 

the participant’s Adjusted Covered Compensation (the “ACC”), which is a percentage of the average Social Security tax base for the35-year period ending with the year the participant will qualify for an unreduced Social Security pension benefit.

The unreduced annual life annuity pension is the sum of the following four calculations, each of which may not be less than zero:

 

1.

AFC x 0.009 x Total Service to a maximum of 35 years; plus

 

2.

(AFC – ACC) x 0.005 x Total Service to 35 years; plus

 

3.

(AFC – 2 x ACC) x 0.0015 x Total Service to 35 years; plus

 

4.

AFC x 0.012 x Total Service over 35 years.

To the extent the participant is eligible for an EPA pension benefit that can be paid from the RIP, all of

the allowable portion of the calculated EPA annuity will be added to the regular pension amount. EPA annuity amounts that cannot be paid from the qualified plan are forfeited.

Special provisions apply if the qualified pension plan is terminated within five years following an Extraordinary Event, as this term is defined in the RIP. Upon the occurrence of such an event, plan liabilities would first be satisfied, and then remaining plan assets would be applied to increase retirement income to employees. The amount of the increase is based on the assumption that the employee would have continued employment with Armstrong until retirement. The NEOs who are eligible for RIP pension benefitsMs. Romano would be entitled to this benefit under these circumstances.

The assumptions used to calculate the actuarial present values shown in the table above are as follows:

 

Discount rated used to value benefit obligations equals 3.6%2.33%;

 

RP 2014PRI2012 Projected from 20062012 with MP2017;

MP2020;

 

EPA interest rate of 2.86%2.28%;

 

1994 GAR(RR2001-62) Mortality Table for EPA annuity conversion; and

 

Retirement at age 65 or Rule of 90 eligibility, as specified.

 

 

AWI 2018 Proxy Statement60          49AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

The table below shows the executive contributions, earnings and account balances for each NEO who participates in the NQDCP.

 

Name  

Executive

Contributions

in 2017

($)(1)

   

Registrant

Contributions

in 2017

($)(2)

   

Aggregate

Earnings in

2017

($)

   

Aggregate

Withdrawals/

Distributions

($)

   

Aggregate

Balance at

12/31/17

($)

 

Mr. Grizzle

   99,894    74,921    61,881    —      509,128 

Mr. MacNeal

   33,277    24,958    17,398    —      122,026 

Mr. Chiappone

   6,829    5,122    6,508    —      48,549 

Mr. Cookson

   Not Eligible         

Mr. Hershey

   39,798    29,849    60,644    —      455,483 
Name  

Executive

Contributions

in 2020

($)(1)

   

Registrant

Contributions

in 2020

($)(2)

   

Aggregate

Earnings in

2020

($)

   

Aggregate

Withdrawals/

Distributions

($)

   

Aggregate

Balance at

12/31/2020

($)

 

Victor D. Grizzle

   115,117    86,338    173,882    —      1,320,196 

Brian L. MacNeal

   10,162    7,621    74,917    —      376,376 

Charles M. Chiappone

   5,214    4,693    13,576    —      91,404 

Mark A. Hershey

   38,327    28,745    106,828    —      833,067 

Ellen R. Romano

   22,752    17,064    19,731    —      135,372 

 

(1)

The amount in this column is also reported as either Salary orNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation in the SCT.

(2)

The amount in this column is also reported in the All Other Compensation column of the SCT.

(3)

The table below reflects amounts reported in the aggregate balance at last fiscal year end that were previously reported as compensation to the NEO in the SCT for previous years.

 

Name  

Amount

Previously

Reported

($)

 

Mr.Victor D. Grizzle

   254,818765,666 

Mr.Brian L. MacNeal

   32,036207,781 

Mr.Charles M. Chiappone

23,812

Mark A. Hershey

   239,736432,969

Ellen R. Romano

67,742 

 

Our defined benefit pension plans were closed to newAll salaried participants effective January 1, 2005 and to existing salaried participants who did not meetemployees, including the age and service requirements as of March 1, 2006. Since Messrs. Grizzle, MacNeal, Chiappone and Hershey do not participate in the Company’s pension plan, theyNEOs, are eligible to participate in a 401(k) savings plan with an enhanced Company match.plan. We match 100% on the first 4% of employee contributions and 50% on the next 4% of employee contributions in the enhanced plan.contributions.

The NQDCP was established to provide benefits similar to the 401(k) plan as it applies to eligible employees whose eligible earnings (base salary plus annual incentive) exceed 12.5 times the Internal Revenue Code 402(g) elective deferral limit in effect for the plan year. A participant may elect to defer up to 25% of eligible base salary earnings and up to 25% of eligible annual incentive earnings. The Company matching contribution will be the same as that provided under the 401(k) savings plan with the enhanced Company match. Participants may transfer account balances between any of the applicable plans’ available investment options.

Under the NQDCP, participants become 100% vested in the Company match account after completing three years of continuous employment having worked at least 1,000 hours in each year.

Under the NQDCP, except in the case of an unforeseeable emergency or having reached age 70, noin-service distributions are permitted. Participants can elect to receive plan benefits as a single lump sum or in 120 monthly installments commencing after the date of the participant’s termination of employment. All elections must comply with the Internal Revenue Code requirements. If the total account value is less than $10,000, the entire account balance will be paid as a single sum at the time of termination. In the event of a participant’s death, any remaining payments shall be paid to the participant’s designated beneficiary or estate.

Under the NQDCP, the Company reserves the right to cause the participant to forfeit or require repayment of the Company match benefits where the participant is discharged for willful, deliberate or gross misconduct or where the participant has engaged in conduct that is injurious to the Company.Company

 

 

50AWI 2021 Proxy Statement          AWI 2018 Proxy Statement61


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

The tables below summarize the estimated value of the potential payments and benefits under the Company’s plans and arrangements to which each NEO would be entitled upon termination of employment under the circumstances indicated. Except for the continuation of health and welfare benefits and outplacement support, amounts would be paid as a lump sum at termination. The amounts shown assume that such termination was effective December 31, 2017.2020.

The “Change in Control” column assumes that there is no limitation on payments under the “best net” provision in each CIC agreement relating to tax under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code. Amounts in the “Change in Control” column are “double trigger” payments and are therefore applicable only in the event both a change in control (“CIC”) event and either an involuntary (without cause) termination or a termination for Good Reason under the CIC agreement occur. The PSUs are valued at target.target for purposes of the tables below.

Victor D. Grizzle

 

 

  Reason for Termination 
Program Element  Resignation  

Involuntary

for Cause

  

Involuntary

without

Cause

   

Termination

for Good

Reason

   

Change in

Control

 

Cash Severance

  —    —    $3,240,000   $3,240,000   $4,050,000 

Health & Welfare Benefit Continuation

  —    —     —      —      37,462 

Outplacement Support

  —    —     30,000    30,000    30,000 

Pro-rated Bonus

  —    —     810,000    810,000    810,000 

Accelerated Long-Term Incentives

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Performance Shares

  —    —     —      —      9,811,967 
  

 

 

Total

  —    —    $4,080,000   $4,080,000   $14,739,429 

Brian L. MacNeal

 

 

  Reason for Termination 
Program Element  Resignation  

Involuntary

for Cause

  

Involuntary

without

Cause

   

Termination

for Good

Reason

   

Change in

Control

 

Cash Severance

  —    —    $1,042,895   $1,042,895   $1,390,526 

Health & Welfare Benefit Continuation

  —    —     —      —      57,010 

Outplacement Support

  —    —     30,000    30,000    30,000 

Pro-rated Bonus

  —    —     260,724    260,724    260,724 

Accelerated Long-Term Incentives

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Performance Shares

  —    —     —      —      1,457,970 
  

 

 

Total

  —    —    $1,333,619   $1,333,619   $3,196,230 

 

Mr. Grizzle                    
   Reason for Termination 
Program Element  Resignation   

Involuntary

for Cause

   Involuntary
without
Cause
   Termination
for Good
Reason
   Change in
Control
 

Cash Severance

   —      —     $2,900,000   $2,900,000   $3,625,000 

Health & Welfare Benefit Continuation

   —      —      —      —      93,383 

Outplacement Support

   —      —      30,000    30,000    30,000 

Pro-rated Bonus

   —      —      725,000    725,000    725,000 

Accelerated Long-Term Incentives

          

Performance Shares

   —      —      —      —      10,643,418 

Restricted Stock

   —      —      —      —      362,271 

Stock Options

   —      —      —      —      —   
  

 

 

 

Total

   —      —     $3,655,000   $3,655,000   $15,479,072 
62    AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


 

Mr. MacNeal                    
   Reason for Termination 
Program Element  Resignation   

Involuntary

for Cause

   Involuntary
without
Cause
   Termination
for Good
Reason
   Change in
Control
 

Cash Severance

   —      —     $988,200   $988,200   $1,317,600 

Health & Welfare Benefit Continuation

   —      —      —      —      74,903 

Outplacement Support

   —      —      30,000    30,000    30,000 

Pro-rated Bonus

   —      —      247,050    247,050    247,050 

Accelerated Long-Term Incentives

          

Performance Shares

   —      —      —      —      2,125,668 

Restricted Stock

   —      —      —      —      59,339 

Stock Options

   —      —      —      —      —   
  

 

 

 

Total

   —      —     $1,265,250   $1,265,250   $3,854,560 

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL (CONTINUED)

Charles M. Chiappone

 

 

  Reason for Termination 
Program Element  Resignation  

Involuntary

for Cause

  

Involuntary

without

Cause

   

Termination

for Good

Reason

   

Change in

Control

 

Cash Severance

  —    —    $1,030,628   $1,030,628   $1,374,171 

Health & Welfare Benefit Continuation

  —    —     —      —      64,062 

Outplacement Support

  —    —     30,000    30,000    30,000 

Pro-rated Bonus

  —    —     257,657    257,657    257,657 

Accelerated Long-Term Incentives

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Performance Shares

  —    —     —      —      1,333,292 
  

 

 

Total

  —      $1,318,286   $1,318,286   $3,059,182 

Mark A. Hershey

 

 

  Reason for Termination 
Program Element  Resignation  

Involuntary

for Cause

  

Involuntary

without

Cause

   

Termination

for Good

Reason

   

Change in

Control

 

Cash Severance

  —    —    $1,023,788   $1,023,788   $1,365,051 

Health & Welfare Benefit Continuation

  —    —     —      —      55,239 

Outplacement Support

  —    —     30,000    30,000    30,000 

Pro-rated Bonus

  —    —     255,947    255,947    255,947 

Accelerated Long-Term Incentives

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Performance Shares

  —    —     —      —      2,046,618 
  

 

 

Total

  —      $1,309,736   $1,309,736   $3,752,855 

Ellen R. Romano

 

 

  Reason for Termination 
Program Element  Resignation  

Involuntary

for Cause

  

Involuntary

without

Cause

   

Termination

for Good

Reason

   

Change in

Control

 

Cash Severance

  —    —    $747,176   $747,176   $996,235 

Health & Welfare Benefit Continuation

  —    —     —      —      28,693 

Outplacement Support

  —    —     30,000    30,000    30,000 

Pro-rated Bonus

  —    —     176,751    176,751    176,751 

Accelerated Long-Term Incentives

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Performance Shares

  —    —     —      —      945,720 
  

 

 

Total

  —    —    $953,927   $953,927   $2,177,399 

 

 

 AWI 20182021 Proxy Statement          5163


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL(CONTINUED)

Mr. Chiappone                    
   Reason for Termination 
Program Element  Resignation   

Involuntary

for Cause

   Involuntary
without
Cause
   Termination
for Good
Reason
   Change in
Control
 

Cash Severance

   —      —     $834,705   $834,705   $1,112,940 

Health & Welfare Benefit Continuation

   —      —      —      —      79,167 

Outplacement Support

   —      —      30,000    30,000    30,000 

Pro-rated Bonus

   —      —      185,490    185,490    185,490 

Accelerated Long-Term Incentives

          

Performance Shares

   —      —      —      —      1,509,512 

Restricted Stock

   —      —      —      —      91,975 

Stock Options

   —      —      —      —      —   
  

 

 

 

Total

   —      —     $1,050,195   $1,050,195   $3,009,084 

Mr. Cookson                    
   Reason for Termination 
Program Element  Resignation   

Involuntary

for Cause

   

Involuntary

without

Cause

   

Termination

for Good

Reason

   

Change in

Control

 

Cash Severance

   —      —     $835,470   $835,470   $1,113,960 

Health & Welfare Benefit Continuation

   —      —      —      —      70,832 

Outplacement Support

   —      —      30,000    30,000    30,000 

Pro-rated Bonus

   —      —      185,660    185,660    185,660 

Accelerated Long-Term Incentives

          

Performance Shares

   —      —      —      —      1,532,763 

Restricted Stock

   —      —      —      —      108,869 

Stock Options

   —      —      —      —      —   
  

 

 

 

Total

   —      —     $1,051,130   $1,051,130   $3,042,084 

Mr. Hershey                    
   Reason for Termination 
Program Element  Resignation   

Involuntary

for Cause

   Involuntary
without
Cause
   Termination
for Good
Reason
   Change in
Control
 

Cash Severance

   —      —     $972,000   $972,000   $1,296,000 

Health & Welfare Benefit Continuation

   —      —      —      —      71,152 

Outplacement Support

   —      —      30,000    30,000    30,000 

Pro-rated Bonus

   —      —      243,000    243,000    243,000 

Accelerated Long-Term Incentives

          

Performance Shares

   —      —      —      —      1,400,945 

Restricted Stock

   —      —      —      —      1,070,645 

Stock Options

   —      —      —      —      —   
  

 

 

 

Total

   —      —     $1,245,000   $1,245,000   $4,111,742 

52    AWI 2018 Proxy Statement


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL(CONTINUED)

 

Resignation or Involuntary Termination for Cause

No incremental benefits are provided to any of the NEOs in the event of a voluntary resignation or an involuntary termination for Cause. Cause is defined as (i) the willful and continued failure by the executive to substantially perform the executive’s duties after a written demand for substantial performance is delivered to the executive by the Board, or (ii) the willful engaging by the executive in conduct which is demonstrably and materially injurious to the Company, or (iii) the executive’s conviction of any felony.

Involuntary Termination without Cause in the absence of CIC

In the event of a qualifying involuntary termination, all salaried employees are eligible for continuation of health care and life insurance benefits at active employee premium contributions for a period of six months unless the employee is eligible for and elects retiree health care coverage. In addition, senior executives, including the NEOs, are eligible for twelve months of executive outplacement support provided by an outside service provider.

Pursuant to the individual separationseverance agreements, and upon the execution of a release of claims, Messrs. Grizzle, MacNeal, Chiappone, Cookson and Hershey and Ms. Romano are entitled to severance upon a termination by the Company without cause or Good Reason (as defined below) in an amount equal to one andone-half times (two times for Mr. Grizzle) their then current annual base salary plus target annual incentive under the Company’s AIP program, payable in a lump sum, and apro-rated annual incentive bonus based on actual performance for the year of termination, payable at the time that bonuses are paid to employees of the Company.Company

For purposes of the separationseverance agreements, Good Reason is generally defined to mean: (i) a material diminution in authority, duties, or responsibilities or the assignment of duties or responsibilities that are materially inconsistent with those currently in effect; (ii) a 10% reduction of base salary, except foracross-the-board salary reductions similarly affecting all senior executive officers of the Company; (iii) the relocation of principal place of

employment to a location more than 50 miles from his or her current principal place of employment; (iv) a material breach by the Company of its obligations under the severance agreement; or (v) failure of the Company to obtain assumption and agreement by a successor of the Company to be bound by the severance agreement.

Information in the tables above assumes that any termination was effective December 31, 20172020 and is based on the program parameters in effect as of December 31, 20172020 as outlined above.

Qualifying Involuntary Termination Following a Change in Control

Under each executive’s separationseverance agreement, the executive is entitled to receive severance payments upon involuntary termination without cause or termination for Good Reason within two years following a CIC, or within six months preceding a CIC if the termination is in connection with a potential CIC. Termination for Good Reason is defined in each executive’s individual CIC agreement and includes any one of the following events following a CIC:

 

(i)

the assignment to the executive of any duties inconsistent with the executive’s status as an executive officer of the Company or a substantial adverse alteration in the nature or status of the executive’s responsibilities, including diminution as a result of the Company no longer being a publicly traded corporation following the CIC;

 

(ii)

a reduction by the Company in the executive’s annual base salary;

 

(iii)

relocation of the executive’s principal place of employment to a location more than 50 miles from the principal place of employment immediately before the CIC;

 

(iv)

failure by the Company to pay to the executive any portion of the executive’s current compensation; or

 

(v)

failure by the Company to continue in effect any compensation or benefit plan in which the executive participates immediately prior to a CIC which is material to the executive’s total compensation unless an equitable arrangement has been made.

 

 

AWI 2018 Proxy Statement64          53AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL(CONTINUED)

 

CIC Arrangements – Key Terms

We will not provide taxgross-ups under Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code to any of our officers. Set forth below are certain key terms of the CIC agreements:

 

Term of Agreement

  Fixedone-year term that automatically renews for an additional year unless notice is given at least 90 days prior to the anniversary of intent not to renew; term automatically continues for two years if the CIC occurs during term

Severance Benefits

  2.5 times base salary plus target AIP for Mr. Grizzle, two times base salary plus target AIP for Messrs. MacNeal, Chiappone, Cookson and Hershey and Ms. Romano

Pro rata AIP

  Prorated target AIP bonus for year of termination

Accelerated Equity Vesting

  Double-trigger accelerated vesting (requires a CIC and qualifying termination of employment) for stock options, RSUs, PSUs and other equity grants to vest if assumed by the acquirer; the Compensation Committee may cash out equity grants if not assumed by the acquirer.

280G Taxation

  Any amounts paid under the CIC Agreement will be reduced to the maximum amount that can be paid without being excess parachute payments under Internal Revenue Code Section 280G and that are subject to the excise tax imposed under Internal Revenue Code Section 4999, but only if theafter-tax benefit of the reduced amount is higher than theafter-tax benefit of the unreduced amount

 

“Change in Control” (CIC) generally means the occurrence of one of the following events:

 

(I)

any person is or becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company (not including in the securities beneficially owned by such person any securities acquired directly from the Company or its affiliates) representing 35% or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities, excluding any person who becomes such a beneficial owner in connection with a transaction described in clause (i) of paragraph (III) below; or

 

(II)

the following individuals cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the number of directors then serving: individuals who, on the date hereof, constitute the Company’s board of directors and any new director (other than a director whose initial assumption of office is in connection with an actual or threatened election contest, including but not limited to a consent solicitation, relating to the election of directors of the Company) whose appointment or election by the Company’s board of directors or nomination for election by the Company’s shareholders was approved or recommended by a vote of at leasttwo-thirds (2/3) of the

 directors then still in office who either were directors on the date hereof or whose appointment, election or nomination for election was previously so approved or recommended; or;

 

(III)

there is consummated a merger or consolidation of the Company or any direct or indirect subsidiary of the Company with any other corporation, other than (i) a merger or consolidation immediately following which the individuals who comprise the Company’s board of directors immediately prior thereto constitute at least a majority of the board of directors of the Company, the entity surviving such merger or consolidation or, if the Company or the entity surviving such merger is then a subsidiary, the ultimate parent thereof, or (ii) a merger or consolidation effected to implement a recapitalization of the Company (or similar transaction) in which no Person is or becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company (not including in the securities beneficially owned by such person any securities acquired directly from the Company or its affiliates) representing 35% or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities; or

 

 

54AWI 2021 Proxy Statement          AWI 2018 Proxy Statement65


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL(CONTINUED)

 

(IV)

the shareholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company or there is consummated an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, other than a sale or disposition by the Company of all or

 substantially all of the Company’s assets immediately following which the individuals who comprise the board of directors of the Company immediately prior thereto constitute at least a majority of the board of directors of the entity to which such assets are sold or disposed or any parent thereof.
 

 

LOGO

AWI 2018 Proxy Statement66          55AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2017.2020.

 

(a) Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants, and rights
(b) Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants, and rights
(c) Number of securities
remaining available for
future Issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))

Equity compensation plans

approved by security holders

2,006,300(1)$34.23(2)2,745,715(3)

Equity compensation plans not

approved by security holders

—  Not Applicable—  
Totals2,006,300(1)$34.23(2)2,745,715(3)
  

 

  

(a) Number of securities to

be issued upon exercise

of outstanding options,

warrants, and rights

  

(b) Weighted-average

exercise price of

outstanding options,

warrants, and rights

  

(c) Number of securities

remaining available for

future Issuance under

equity compensation plans

(excluding securities

reflected in

column (a))

Equity compensation plans

approved by security holders

  654,497(1)  $42.41(2)  2,360,722(3)

Equity compensation plans not

approved by security holders

  94,230(4)  Not Applicable  513(5)
Totals  748,727  $42.41(2)  2,361,235
(1)

Includes RSUs, PSUs and stock options to purchase our shares of Common Stock granted under the Company’s 2016 LTIP and the 2008 and 2016 Directors Stock Unit Plan.Plans.

(2)

Represents the weighted-average exercise price of the outstanding stock options only; the outstanding RSUs and PSUs are not included in this calculation.

(3)

Reflects shares available pursuant to the issuance of stock options, RSUs, PSUs, or other stock-based awards under the 2016 LTIP and the 2008 and 2016 Director Plan.Stock Unit Plans. The aggregate number of shares of Common Stock reserved for the grant or settlement of awards under the 2016 LTIP (Share Limit) is 5,142,138, subject to adjustment as provided therein. With respect to awards granted on or after June 24, 2011, the number of shares of Common Stock reserved for award and issuance under this LTIP is reduced on aone-for-one basis for each Common Share subject to a Stock Option or Stock Appreciation Right and is reduced by a fixed ratio of 1.6 shares of Common Stock for each Common Share subject to a Restricted Stock Award or Stock Unit granted under the LTI.LTIP.

(4)

Includes RSAs of Common Stock granted under the Company’s 2020 Inducement Award Plan and as part of the Arktura Equity Interest Purchase Agreement entered into as of November 19, 2020.

(5)

Reflects shares available pursuant to the issuance of RSAs under the 2020 Inducement Award Plan. The 2020 Inducement Award Plan authorizes us to issue stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards and stock units to key employees and expires on December 14, 2030, after which time no further awards may be made. The 2020 Inducement Plan authorizes us to issue up to 19,000 shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2020, 513 shares were available for future grants under the 2020 Inducement Award Plan.

 

56AWI 2021 Proxy Statement          AWI 2018 Proxy Statement67


ADDITIONAL MEETING INFORMATION

 

Why did I receive aone-page notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?

This year we have again utilized the SEC rule allowing companies to furnish proxy materials to their shareholders over the Internet. We believe that this approach enables us to provide the materials to shareholders more quickly, while also reducing the impact of our annual meeting on the environment and the costs associated with printing and mailing.

How can I receive printed shareholder and proxy materials?

Please follow the instructions for “How to Access the Proxy Materials” on theone-page notice described above.

Who is soliciting my proxy?

The Board is soliciting your proxy in order to provide you with an opportunity to vote on all matters scheduled to come before the meeting, whether or not you attend the meeting in person.via the internet.

Who is entitled to vote?

Each holder of record of our shares of Common Stock, at the close of business on the record date, April 20, 201819, 2021 (“Record Date”), is entitled to one vote for each Common Share owned on each matter to be voted on. As of the Record Date, 51,950,67547,883,531 shares of Common Stock were issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

What must I do to attend the meeting via the Internet?

You may attend and participate in the Annual Meeting via the Internet atwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/awi2018awi2021 where you will be able to vote and submit questions during the meeting. Shareholders who use the control number that was furnished to them (either with the notice sent to them regarding the availability of these proxy materials or with their copy of these proxy materials) to log on to the meeting will be able to vote and submit questions during the meeting.

What mustWhy can’t I do to attend the meeting in person?

If you wishDue to attend the meeting in person, you must have been a shareholder on the Record Date and you must present an admission ticket and photo identification. To request an admission ticket and get directions, please email or write the Officecontinuing threat of the Corporate Secretary atAdmissionTicket@armstrongceilings.com or Attention: B. Tham, Armstrong World Industries, Inc., P. O. Box 3001, Lancaster, PA 17604-3001. We must receive your request at least ten business days priorcoronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic, we are sensitive to the meeting. If your shares of Common Stock are held directly in an account withpublic health and travel concerns our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company (“AST”), your name will appear inshareholders may have and the protocols that federal, state, and local governments have imposed. Hosting a virtual annual meeting provides easy access for our Record Date shareholder list. If your shares of Common Stock are inshareholders and facilitates participation since shareholders can participate from any location around the name of a broker, bank or other institution, you must provide evidence of your beneficial stock ownership on the Record Date.world.

How can I revoke my proxy?

Proxies are voted at the Annual Meeting. You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted, and your last vote is the vote that will be counted. If you are a shareholder of record on the Record Date and you returned a paper proxy card, you can write to the Corporate Secretary at our corporate offices, 2500 Columbia Avenue Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603, stating that you wish to revoke your proxy and that you need another proxy card. If you submitted your proxy by the Internet or by telephone, you can vote again over the Internet or by telephone. If you hold your shares of Common Stock through a broker, bank or other nominee, you can revoke your proxy by contacting the broker, bank or other nominee and following its procedure for revocation. If you are a shareholder of record on the Record Date and you attend meeting in person via the Annual Meeting,Internet, you must request a revocation of your submitted proxy and vote by ballot tomay revoke your proxy.proxy by voting electronically during the meeting. Your appearanceattendance via the Internet alone at the Annual Meeting will not of itself constitute a revocation of your proxy.

How many votes can be cast by all shareholders?

51,950,67547,883,531 votes, consisting of one vote for each outstanding Common Share outstanding on the Record Date.

AWI 2018 Proxy Statement    57


ADDITIONAL MEETING INFORMATION(CONTINUED)

What is the quorum requirement for the Annual Meeting?

A quorum of the holders of the outstanding shares of Common Stock must be present for the Annual Meeting to be held. A “quorum” is the presence at the Annual Meeting, in personvirtually or represented by proxy, of shareholders entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes which all shareholders are entitled to cast on a matter to be acted on at the

68    AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


ADDITIONAL MEETING INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker“non-votes” are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. A broker“non-vote” occurs when a broker does not vote on a particular proposal because the broker does not have discretionary voting power with respect to the proposal and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner.

What if a quorum is not present at the Annual Meeting?

If the Annual Meeting cannot be organized because a quorum is not present, the shareholders present at the Annual Meeting will have the power, except as otherwise provided by statute, to adjourn the Annual Meeting to such time and place as they may determine. Those shareholders who attend the second of such adjourned meetings, even if less than a quorum, shall nevertheless constitute a quorum for the purpose of electing directors.

What vote is required to elect directors at the Annual Meeting?

At the Annual Meeting, in connection with the election of directors, you will be entitled to cast one vote for each share held by you for each nominee. Votes may be cast “for” or “withheld” with respect to each nominee. Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting. A plurality means that the nominees with the largest number of votes cast “for” their election, up to the nine (9) directors to be chosen at the Annual Meeting, will be elected. Votes that are “withheld” will be excluded entirely from the vote and will have no effect, other than for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. However, the Board has adopted a Policy on Majority Voting, pursuant to which, in an uncontested election, any nominee for director who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election will within 10 business days following certification of the shareholder vote, tender his or her resignation to the Board. See “CORPORATE

GOVERNANCE Policy on Majority Voting in the Election of Directors.”

What vote is required to approve the other items at the Annual Meeting?

The ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 20182021 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes present and entitled to vote at the

meeting to be approved. The advisory approval of executive compensation requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes present and entitled to vote at the meeting to be approved. Any other matters that may be acted upon at the Annual Meeting will be determined by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our shares of Common Stock represented in person, via the Internet, or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter.

How are votes, abstentions and brokernon-votes counted?

Brokernon-votes will be included in determining whether a quorum is present but will have no effect on the outcome of the matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting, including in connection with the election of directors. Abstentions are not considered a vote cast under Pennsylvania law. Under our Bylaws, however, other than in connection with the election of directors, abstentions will have the effect of a negative vote with respect to matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting.

Who will count the votes and how much does it cost the Company?

We have engaged Broadridge Investor Communications Solutions, Inc. to tabulate the proxy votes and any votes cast in personat the meeting for a fee of approximately $25,000$50,000 plus reasonable expenses.

What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card or voting instructions?

It means that you have multiple accounts in which you own our shares of Common Stock. Please vote all proxy cards/voting instructions from the Company to ensure that all your shares of Common Stock are voted. However, you may want to contact your broker, bank or the Company’s transfer agent to consolidate as many accounts as possible under

58    AWI 2018 Proxy Statement


ADDITIONAL MEETING INFORMATION(CONTINUED)

a single name and address. Our transfer agent is AST. All communications concerning shares of Common Stock you hold in your name, including address changes, name changes, requests to transfer and similar issues, can be handled by contacting AST at American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, 6201 15th Avenue Brooklyn, NY 11219; or by email to info@amstock.com; or by phone(1-800-937-5449).

AWI 2021 Proxy Statement    69


ADDITIONAL MEETING INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

What should we do if multiple shareholders reside in our household, and we wish to change the copies of proxy materials that we receive?

Some banks, brokers, broker-dealers and other similar organizations acting as nominee record holders may be participating in the practice of “householding” proxy statements and annual reports. This means that, unless we have received contrary instructions from such bank, broker, broker-dealer or similar organization, only one copy of this proxy statement and the annual report may have been sent to multiple shareholders in your household. If you would prefer to receive separate copies of a proxy statement or annual report for other shareholders in your household, either now or in the future, please contact your bank, broker, broker-dealer or other similar organization serving as your nominee. Upon written or oral request to

the attention of Investor Relations, 2500 Columbia Avenue Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603, or via telephone to the Investor Relations department at717-396-6354, we will promptly provide separate copies of the annual report and/or this proxy

statement. Shareholders sharing an address who are receiving multiple copies of this proxy statement or annual report and who wish to receive a single copy of such materials in the future will need to contact their bank, broker, broker-dealer or other similar organization serving as their nominee to request that only a single copy of each document be mailed to all shareholders at the shared address in the future.

Who may solicit proxies on the Company’s behalf?

Our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies from our shareholders. These persons will not receive any additional compensation for these services. We will request that the Notice of Annual Meeting, this proxy statement, the proxy card, and related materials (if any), be forwarded to beneficial owners by banks, brokers and other persons for their reasonableout-of-pocket expenses in handling these materials. We will bear the costs of preparing, assembling and mailing the proxy materials and expect to reimburse such beneficial owners for all such solicitations.

 

 

OTHER BUSINESS

The Board knows of no matters other than the foregoing to come before the meeting. However, if any other matters properly come before the meeting, the persons named in the enclosed proxy will vote in their discretion with respect to such other matters.

 

AWI 2018 Proxy Statement    59


DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCEREPORTS

 

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and the regulations thereunder require certain of our officers, as well as our directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities (collectively, the “reporting persons”) to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and to furnish us with copies of these reports. Based solely on our review

of the copies of these reports within a prescribed period of time and written representations we received from the reporting persons, we believe that all filings required to be made by the reporting persons during or with respect to the period January 1, 20172020 through December 31, 20172020 were made on a timely basis.

 

 

70    AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


SUBMISSION OF SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

 

In order to submit shareholder proposals for the 20192022 annual meeting for inclusion in the Company’s 20192022 proxy statement pursuant to SEC Rule14a-8, materials must be received by the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s corporate offices in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, no later than December 31, 2018.January 7, 2022.

The proposals must comply with all of the requirements of SEC Rule14a-8. Proposals should be addressed to: Corporate Secretary, 2500 Columbia Avenue, Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603. As the rules of the SEC make clear, simply submitting a proposal does not guarantee its inclusion.

The Bylaws also establish an advance notice procedure with regard to director nominations and shareholder proposals that are not submitted for inclusion in the proxy statement, but that a shareholder instead wishes to present directly at an annual meeting. To be properly brought before the 20192022 annual meeting, a notice of the nomination or the matter the shareholder wishes to present at the meeting must be delivered to the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s corporate offices in

Lancaster (see above), not later than 90 days nor

earlier than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of this annual meeting. As a result, any notice given by or on behalf of a shareholder pursuant to these provisions of the Bylaws (and not pursuant to SEC Rule14a-8) must be received no earlier than February 24, 2022 and no later than April 13, 2019.March 26, 2022. All director nominations and shareholder proposals must comply with the requirements of our Bylaws, a copy of which may be obtained at no cost from the Corporate Secretary.

In either case, if the date of our 20192022 annual meeting is more than 30 calendar days before or after the first anniversary of this annual meeting, your proposal must be received by the Corporate Secretary by close of business on the fifteenth day following the day we publicly announce the date of the 20192022 annual meeting.

Any shareholder proposals not received by such applicable dates will be considered untimely and, if presented at the 20192022 annual meeting, the proxy holders will be able to exercise discretionary authority to vote on any such proposal to the extent authorized by SECExchange Act Rule 14a-4(c).

 

 

60    AWI 2018 Proxy Statement


ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM10-K

 

Our Annual Report to Shareholders, including financial statements, is being furnished simultaneously with this proxy statement to all shareholders of record as of the Record Date. A copy of our Annual Report and Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, including financial statements, but excluding the financial statement schedules and most exhibits, will be provided without charge to shareholders upon written request to: Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Investor Relations, P.O. Box 3001, Lancaster, PA 17604.

Our Annual Report is also available at www.proxyvote.com, or www.armstrongceilings.com – Investors – SEC Filings –10-K. The Form10-K will include a list of exhibits to the Form10-K. Copies of exhibits will be furnished to shareholders upon written request and upon our receipt of payment of reproduction and mailing expenses.

 

 

AWI 2021 Proxy Statement    71


INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

 

To the extent that this proxy statement has been or will be specifically incorporated by reference into any other filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, as amended, the sections of this proxy statement

entitled “Report of the Audit Committee” (to the extent permitted by the rules of the SEC) and “Compensation Committee Report” shall not be deemed to be so incorporated, unless specifically provided otherwise in such filing.

 

 

SHAREHOLDER LIST

A list of shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for examination by shareholders at the Annual Meeting.Meeting through the website portal for shareholders (see Additional Meeting Information section above).

 

AWI 2018 Proxy Statement72          61AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


ANNEX A to Armstrong World Industries, Inc. 20182021 Proxy Statement

To supplement its consolidated financial statements presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP), the Company provides additional measures of performance adjusted to exclude the impact of foreign exchange, restructuring charges and related costs, impairments, thenon-cash impact of the U.S. pension plan and certain other gains and losses. Adjusted figures are reported in comparable dollars using the budgeted exchange rate for 2018. The Company uses these adjusted performance measures in managing the business, including communications with its Board of Directors and employees, and believes that they provide users of this financial information with meaningful comparisons of operating performance between current results and results in prior periods. The Company believes that thesenon-GAAP financial measures are appropriate to enhance understanding of its past performance, as well as prospects for its future performance. A reconciliation of these adjustments to the most directly comparable GAAP measures is included in this release and on the Company’s website. Thesenon-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the most comparable GAAP measures.Non-GAAP financial measures utilized by the Company may not be comparable tonon-GAAP financial measures used by other companies. Dollars are in millions unless otherwise indicated.

 

   2017 

Adjusted EBITDA*

  $317 

Depreciation and Amortization

   (67

Operating Income, Adjusted

  $250 

U.S. Pension Credit

   (5

Net Proforma International Allocations, Other

   8 

Cost Reduction Initiatives

   7 

Net Environmental Recoveries

   (15

Operating Income, Reported

  $255 

Mineral Fiber

  
   2017 

Adjusted EBITDA*

  $287 

Depreciation and Amortization

   (58

Operating Income, Adjusted

  $229 

Cost Reduction Initiatives

   7 

Net Proforma International Allocations, Other

   5 

Net Environmental Recoveries

   (15

Operating Income, Reported

  $232 

Architectural Specialties

  
   2017 

Adjusted EBITDA

  $30 

Depreciation and Amortization

   (2

Operating Income, Reported

  $28 

Unallocated Corporate

  
   2017 

Adjusted EBITDA

  $—   

Depreciation and Amortization

   (6

Operating Income (Loss), Adjusted

  $(6

U.S. Pension Credit

   (5

Net Proforma International Allocations, Other

   3 

Operating Income (Loss), Reported

  $(5
   2020 

Adjusted EBITDA

  $330 

Depreciation and Amortization

   (84

Operating Income, Adjusted

  $246 

Charitable Contribution

  $(10

Net Environmental Recoveries (Expenses)

  $6 

Acquisition Related Expenses

   (3

U.S. Pension Expense

   (6

Gain on Sale of Idled China Plant Facility

   21 

Operating Income, Reported

  $255 

MINERAL FIBER

  
   2020 

Adjusted EBITDA

  $294 

Depreciation and Amortization

   (72

Operating Income, Adjusted

  $222 

Charitable Contribution

  $(10

Net Environmental Recoveries (Expenses)

   6 

Operating Income, Reported

  $219 

ARCHITECTURAL SPECIALTIES

  
   2020 

Adjusted EBITDA

  $36 

Depreciation and Amortization

   (11

Operating Income, Adjusted

  $25 

Acquisition Related Expenses

  $(3

Operating Income, Reported

  $22 

UNALLOCATED CORPORATE

  
   2020 

Adjusted EBITDA

  $—   

Depreciation and Amortization

  $(1

Operating Income, Adjusted

  $(1

U.S. Pension Expense

   (6

Gain on Sale of Idled China Plant Facility

  $21 

Operating Income (Loss), Reported

  $14 

 

*As a result of adopting a US GAAP accounting change for pension and post-retirement benefit plans that was effective January 1, 2018, $2 million of expenses that were recorded in 2017 EBITDA would have been excluded from EBITDA. Therefore, the company will report 2017 EBITDA as $319 million in future periods.

AWI 2021 Proxy Statement    73

A-1


CASH FLOW

    
   2017      
        Continuing Ops 

Net cash from operations

    $170 

Less: net cash (used for) investing

     (54

Add back (subtract): Acquisitions

     31 

Free Cash Flow

    $147 

CASH FLOW

  
   2020 

Net cash from operations

  $219 

Net cash (used for) investing activities

   (141

Add: Acquisition, net

   165 

Add: Litigation, net

   —   

Add/(Less): Environmental (Recoveries) Payment, net

   (12

Add/(Less): Payments for (Proceeds from) Sale of international, net

   (20

Add: Net Payments to WAVE for Portion of Proceeds from Sale of International Businesses

   13 

(Less): Proceeds from sale of Idled China Plant Facility

   (22

Add: Charitable Contribution

   10 

Adjusted Free Cash Flow

  $212 

74    AWI 2021 Proxy Statement


 

A-2

LOGO


LOGOLOGO

VOTE BY INTERNET Before The Meeting: www.proxyvote.com Use- www.proxyvote.comUse the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. up untilinformation. Vote by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date.ET on 06/23/2021. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your MARK A. HERSHEY records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. 2500 COLUMBIA AVENUE During The Meeting:Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/awi2018 LANCASTER, PA 17603AWI2021 You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up untilinstructions. Vote by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date.ET on 06/23/2021. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. MARK A. HERSHEY 2500 COLUMBIA AVENUE LANCASTER, PA 17603 TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: E47961-P09256 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. For Withhold For All All All Except To withhold authority to vote for any individual Allnominee(s), mark For All Except nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. the following: 1. Election of Directors ! ! ! Nominees: 01) Stan A. Askren 06) John J. Roberts 02) Victor D. Grizzle 07) Gregory P. Spivy 03) Tao Huang 08) Roy W. Templin 04) Larry S. McWilliams 09) Cherryl T. Thomas 05) James C. Melville The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposals: For Against Abstainfollowing: 1. Election of Directors Nominees 01) Stan A. Askren 02) Victor D. Grizzle 03) Tao Huang 04) Barbara L. Loughran 05) Larry S. McWilliams 06) James C. Melville 07) Wayne R. Shurts 08) Roy W. Templin 09) Cherryl T. Thomas The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3. 2. To ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018. ! ! !2021. 3. To approve, on an advisory basis, our executive compensation program. ! ! !Executive Compensation Program. NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. In their discretion, the proxy holders are authorized to vote on such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof. For Against Abstain Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. 0000490209_1 R1.0.0.177 Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date


LOGOLOGO

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Annual Report, and Notice &and Proxy Statement are available at www.proxyvote.com. E47962-P09256www.proxyvote.com ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. Annual Meeting of Shareholders July 12, 2018June 24, 2021 8:00 a.m.AM This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors The undersigned hereby appoints Victor D. Grizzle and James C. MelvilleLarry S. McWilliams as proxies, each with full power of substitution, to represent and vote as designated on the reverse side, all of the common shares of Common Stock of Armstrong World Industries, Inc. held of record by the undersigned on April 20, 2018,19, 2021, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on July 12, 2018June 24, 2021 at 8:00 a.m.,AM, or any adjournment or postponement thereof. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors’Directors' recommendations. Continued and to be signed on reverse side 0000490209_2 R1.0.0.177